Peer Review History: Exploring the Effects of Large-scale Land Acquisition on Rural Agriculture and Livelihood Sustainability: A Case Study of Kuntanase, Ghana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Gerald Aranoff, Ariel University,  Israel.

Reviewers:

(1) Rukayat A. Olaoye, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

(2) Fatima Mandhu, ZCAS University, Zambia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Igbekoyi Kayode Emmanuel, Bamidele Olumilua University of Education, Science and Technology, Ikere-Ekiti, Nigeria.

(2) Soumahoro Megbe, Universite Jean Lorougnon Guede, Ivory Coast.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rukayat A. Olaoye, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fatima Mandhu, Zambia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biogenic Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles by Native Isolate of Trichoderma viride (NRT -1) and Its Effect on Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn Causing Sheath Blight of Rice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Foluso O. Osunsanmi, University of Zululand, South Africa.

Reviewers:

(1) Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Sukumar Debnath, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bekele Girma, Municipality of Bishoftu City, Ethiopia.

(2) Farkad Hawas Musa, University of Anbar, Iraq.

(3) Khadija Muktar Sukola, Kaduna State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sukumar Debnath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Maxillary Actinomycosis in a Crossbred Cow: A Case Report on Diagnosis and Treatment under Resource Constraints

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Eny Martindah, Indonesia.

(2) Olariu-Jurca Adrian, Banat’s University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Noor Abdulameer  Oudah, University of Kerbala, Karbala.

(2) Shanaz Bashir, Shere-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, India.

(3) Zeynep Kucuk Baykan, Pendik Veterinary Control Institute, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Eny Martindah, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Olariu-Jurca Adrian, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Edible Coatings on Post-harvest Shelf-life of Tomato Fruits

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh , Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ting Ung Hua, University of Technology Sarawak, Malaysia.

(2) Atefeh Bahmanzadegan, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A.R.Patil, Rajaram College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ting Ung Hua, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atefeh Bahmanzadegan, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Agrobacterium: An Economically Significant Plant Pathogen

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Tzasna Hernandez Delgado, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Hend Talat Eid Ibrahim, Plant Pathology Institute, Egypt.

(2) Falana Y. Olaitan, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Lopamudra Nayak, ICAR-Central Rice Research Institute, India.

(2) Osemudiamhen Destiny Amienghemhen, Brigham Young University, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hend Talat Eid Ibrahim, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Falana Y. Olaitan, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review on Acute Toxicity Studies of Azadirachta indica

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Suma B V, M.S Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Priyanka Verma, India.

(2) R. Ayesha Nimanthi Karunathilaka, University of Jaffna, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Priyanka Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R. Ayesha Nimanthi Karunathilaka, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The MMDA Program (Mmmm Makakabasa Din Ako): A Reading Intervention for the Primary Learners at Guinamgamman Elementary School

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) K. Vinay Kumar, Indian Institute of Information Technology Sri city, India.

(2) Salisu Tukur, Shehu Shagari College of Education, Nigeria.

(3) Neo Abell P. Obligar, University of San Jose-Recoletos (USJ-R) and Educators Of Negros Island Incorporated (EONII), Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (K. Vinay Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Salisu Tukur, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Neo Abell P. Obligar, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Harnessing IoT for Climate Action: Opportunities, Applications, and Challenges in Building a Sustainable Future

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Leandro A. Pasa, Campus Medianeira da Universidade Tecnologica Federal do Parana,  Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Shankar Lingam M, CDU, India.

(2) A.O Adewole, Abraham Adesanya Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(3) Seun Adeoye, University of The People, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K.AKILA, India.

(2) Tahmidul Huque, Bangladesh University of Business and Technology (BUBT), Bangladesh.

(3) Poonam Kukana, Chandigarh University, India.

(4) Santanu Purohit, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, India.

(5) Voruganti Bharath Kumar, St. Martin’s Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shankar Lingam M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A.O Adewole, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Seun Adeoye, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: RETScreen-based Techno-economic Study of Wave Energy Potential in Bonny Island, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aleksey  Khlopytskyi, Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Rikhi Ramkissoon, The University of the West Indies, West Indies.

(2) S. Bagyalakshmi, United Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eko Sasmito Hadi, Diponegoro University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rikhi Ramkissoon, West Indies) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Bagyalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Mulberry Wood: A Comprehensive Review of Properties, Applications and Sustainable Industrial Utilizations

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ulka Atul Devare, Savitribai PPhule Pune University, India.

(2) Sarvesh Kaushik Patel, Govt. Rajeev Lochan P.G. College, India.

(3) Richmond Acheampong, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ulka Atul Devare, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sarvesh Kaushik Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Richmond Acheampong, Ghana) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA