Peer Review History: Production Performance of Smallholder Upland and Swamp Rice Farmers by Gender in Ebonyi State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vasilii Erokhin, Harbin Engineering University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Khalid Mehmood, University of Sargodha, Pakistan.

(2) Johanna Suek, Nusa Cendana University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khalid Mehmood, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Johanna Suek, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Farmers’ Knowledge of Soil Testing: A Multi-Context Analysis Across Different Irrigation Systems

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Langa Tembo, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

(2) DR. FEROZE HASAN RAHMAN, ICAR – Agricutural Technology Application Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Kinjulck C Singh, JNKVV, India.

(2) Rukuosietuo Kuotsu, India.

(3) Erfan Mehregan, Sharif University of Technology, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deepjyoti Roy, Banaras Hindu University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kinjulck C Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rukuosietuo Kuotsu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Erfan Mehregan, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Split Potassium Fertilizer Application on Yield of Short-duration Transplanted Aman Rice Varieties

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Enver Kendal, Mardin Artuklu University, Kiziltepe, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ghulam Mujtaba, Pir Mehr Ali Shah, Arid Agriculture University, Pakistan.

(2) S. Manimaran, Annamalai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fasiulla, Manipal Institute Of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, India.

(2) Sayed Mohammad Reza Khoshroo, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ghulam Mujtaba, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Manimaran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Molecular Identification of Some Wood-decay Fungi of Some Softwood Timber by Using Internal Transcribed Spacer Primers in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  John Yahya I. Elshimali, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, California, USA.

(2) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Yogesh Sadashiv Patil, Shivaji University, India.

(2) Sanjay Kumar Bhariya, College of Agriculture, I.G.K.V., India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bandana Dhiman, Dr. YSP UHF Nauni, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yogesh Sadashiv Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanjay Kumar Bhariya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Between Trauma and Infection: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approach to Progressive Orbital Cellulitis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Erich Cosmi, University of Padua School of Medicine, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Deep Shikha Tripathi, Sheikh Ul Hind Maulana Mahmood Hasan Medical College, India.

(2) Gayatri Surendra Kaple, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

(3) Rashmi Rani Bharti, IGIMS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chandrakala.J, Rajiv Gandhi university of health and sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deep Shikha Tripathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gayatri Surendra Kaple, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rashmi Rani Bharti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Residue Retention on Methane Flux in a Maize-Chickpea Cropping System in Tropical Vertisols of Central India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Alok Gupta, India.

(2) Kouidri Mohammed Ali, Algeria.

(3) John Jeric A. Batanes, Philippines.

(4) Jinesh Shah, Atmiya University, India.

(5) Prosper Mensah, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Srikanta Kumar Mohapatra, Chitkara University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alok Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kouidri Mohammed Ali, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (John Jeric A. Batanes, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Jinesh Shah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Prosper Mensah, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impacts of Abiotic Stress on Flowering Response in Plants

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Michele Ribeiro Ramos, State University of Tocantins, Brazil.

(2) Mukesh Kumar, Govt.College Bahadurgarh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adeosun, Seun Adewale, Cocoa Research Institute of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(2) Brahmputra Meena, Dr RPCAU, India.

(3) Kabita Mondal, College of Agriculture, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

(4) Mirza Muhammad Ahad Baig, Pakistan.

(5) Nandini Saha, Veer Kunwar Singh College of Agriculture, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Michele Ribeiro Ramos, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mukesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Rural Collective Economy Policy in China: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Trends, Themes, and Operating Mechanisms Using R Studio

Editor(s):

(1) of.  Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Techno-logical University, Russia.

(2) Dr. Jichao Sun , China University of Geosciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Gopala Bhua, Sambalpur University, India.

(2) Imranullah Akhtar, Alfalah University, Afghanistan.

(3) B P Badal (Bharat Prasad Badal), Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashish Gosain, Jawaharlal Nehru University, India.

(2) Peripaul Oluchukwu Onuoha, University of Lagos, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gopala Bhua, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Imranullah Akhtar, Afghanistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (B P Badal, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | JOURNAL CHANGE TO AJARR from JSRR | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Grapevine Rootstocks on Fruit Characteristics and Must Composition of the Winegrape Cultivar Assyrtiko (Vitis vinifera L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Giovanni Guimaraes Landa, Brazil.

(2) Pushpa Kumari, Nalanda College of Horticulture, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Shilpa, India.

(2) Svjetlana Janković Šoja, University of Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Giovanni Guimaraes Landa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pushpa Kumari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Seasonal Incidence of Insect Pests on Cowpea and Efficacy of Biopesticides against Spotted Pod Borer (Maruca vitrata)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Ravi Kumar Rajak, Sardar Patel University, India.

(2) Salih Khalaf Atiyah, University of Tikrit, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ravi Kumar Rajak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Salih Khalaf Atiyah, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA