Peer Review History: Technology Adoption by Coffee Growers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Sangeeta Shree, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Kanika Issar, Dolphin PG Institute of Biomedical and Natural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abbas Hashem Mahlhal, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Mahesh Singh, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

(3) Veeren Dewoolkar, United States.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sangeeta Shree, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kanika Issar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Health-Related Quality of Life and Associated Factors among Renal Transplant Recipients in the Largest Kenyan Public Hospital

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. ZoranTodorovic, University of Belgrade, Serbia.

(2) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Xuzhou Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Sreeja PA, Dr.M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute, India.

(2) Vishnu R Yanamaladoddi, Creighton University, US.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deerush Kannan Sakthivel, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sreeja PA, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vishnu R Yanamaladoddi, US) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Smart Irrigation Systems Using the Internet of Things: Applications in Farming Systems

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Babasaheb Dnyandeo Patil, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), India.

(2) Azeem Ayaz, Shaheed Banzir Bhutto University SBA, Pakistan.

(3) Gayatri Bacchav, Vasantdada Patil Pratishthan’s College of Engineering and Visual Arts, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Babasaheb Dnyandeo Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Azeem Ayaz, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gayatri Bacchav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Efficacy of Chlorpyrifos 35% and Fipronil 3.5% EC against Thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood and Fruit Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) in Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Fatima Lizeth Gandarilla Pacheco, Universidad Autónoma De Nuevo León, México.

(2) Shahira H. EL-Moslamy, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute, Egypt.

(3) Prasanna Babu Racheeti, Shree Velagapudi Ramakrishna Memorial College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) De. Dwarka, JNKVV, College of Agriculture, India.

(2) Yunus Bayram, General Directorate of Food and Control, Türkiye.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fatima Lizeth Gandarilla Pacheco, México) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shahira H. EL-Moslamy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Prasanna Babu Racheeti, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Field Efficacy of Chlorpyrifos 35% + Fipronil 3.5% EC Against Shoot and Fruit Borer, Earias vitella (Fabricius) in Okra

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chung-Jen Chiang, China Medical University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Nishat Fatima, SR Institute of Management and Technology, India.

(2) Manoj Chandra Garg, Amity Institute of environmental sciences, Amity University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Usman Malik, Zaria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nishat Fatima, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manoj Chandra Garg, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Compliance of Physical-chemical Parameters of Canned Preserves from Solanum lycopersicum L. (Tomato) Marketed in the Chókwè City, Mozambique

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anil Kumar,Devi Ahilya University, India.

(2) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Mihai Iacob Benţea, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Cluj-Napoca (USAMV-CN), Romania.

(2) Pratibha D. Sharma, DRPCAU, India.

(3) Hemraj N. Patil, AISSMS College of Hotel Management & Catering Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mihai Iacob Benţea, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pratibha D. Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hemraj N. Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Varying Intra-Row Spacing and Mulching Effect on Growth and Yield of Parthenocarpic Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) under Protected Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nanik Setyowati, University of Bengkulu, Indonesia.

(2) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Nuzhat Bint Nazir, SKUAST-K, India.

(2) Monika Ray, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Elahe Kanani, Imam Khomeini International University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nuzhat Bint Nazir, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Monika Ray, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Food Expenditure Patterns and Nutritional Status of Rural Women: Evidence from Mulugu District, Telangana, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Tatjana Radosavljević, University of Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Pooja Krishna J, India.

(2) Ajit Kumar Dey, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Konne, Felix Eedee, Rivers State University, Nigeria.

(2) Sreeshma Pavithran, Manipal Academy of higher education, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pooja Krishna J, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ajit Kumar Dey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Teacher and Hearing-impaired Student Communication at SKH Negeri 01 Serang City

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Melissa G Wallang, India.

(2) Joei Ong Suk Mei, Malaysia.

(3) Polyxeni Mitsi, University of Ioannina, Greece.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Melissa G Wallang, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Joei Ong Suk Mei, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Polyxeni Mitsi, Greece) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Digital Transformation in Odisha’s Public Libraries through e-Granthalaya: An Analytical Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pescaru Maria, Pitesti University Center, Politehnica București National University for Science and Technology, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Mange Ram, University Librarian, India.

(2) Rico B. Orenia, Anglo Singapore International School, Philippines.

(3) Deepak Kumar Namdeo, Jawaharlal Nehru Krishi Vishwavidyalaya Jabalpur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lea C. Colbongan-Papays, University of Baguio, Philippines.

(2) M R Ramesh, Indira Gandhi Centre For Atomic Research, India.

(3) Sambhaji Gulabrao Patil, MET’s Institute of Engineering, Bhujbal Knowledge City, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mange Ram, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rico B. Orenia, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Deepak Kumar Namdeo, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA