Editor(s):
(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:
(1) Yasemin Yildiz, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi, Turkiye.
(2) Babatunde Gbolahan Ogundunmade, Jos University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
(3) Ishita Mandal, Aliah University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yasemin Yildiz, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Babatunde Gbolahan Ogundunmade, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ishita Mandal, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):
(1) Prof. Emeritus Manuel Alberto M. Ferreira, Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:
(1) Rinku Raheja, National PG College Lucknow, An Autonomous NAAC Grade ‘A’ College of University of Lucknow, India.
(2) Abdelmajid QOURRICHI, Ibn Tofail University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdelmajid Qourrichi, Ibn Tofail University, Morocco.

(2) Helena Mukli Grillo, University “Aleksander Moisiu” Durres, Albania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rinku Raheja, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdelmajid QOURRICHI, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. E.Seda Koç, Namık Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Archan Mitra, Nitte Institute of Communication, India.

(2) Rinki Khatun, Baba Saheb Ambedkar Education University, India.

(3) Shafaq Rizwan, Kinnaird College for Women and University, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ave Maila D. Moscoso, University of Antique, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Archan Mitra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rinki Khatun, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shafaq Rizwan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof . M. Camino Escolar-Llamazares, University of Burgos, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Shahid Minhas, RMIT, Vietnam.

(2) Celso P. Resueño, Jr., Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ramyabrata Chakraborty, Srikishan Sarda College, India.

(2) Xiaodi Zhou, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, United States.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shahid Minhas, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Celso P. Resueño, Jr., Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business,Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Namrata Singh Panwar, India.

(2) Rakesh Bhati, ASM’s IBMR MBA Institute, India.

(3) Emmanuel David Oboro, Edwin Clark University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Silumbwe M Evance, University of Zambia, Zambia.

(2) Tomy Prasetia, The University of Western Australia, Australia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Namrata Singh Panwar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rakesh Bhati, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Emmanuel David Oboro, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine And University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Neha Singh, Dr. NTR University of Health sciences, India.

(2) Ghazwan Hasan Jasim, Alayn Iraqiya University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neha Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ghazwan Hasan Jasim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bikram Keshari Das, Kalinga Institute of Social Sciences, Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Prof .  Angélica Machi Lazarin, State University of Maringá,  Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Bibi Hafsa Azra, Maulana Azad National Urdu University, India.

(2) Ashish Wadekar, IBSS’s Dr. Rajendra Gode Institute of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Milohum Mikesokpo Dzagli, University of Lome, Togo.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bibi Hafsa Azra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashish Wadekar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Milohum Mikesokpo Dzagli, Togo) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Serpil Ünver Saraydın, Cumhuriyet University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Payal Jain, American International Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Esha Das, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Payal Jain, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Esha Das, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sam Said, Hospital Group Twente, Netherlands.

(2) Dr. Asmaa Fathi Moustafa Hamouda, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Vitor Augusto Queiroz Mauad, ABC Medical School, Brazil.

(2) Ikhlas Muhammad Jenie, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vitor Augusto Queiroz Mauad, Brazil) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ikhlas Muhammad Jenie, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Asmaa Ali Mohamed Ahmed, Ain Sham University, Egypt.

(2) Rishu Yadav, Maharaja Agrasen University, India.

(3) Mohd. Maruf Khan, Unani Medical College and Hospital, India.

(4) Agustin Joison, Cordoba Catholic University, Argentina.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Friday Saronee, Pamo University of Medical Sciences, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Asmaa Ali Mohamed Ahmed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rishu Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohd. Maruf Khan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Agustin Joison, Argentina) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA