Peer Review History: Trade Agreements and Export Performance of Bangladesh: A Gravity Model Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vasilii Erokhin, Harbin Engineering University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Adeyemo Oyindamola Olajumoke, Hensard University Toru-Orua Bayelsa State, Nigeria.

(2) R. Thamilmani, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Tecchnology, India.

(3) Md Kamrul Islam, Tripura University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Krishnakumar N. Bandolkar, Government College of Arts, Science & Commerce, Quepem, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adeyemo Oyindamola Olajumoke, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Thamilmani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Md Kamrul Islam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ayurvedic Perspectives and Interventions in Specific Learning Disorders: A Focus on Dyslexia and Dyscalculia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman,Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Pragya Sharma, G S University, India.

(2) Lawrence Chimbwali, University of Zambia, Zambia.

(3) VINAYAK GIRISH GALATAGE, RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERISITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE BANGALORE, INDIA.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pragya Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lawrence Chimbwali, Zambia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (VINAYAK GIRISH GALATAGE, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The AI Revolution in Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics: A Narrative Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Sumit Munjal, India.

(2) Adepu Srilatha, Panineeya Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, India.

(3) Harshal Bafna, Government Dental College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sumit Munjal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adepu Srilatha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Harshal Bafna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Establishing Standardized Procedure for the Administration of Anticoagulant Tablets via Nasogastric Tube: An In Vitro Estimation by RP-HPLC

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Doppalapudi Sandeep, Chebrolu Hanumaiah Institute Of Pharmaceutical Sciecnes, India.

(2) R Deveswaran, M.S.Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, India.

(3) Muhammad Irfan Bashir, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia.

(4) Susmita Chakrabarty, DRIEMS University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anilkumar J. Shinde, Bharati Vidyapeeth College of Pharmacy Kolhapur, India.

(2) Ghada Abd Alrhman Taqa, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(3) Khalida Ali Thejeel, Alkarkh University of science, Iraq.

(4) Lubna Alafandi, University of Aleppo, Syria.

(5) Precious Uahomo, Nigeria.

(6) Shyamalendu Tripathy, School of Pharmacy, Parul University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Doppalapudi Sandeep, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R Deveswaran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muhammad Irfan Bashir, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Susmita Chakrabarty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Augmented Project Management: Exploring the Role of AI Tools in Decision-making and Resource Optimisation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Dedy Simanungkalit, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Indonesia.

(2) Fershie D. Yap, President Ramon Magsaysay State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dedy Simanungkalit, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fershie D. Yap, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Case Report on Buteyko Breathing Technique and Deep Breathing Exercises for Enhancing Cardiac and Pulmonary Outcomes Post-CABG

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Indranil Sen, North Bengal Medical College and Hospital, India.

(2) Mustafa H. Ghazi, College of Nursing – Al-Muthanna University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Minati Choudhury, Cardiothoracic and Sciences Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Indranil Sen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mustafa H. Ghazi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hidden Hunger in Sahelian Cities: Nutrient Adequacy and Food Security in Urban Mali

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ferial Mohamed Abu- Salem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1)Swagata Ghoshal, India.

(2) Godhard Muiruri Kariuki, Kenya.

(3) Elizer m. Rebucas, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Santosh Kumar Singh, N. M. S. N. Dass (P.G.) College, Budaun Affiliated to M.J.P. Rohilkhand University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.76/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Swagata Ghoshal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Godhard Muiruri Kariuki, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Elizer m. Rebucas, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on Genetic Variability for Yield and Yield Contributing Traits in Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

(2) Prof. Levent SON levent, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Florin Sala,University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Romania.

(2) Aladji Abatchoua Madi Madi Ibram, University of Ebolowa, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asmaa Mansour Al-Hakeem, Al-Karkh University of Science, Iraq.

(2) Nanda C, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Florin Sala, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aladji Abatchoua Madi Madi Ibram, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Liquid Bioformulations on Mulberry Leaf Quality and Physiological Traits

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Aashish Gyawali, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Nepal.

(2) Bogdan-Vlad Avarvarei, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” Iasi University of Life Sciences, Romania.

(3) Nikki Huria, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Itlal Hakim AL-Masoody, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

(2) Nikki Huria, India.

(3) S. Lalitha, Periyar University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aashish Gyawali, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bogdan-Vlad Avarvarei, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nikki Huria, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Wetland Ecosystem Services using RAWES Approach: A Case Study of Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Isidro Alberto Pérez Bartolomé, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohd Bin Mahmud, Malaysia.

(2) Sakka Samudin, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amrit Dhakal, Prince of Songkla University, Nepal.

(2) K. Nagarathna, India.

(3) Md Rezaull Karim, Bangladesh.

(4) Sanya Kenaphoom, Rajabhat Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

(5) D. Shiva Kumar, University of Mysore, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohd Bin Mahmud, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sakka Samudin, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA