Peer Review History: Impact of Bio Intensive IPM Components on Borer Complex in Sugarcane for Sustained Cane Production

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Maimom Soniya Devi, Central Agricultural University (I), India.

(2) Tadele Shiberu Teferi, Ambo University Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maimom Soniya Devi, India ) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tadele Shiberu Teferi, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Analysis of Microbiological Quality and Bioactive Compounds for Preparing Immune Boosting Gummies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pankaj Kumar, Dolphin (PG) Institute of Biomedical and Natural Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Meenal Gupta, Govt. Holkar Science College, Indore, India.

(2) Reza Eddin Owfi, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran.

(3) Andrei Felicia, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jayant Chandrakant Thorat, Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, India.

(2) Rajeshwari Ullagaddi, Sri Sathya Sai University for Human Excellence, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Meenal Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Reza Eddin Owfi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Andrei Felicia, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: R&D Factor Flow, Regional Innovation Efficiency and High-Quality Economic Development

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics,  China.

Reviewers:

(1) Inuwa Mukhtar Ahmad, Nigeria.

(2) Md Sumon Gazi, United states of America (USA).

(3) Nguyen Long Trieu, Banking University of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.06/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Inuwa Mukhtar Ahmad, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md Sumon Gazi, United states of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Nguyen Long Trieu, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Nano Fertilizers on Yield of Black Aromatic Rice (Oryzasativa L. indica)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Binayak Chakraborty, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Shahadat Hossain Khan, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

(2) Midde Sai Kumar, Malla Reddy University, India.

(3) Mandeep Kumar, Rama University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shahadat Hossain Khan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Midde Sai Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mandeep Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sustaining Educator Well-being: A Statistical Analysis of Fitness Trends in Public Schools

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College Of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohamed Prince M, Tamil Nadu Physical Education and Sports University, India.

(2) Habtamu Debasu Belay, Bonga University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohamed Prince M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Habtamu Debasu Belay, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Yeast Strain Diversity from Wild Edible Fruits for Wine Making Process

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tushar Ranjan, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rahul Kumar Banerjee, Balco Medical Centre, India.

(2) Sukanya Pramod Paricharak, Anekant Education Society’s College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Singh, Shri Venkateshwara University, India.

(2) Isabele Carrilho Jarros, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Brasil.

(3) Prerana Sahu, School of Pharmacy, Anjaneya University, Raipur & Rungta College of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Research, India.

(4) Shilpa Mahapatra, Scb Dental College And Hospital, India.

(5) Wadhah Mohammed Hadi Al-Qashbari, Dr. Ameen Nasher Higher Institute for Health Sciences, Yemen.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rahul Kumar Banerjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sukanya Pramod Paricharak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Clinical Significance of CT and MR Perfusion Imaging in Cancer Diagnosis: Techniques, Parameters, and Diagnostic Implications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ida Bagus Budhi Surya Adnyana, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Anil Kumar, Moradabad Educational Trust Faculty of Pharmacy, Groups of Institutions, Indi.

(2) M. Indhumathy, PSNA College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pauline Sharmila, Tagore College Of Nursing, India.

(2) Sunil Shamra, Rajasthan Technical University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anil Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Indhumathy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Stem Curriculum Design through Artificial Intelligence: A Comparative Study of Personalized Learning Algorithms in Secondary Education

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Arif, Southwest University, China.

(2) Nankong Achana Francis, Jain University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashokkumar Baldevbhai Prajapati, Soorajba College of Education, Kadi Sarva Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Deepti Jain, Rani Durgawati University, India.

(3) Eleni Mavropoulou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

(4) Elias M. Choueiri, Lebanese University, Lebanon.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Arif, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nankong Achana Francis, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Tracking Systemic Inflammatory Progression in Dogs: Blood Indices as Predictive Tools

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Bişar Amaç, Harran University, Türkiye.

(2) Luis Remedios Hernández, Cuba.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25 /10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bişar Amaç, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Luis Remedios Hernández, Cuba) | File 1 |File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Genetic Variability, Heritability and Genetic Advance in Analysis of Seed Quality Parameters in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Germplasm

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Praveenkumar, India.

(2) Sivasubramaniam K, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(3) Wiem Ben Amara, Tunis El Manar University, Tunisia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Praveenkumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sivasubramaniam K, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Wiem Ben Amara, Tunisia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA