Peer Review History: Effect of crop residue management on Soil Microbiology, Nutrient Dynamics, and Growth Performance of wheat crop

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pankaj Kumar, Dolphin (PG) Institute of Biomedical and Natural Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Jibril Mohammed, Kwara State University, Nigeria.

(2) Nilima Pradeep Tidar, Mumbai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jibril Mohammed, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nilima Pradeep Tidar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Genetic Diversity in Maturity Duration among Pigeonpea Genotypes Grown under Off-season (Rabi) Conditions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Chitti Bharatkumar, University of Agricultural Sciences,India.

(2) Anise Jorfi, Khouzestan Applied Science University, Iran.

(3) S. Vishnupriya, UBKV, INDIA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aditi Chaudhary, College of Applied education and Health Sciences (CAEHS), India.

(2) Samir Khairi Lazim, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(3) Waikhom Jupiter Singh, South Asian Institute of Rural and Agricultural Management (SAIRAM), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chitti Bharatkumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anise Jorfi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Vishnupriya, INDIA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Budding Techniques in Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium L): Timing and Success

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Komal Shekhawat, Rajasthan Agricultural University, India.

(2) Anukiran Sahu, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K L Mokariya, Government Engineering College Valsad, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Komal Shekhawat, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anukiran Sahu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing Chilli Genotypes in Vertisols of Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Roxana Horoias, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Bucharest, Romania.

(2) Goitseone Malambane, Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Botswana.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Roxana Horoias, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Goitseone Malambane, Botswana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Gastric perforation secondary to trichobezoar: a case report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Prasanth T S, Kerala University of Health Sciences, India.

(2) Kanwar Singh Goel, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prasanth T S, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kanwar Singh Goel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Rural Farmers’ Perception and Utilization of Traditional Medicines in Imo State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md.Shajahan Kabir, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(2) Dr.  Wang Guangjun, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Reza Zargaran Khouzani, Iran.

(2) Nketia Anthony, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adv Saurav Narayan, Central University of Punjab, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1 /10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammad Reza Zargaran Khouzani, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nketia Anthony, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development and Consumer Assessment of Muskmelon-Enriched Soft Serve Ice Cream: A Sensory-Driven Investigation

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mustafizur Rahman, Sarat Chandra Sinha College of Agriculture (Assam Agricultural University), India.

(2) Srinivas H N, Bms Evening College of Arts and Commerce, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ayoade Rukayat Biodun, Ave Maria University, Nigeria.

(2) Binod Kumar Bharti, Sanjay Gandhi Institute of Dairy Technology (Bihar Animal Sciences University), India.

(3) Manal Mohammed El-Sayed Mohammed Shehata, Zagazig University, Egypt.

(4) Morris Terfa Aloysius, Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(5) Ruth Fosu, Food Research Institute, University of Ghana, Ghana.

(6) Sushma Ishwar Havanur, University of Horticultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mustafizur Rahman, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Srinivas H N, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Accommodative Changes in Myopic Patients with Asthenopic Symptoms: A Prospective Observational Study

Editor(s):

(1) Tatsuya Mimura, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Didik Wahyudi, Indonesia.

(2) Mahsa Rezasoltani, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Didik Wahyudi, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahsa Rezasoltani, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Reducing Brucella melitensis-Related Abortion in Nellore Ewes Using Oral Medroxyprogesterone Acetate

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Laleh Naraghi, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection,Iran.

(2) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Arman Abdous, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Kabuni Thomas Kabuni, Tanzania Livestock Research Institute, Tanzania.

(3) Sonu Kumar Yadav, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arman Abdous, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kabuni Thomas Kabuni, Tanzania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sonu Kumar Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mechanization of Groundnut Cultivation for Small Holder Farming Community

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Swathy Anija Hari Kumar, Western Sydney University, Australia.

(2) H S Pandey, ICAR- Indian Sugarcane Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Swathy Anija Hari Kumar, Australia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (H S Pandey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA