Peer Review History: Mapping the Landscape of Food Literacy: A Comprehensive Scoping Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Uttara Singh, Govt. Home Science College, Panjab University, IndiaDr. Uttara Singh, Govt. Home Science College, Panjab University, India

Reviewers:

(1) Arlene O. Abalos, Philippines.

(2) Winnie Achieng Odhiambo, The Mawego National Polytechnic, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rosemary Oluwayemisi Ahiakwo, Federal college of Education Technical, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Arlene O. Abalos, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Winnie Achieng Odhiambo, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of different bed disinfectants on economic traits of bivoltine hybrid mulberry silkworm (SK6×SK7) in Kishanganj district of Bihar

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) J. A. Chavan, Rajaram College, India.

(2) Simi Simon, Tumkur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kiran R, India.

(2) M.I. Delighta Mano Joyce, Sadakathullah Appa College, India.

(3) Savita Pravin Nalawade, D. P. Bhosale College, Shivaji University, India.

(4) Siripuk Suraporn, Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (J. A. Chavan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Simi Simon, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Formulation and Quality Evaluation of Jamun Fruit Incorporated Vegan Peanut Kefir

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Nelson Pérez Guerra, University of Vigo, Spain.

(2) Prof. Hudson Nyambaka, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

Reviewers:

(1) Moudi Aboubacar Mahamadou Rabiou, Ahmadu Bello University of Zaria, Nigeria.

(2) Israa A. A. Hamdan, AL-Mutnanna University, Iraq.

(3) Devhooti Upadhyay, Isabella Thoburn College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Moudi Aboubacar Mahamadou Rabiou, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Israa A. A. Hamdan, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Devhooti Upadhyay, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of IBA and rooting media on rooting of stem cuttings of dragon fruit [Hylocerous undatus (Haworth) Britton & Rose)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

(2) Prof. Irena Malinowska, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Muzafar Mir, Shere-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Jammu, India.

(2) Bhanu Murthy K C, Dr.YSR Horticultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muzafar Mir, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bhanu Murthy K C, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Total Domination Polynomials – A new approach

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, The University of Iowa,  , USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Amos Otieno Wanjara, Kaimosi Friends University, Kenya.

(2) Haitham Nashwan Mohammed, College of Computer Science and Mathematics, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(3) K.Dhilipkumar, KPR College of Arts Science and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bahru Tsegaye Leyew, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.

(2) Ebrahim E. Elsayed, Mansoura University, Egypt.

(3) Elumalai Muthaiyan, St. Joseph’s Institute of Technology, India.

(4) Madan Lal, Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University, India.

(5) Muntaha Kudhair abbas, Middle Technical University – Technical college of management, Iarq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amos Otieno Wanjara, Kenya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Haitham Nashwan Mohammed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (K.Dhilipkumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Case Presentation of Babesiosis in A Mongrel Cat

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Antonio Mastino, University of Messina, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Rashmi Singh, Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, India.

(2) Pashupathi M, Rani Lakshmi Bai Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ajeet Kumar, Bihar Animal Sciences University, India.

(2) Ch. Jyothi Sree, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, India.

(3) Kopparthi Jalajakshi, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University (SVVU), India.

(4) Nikolina Novakov, University of Novi Sad, Serbia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rashmi Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pashupathi M, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quality Improvement in Tomato through Integrated Application of Nano and Conventional Fertilizers in Mid-Hill Conditions of Himachal Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Hussein Abbas Jebur, Iraq.

(2) Farhan Ahmad, Padjadjaran University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Himanshu Verma, College of Agriculture & Environmental Technology, Surajmal University, India.

(2) Mu’minah, Pangkep State of Agricultural Polytechnic, Indonesia.

(3) Sandeep Bhardwaj, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hussein Abbas Jebur, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Farhan Ahmad, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Factors Influencing and Problems Faced by Farmers in the Adoption of Biostimulants in Dantiwada Taluka of Banaskantha District, Gujarat

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Anju Kumari Thakur , India.

(2) Era Lamba, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anju Kumari Thakur , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Era Lamba, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study on Consumer Buying Behaviour and Awareness of Infant Food Formula In Anand and Vidyanagar

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Shankar Singh bhakuni, BBD University, India.

(2) Georgi Angelov, Agricultural Academy, Institute of Cryobiology and Food Technologies, Bulgaria.

(3) Shamseen Raza, Mazoon College, Oman.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.27/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shankar Singh bhakuni, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Georgi Angelov, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shamseen Raza, Oman) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Spacing and Nano Urea Application on Growth and Flowering in Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Dr.  Maria Serrano, EPSO, University Miguel Hernández, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Rashmi R., India.

(2) Karthik D R, University of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rashmi R., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karthik D R, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA