Peer Review History: Discriminant and Multivariate Regression Analysis for Estimating Sex and Stature Model Using Upper Limb Anthropometric Measurements among the Yoruba Ethnic Group of Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University, Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Abdurrahman Khan, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Lakshmi Singh, Atal Bihari Bajpai University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammad Abdurrahman Khan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lakshmi Singh, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimising Service Delivery in State-Owned Energy Corporations: Examining Stakeholder Participation Strategies at Uganda Electricity Distribution Company Limited

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Andrew Aondohemba Chenge, Federal University Wukari, Nigeria.

(2) Chijioke Agupugo, Appalachian State University, USA.

(3) Darlington Ekechukwu, University of East London, United Kingdom.

(4) Khaleel Radhi Hasan Alzlzly, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.12/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Andrew Aondohemba Chenge, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chijioke Agupugo, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Darlington Ekechukwu, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Khaleel Radhi Hasan Alzlzly, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: HIV Seroprevalence and associated factors among inmates in Bamenda central prison: a cross-sectional study in the Northwest Region (NWR) amidst the socio-political crisis.

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Chidi L. C. Ndukwu, Federal University Otuoke, Nigeria.

(2) Yilkal Dagnaw Melesse, Debre Markos University, Ethiopia.

(3) Kimulu Ancent Makau, Machakos University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.26/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chidi L. C. Ndukwu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yilkal Dagnaw Melesse, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kimulu Ancent Makau, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mineralogical Characterization of Iron Ore Overburden: Sustainable Soil Remineralization through Circular Mining

Editor(s):

(1) Professor Cheng-Fu Yang, National University of Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ver Gabriel Albert Wuese, University of Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria.

(2) Krishna Prasad Kaphle, Tribhuvan University (TU), Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ver Gabriel Albert Wuese, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Krishna Prasad Kaphle, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: To What Extent Does Science Support the Recommendation of Cupping Therapy for Migraines? A Step toward Creating Guidelines Based on Evidence

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sachin Kumar Jain, Oriental University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Suleyman Ersoy, University of Health Sciences, Turkiye.

(2) Amit Gupta, Dr. B R Ambedkar University, India.

(3) Anitha B, Vivekananda Nursing Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suleyman Ersoy, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amit Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anitha B, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Teaching Learning Practices and its Challenges in Achieving Quality Education: A Study on Tertiary Education Institutions in Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shao-I Chiu, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sermin Agrali Ermis, Aydin Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, Turkiye.

(2) Diego da Silva, UniEnsino, Brasil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sermin Agrali Ermis, Turkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Diego da Silva, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Artificial Intelligence in Legal Practice: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Neha Munjal, Lovely Professional University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Diwash Kapil Chettri, Medhavi Skills University, India.

(2) Satya Kiranmai Tadepalli, Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology(A), India.

(3) Archana Balkrishna Yadav, Gujarat Technological University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.84/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Diwash Kapil Chettri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Satya Kiranmai Tadepalli, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Archana Balkrishna Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Strategic Regulatory Compliance and Service Delivery in Uganda’s State-owned Energy Sector: A Case Study of Uganda Electricity Distribution Company Limited

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. K J. Sreekanth, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) D. Poornima, Sri Ramakrishna Institute of Technology, India.

(2) Zhigao, Liao, Guangxi University of Science and Technology, China.

(3) Guillermo Domínguez Librado, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D. Poornima, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zhigao, Liao, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Guillermo Domínguez Librado, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Leadership Styles and Internal Communication Satisfaction as Predictors of Employee Commitment in Commercial Banks

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Alexandru Trifu, “Petre Andrei” University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Thu Thi Nguyen, Western Sydney University, Australia.

(2) Abdilkerim Asrar Seman, Werabe University, Ethiopia.

(3) Shaloo Manocha, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Thu Thi Nguyen, Australia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdilkerim Asrar Seman, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shaloo Manocha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hospitalizations Due to Covid-19 in a Public Hospital of Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), Brazil

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Jeevan Kumar Sharma, India.

(2) D Neha, Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Science, India.

(3) Rajkumari Vidyabati Devi, Jawaharlal Nehru Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(4) Peyman Esmaeili-Shahzade-Ali-Akbari, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jeevan Kumar Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D Neha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rajkumari Vidyabati Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Peyman Esmaeili-Shahzade-Ali-Akbari, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA