Peer Review History: Understanding the Motivation behind Students’ Pursuit of Nursing Education

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Ender Durualp, Ankara University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Huda Mohammed Rasheed, BUID, UAE.

(2) Istri Putra Kusumawati, Prof Ngoerah Hospital, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chukwu Lydia Ngozi, Yakubu Gowon University(Formaly Known As University Of Abuja), Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Huda Mohammed Rasheed, UAE) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Istri Putra Kusumawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Time-Base Accuracy Evaluation of Static, RTK, and PPK Surveys in Differential GNSS

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ibrahim Olatunji Raufu, Lead City University, Nigeria.

(2) Azi Amaechi Onele, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Carlo Artemi, Italy.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ibrahim Olatunji Raufu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Azi Amaechi Onele, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Characterization of Prevalent Agroforestry Practices and Common Fruit Tree Management in Erer District, Sitti Zone, Somali Region, Ethiopia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kant Chaturvedi, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Shuvo Kumar Basak, Bangladesh Army University of Engineering & Technology (BAUET), Bangladesh.

(2) Swatantra Yadav, CSAUA&T, Kanpur, India.

(3) Mudasir Iqbal, Govt. Degree College Shopian J&K-India, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shuvo Kumar Basak, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swatantra Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mudasir Iqbal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Visual “STAGED” Nomogram to Predict the Risk of Full Stomach in Adult Outpatients Undergoing Elective Sedated Upper Endoscopy

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero , Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjay Kumar, K L University Vijawada, India.

(2) Alfredo Chama Naranjo, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico.

(3) Sricharani P, Shri Vishnu Engineering College for Women(A), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aaron Don M. Africa, De La Salle University Manila, Philippines.

(2) Hayder Abbood Kori, College of Administration and Economics, University of Thi – Qar, Iraq.

(3) Mohammed Aboud Kadhim, Middle Technical University, Baghdad Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.04/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjay Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alfredo Chama Naranjo, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sricharani P, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: School Environment and Students’ Academic Performance: A Comparative Study of Public and Private Primary Schools in North 24 Paraganas District, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Jerome Lumanglas Hernandez, Western Philippines University, Philippines.

(2) Jordan Cabaguing, Eastern Samar State University Guiuan Campus, Philippines.

(3) Siti Nurqualbiah Mat Karim, Universiti Kebangsaan, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Syahrizal, S.Th.I, Syedza Saintika University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jerome Lumanglas Hernandez, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jordan Cabaguing, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Siti Nurqualbiah Mat Karim, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Fortification and Nutritional Profiling of Sports Bars Enriched with Prosopis cineraria (Sangria).

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Nelson Pérez Guerra, University of Vigo, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Praveen Tahilani, Sagar Institute of Research Technology & Science Pharmacy, India.

(2) Lakhvinder Kaur, MRIIRS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Praveen Tahilani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lakhvinder Kaur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Application of Sustainable Herbs as Therapeutic Substitutes for Treating Goat Scabies Infestations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Dhasarathan, Anna University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Manaswini Dehuri, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Katherine Bander Faraj, Basrah University, Iraq.

(3) S. Praveen, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adewale Oladele Talabi, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.

(2) Arlex Rodríguez Durán, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Colombia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manaswini Dehuri, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Katherine Bander Faraj, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Praveen, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence of Deep neck flexor weakness and Deep neck extensor tightness in college-going students suffering from Cervicogenic Headache

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Midhun Krishnan, SK Hospital, India.

(2) Prof.  Ashish Anand, University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Gokulakrishnan.J, Thanthai Roever College of Physiotherapy, India.

(2) Ivet Koleva, Medical University of Sofia, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aswinkumar S, Shree Venkateshwara College of Paramedical Sciences, College of Physiotherapy, The Tamil Nadu Dr.Mg.R Medical University, India.

(2) Francisco José Vera Serrano, University of Seville, Spain.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gokulakrishnan.J, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ivet Koleva, Bulgaria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unifying DevOps and MLOps Pipelines Via AI-driven Observability: A Mixed-Methods Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vishal K. Pandya, Shri V.J. Modha College of IT, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Joseph Aaron Tsapa, USA.

(2) Hirenkumar Mistry, USA.

(3) Yogesh Ramaswamy, Northeastern University, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mayank Dakoliya, SAGE University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joseph Aaron Tsapa, USA ) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hirenkumar Mistry, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Yogesh Ramaswamy, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Floral Diversity and its Role in Fostering Environmental Awareness: A College Based Survey Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

(2) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Raghupathi B, KSCSTE- Malabar Botanical Graden and Institute for Plant Sciences, India.

(2) Pradeepto Pal, College of Horticulture, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), India.

(3) Amit Lohar, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(4) Miss. Vandana Jangde, Jhada Sirha Government Engineering College, Chhattisgarh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.175/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Raghupathi B, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pradeepto Pal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amit Lohar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Miss. Vandana Jangde, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA