Peer Review History: Optimizing Variety and Sowing Date for Mustard-Boro Rice-fallow Cropping Pattern under Contrasting Land Elevations in the Haor Areas of Kishoreganj, Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

(2) Prof. Levent SON , The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Manoj Kumar Joshi,  Nepal.

(2) Gulay ZULKADIR, Mersin University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manoj Kumar Joshi,  Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gulay ZULKADIR, Turkey) | File 1 |File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Challenges in Managing Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia: A Case Series from a Resource-constrained Environment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Sumit Nandi, Gupta College of Technological Sciences, India.

(2) Sandhya Kadiru, Sophia College for Women (Empowered Autonomous), India.

(3) May Mohammed Ali Hussen, Sudan University of Science and Technology, Sudan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alea Farhan Salman, Mustansiriyah University, Iraq.

(2) Prashant Bhardwaj, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Medical University, India.

(3) Ramatu Mohammed-Nafi’u, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sumit Nandi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sandhya Kadiru, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (May Mohammed Ali Hussen, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: In vitro Antioxidant Bioactivity of Enzymatically-Produced Tilapia zillii and Oreochromis niloticus Muscle Protein Hydrolysates: Potential Application in Health and Nutrition

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Fawzy Ramadan Hasssanien, Umm Al-Qura University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Srisan Phupaboon, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

(2) Y. Shanti Prabha, Dr. V.S. Krishana Govt. Degree & PG College (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Srisan Phupaboon, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Y. Shanti Prabha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Determinants of Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Egypt: A GSEM Analysis of Socioeconomic Factors and Income Changes Mediation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Doan Van Dinh, Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

(2) Hanan Abdel kareem Abdel latif Elsaied, Suez Canal University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ayooluwade Ebiwonjumi, Adekunle Ajasin University, Nigeria.

(2) Abubakar Abdullahi Madaki, Federal Polytechnic Bali, Nigeria.

(3) Bapan Kalita, The Assam Royal Global University, India.

(4) Charles Wanjohi Ngari, Chuka University, Kenya.

(5) Fandio Rubin, University of Yaoundé 1, Cameroon.

(6) Jeremiah Savali Kilonzi, Meru University of Science and Technology, Kenya.

(7) Mohit Soni, Govt. Holkar Science College, India.

(8) Nathan Oigo mokaya, Masinde Muliro University of Science and technology, Kenya.

(9) Nimisha Mishra, Amity University Lucknow, India.

(10) Oluwaseyi Aliu, Prototype Engineering Development Institute – NASENI, Nigeria.

(11) Sanjay Kumar Mohanty, SAS, Vellore Institute of Technology, India.

(12) Zita Atzmardina, Tarumanagara University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Doan Van Dinh, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hanan Abdel kareem Abdel latif Elsaied, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_(Doan Van Dinh, Vietnam) v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_(Hanan Abdel kareem Abdel latif Elsaied, Egypt) v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Predictive Performance of Artificial Neural Networks and ARIMA Models for COVID-19 Case Forecasting in Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Hatice Nur Canpolat, Gazi University, Turkey.

(2) Gilbert Roland, Open Univesity Mauritius, Mauritius.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hatice Nur Canpolat, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gilbert Roland, Mauritius) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Investigating Professional Development and Teaching Efficacy among the Master of Science Graduates in Mathematics’ Curriculum

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) KOTTIN Assogba Evariste, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin.

(2) Rachel L. Rodriguez, Basilan State College, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (KOTTIN Assogba Evariste, Benin) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rachel L. Rodriguez, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Use of Task Cards in Science: Its Impact on the Academic Performance of Multigrade Pupils in Malabanig Elementary School

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Zuraihah Binti Ngadengon, Politeknik Muadzam Shah, Malaysia.

(2) Imranullah Akhtar, Alfalah University, Afghanistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashima Narang, Amity University Haryana, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zuraihah Binti Ngadengon, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Imranullah Akhtar, Afghanistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Strengthening Teacher Literacy and Numeracy Competencies through Academic Supervision Using Interactive Multimedia: A Mapping Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Cosmos Kwaku Nutakor, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Ghana.

(2) NG Chee Hoe, Teacher Education Institute of Malaysia, Malaysia.

(3) Elizer M. Rebucas, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amar Bahadur Sherma, The University of Texas at Arlington, U.S.

(2) Drzulkefli Daud, Malaysia.

(3) Jeverson Santiago Quishpe Gaibor, Salesian Polytechnic University, Ecuador.

(4) John Olayemi Okunlola, University of Johannesburg, APK Campus, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.94/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Cosmos Kwaku Nutakor, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (NG Chee Hoe, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Elizer M. Rebucas, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: English Proficiency among Teacher Education Students: A Basis for an Intervention Program

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Sajida Bhanu, BS Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science & Technology, India.

(2) Aini Faridah Azizul Hassan, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hernando L. Bernal Jr., FEU-NRMF, National Teachers College, Philippines.

(2) Shagufta Parween, Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. Sajida Bhanu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aini Faridah Azizul Hassan, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of the DPRD in Improving the Quality of Education in the Regions: Policy Analysis and Implementation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. E.Seda Koç, Namık Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Mark Kiiza, Uganda Martyrs University, Uganda.

(2) Udaya, India.

(3) Idrees Mahmud Gana, Edusoko University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mark Kiiza, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Udaya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Idrees Mahmud Gana, Nigeria) | File 1 |File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA