Peer Review History: Effect of Loan Management Practices on Financial Performance of Umurenge Saving and Credit Cooperatives in Nyanza District

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Emmanuel Assifuah-Nunoo, Florida Atlantic University, United States of America.

(2) S. M. Akber, R. P. Shaha University, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daniel Ogidan, National Open University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(2) Ramesh Vankadoth, St Joseph Degree College (Autonomous) Osmania University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emmanuel Assifuah-Nunoo, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. M. Akber, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Validation of the Assam Rural Livelihood and Farming Scale (ARLFS) for the Socio-Economic Assessment of Khuti System Dwellers, Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Luis Lizardo Oscanoa Gamarra, Instituto De Innovacion Agraria, Peru.

(2) Geeta Singh, JNKVV Jabalpur MP, India.

(3) Kamakula N Murthy, Vignan’s Foundation for Science, Technology and Research (Deemed to be University), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Luis Lizardo Oscanoa Gamarra, Peru) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Geeta Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kamakula N Murthy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Yield, Quality and Economics of Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rahul Kumar Jaiswal, National Institute of Hydrology, India.

(2) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Nagarajan, Saveetha Univesrity, India.

(2) R. Ravikumar, PSG College of Arts & Science, India.

(3) Sunil Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Avtar Singh Bimbraw, Punjab Agricultural University, India.

(2) Dahmouni Said, Algeria.

(3) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Nagarajan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Ravikumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sunil Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Marketing Channels of Agroforestry Produce: A Case Study of the Central Narmada Valley Zone of Madhya Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Moses Katta, Consortium for Enhancing University Responsiveness to Agribusiness Development (CURAD), Uganda.

(2) Nandini Saha, Veer Kunwar Singh College of Agriculture, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arion Iulia Diana, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

(2) Nitu Kumari, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Moses Katta, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nandini Saha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Melted Electronic Waste Plastic as an Alternative to Cement in Pavement Block Manufacture: A Study of Mechanical Properties

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. José Alberto Duarte Moller, University of Sonora, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Hajir A Al-Hussainy, Kerbalaa University, Iraq.

(2) Lamyaa Ghanim Salim, Al Furat Al Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(3) Laxman Vishnu Jathar, Mumbai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K.Srinivas, JNA & FA University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hajir A Al-Hussainy, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lamyaa Ghanim Salim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Laxman Vishnu Jathar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluating the Impact of Cluster Frontline Demonstrations on Adoption of Improved Sesame Cultivation Practices in Banda, Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) ANJU KUMARI THAKUR, CAREER POINT UNIVERSITY HAMIRPUR, INDIA.

(2) Joni Kumar, C.C.R. (P.G.) College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (ANJU KUMARI THAKUR, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Joni Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Use of Yakult Probiotic Materials with Different Fermentation Durations in Bioflock Systems on Biological Performance of Vanname Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pınar Oguzhan Yildiz, Ataturk University, Fisheries.

Reviewers:

(1) Masoumeh Machanlou, Iran.

(2) Suneeti Satishchandra Gore, India.

(3) Sushil Bera , India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Masoumeh Machanlou, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Suneeti Satishchandra Gore, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sushil Bera , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Commodity Value Chains in Agroforestry: A Comprehensive Scientific Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

(2) Prof. Levent SON, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Adil Hakeem Khan, AEERO (Collaborated by GGSIPU), India.

(2) Bashiri Iddy Muzzo, Utah state University, USA.

(3) Shadrack Kinyua Inoti, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kritika, Patna University Patna, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adil Hakeem Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bashiri Iddy Muzzo, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shadrack Kinyua Inoti, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Fertilizer Subsidy Policy on Land Allocation for Rice Production in Western Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Abolfazl Azadi, AREEO, Ahvaz, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Fasakin Idowu James, Nigeria.

(2) Saikat Pande, Gujarat University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adesiyan Taiwo Fausiyat, Middle Tennesses State University, United States Of America.

(2) Mama Julius, Innovative Institute of Agriculture, Business and Capacity Building (IABC), Uganda.

(3) Osuji Uchenna Theresa, Federal College of Land Resource Technology (FECOLART), Nigeria.

(4) Seeone Sharma, Kurukshetra University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fasakin Idowu James, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saikat Pande, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Agrometeorological Indices in Summer Groundnut Cultivars in South Saurashtra Agro-Climatic Zone of Gujarat

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Lucas Theodori, Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST), Tanzania.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Monika Ray, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lucas Theodori, Tanzania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA