Peer Review History: Compassion Satisfaction, Fatigue, and Burnout among Registered Nurses at Public Hospitals in Sindh, Pakistan

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, And University of Mississippi Medical Center, USA.

(2) Dr. Malar Kodi S., All India Institutes Of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Sampoornam. W, Bhavani College of Nursing, India.

(2) Dessalegn Haile, Debre Tabor University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sampoornam. W, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dessalegn Haile, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal Change_1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Elimination of Cadmium from Wastewater Using Modified and Unmodified Tea Waste in Kisii County, Kenya

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Angélica Machi Lazarin, State University of Maringá, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Upendra Prasad Tripathy, Pulp and Paper Research Institute, India.

(2) Anju Mangotra, Lovely Professional University, India.

(3) Dhananjay Jagannath Borkar, Anantrao Thopte College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.97/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Upendra Prasad Tripathy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anju Mangotra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dhananjay Jagannath Borkar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Post Emergence Herbicides on Productivity and Weed Dynamics of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Transplanted Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

(2) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Vineet Dheer, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Ashirbachan Mahapatra, Centurion University of Technology and Management, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vineet Dheer, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashirbachan Mahapatra, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal Change_1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Performance and Exhaust Emissions of a Single Cylinder Diesel Engine Fueled with Diesel and Plastic Oil Blends

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Oscar Jaime Restrepo Baena, National University of Colombia, Colombia.

Reviewers:

(1) Sumit Ramesh Raut, Jagadambha College of Engineering & Technology Yavatmal, India.

(2) Bhabani Prasanna Pattanaik, Hooghly Engineering & Technology College, Hooghly, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sumit Ramesh Raut, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bhabani Prasanna Pattanaik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic Analysis of Organic Strawberry Production Influenced by Biofertilizers and Biostimulants Application

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Radka Bozhinova, Agricultural Academy, Tobacco and Tobacco Products Institute, Bulgaria.

(2) Ivona Cristina Mazilu, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Radka Bozhinova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ivona Cristina Mazilu, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Financial Management Competence and SME Performance: Insights from Mbarara City, Uganda

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Feyisayo Ogunyemi Michael, Eastern Illinois University, United States of America.

(2) Mohammad Khaled Azzam, University Sains Malaysia, Jordan.

(3) Hafsatou Nawal Loua, Limkokwing University of Creative Technology, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Feyisayo Ogunyemi Michael, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohammad Khaled Azzam, Jordan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hafsatou Nawal Loua, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bioremediation of Crude Oil Contaminated Soil Enhanced with Water Hyacinth (Aquatic Macrophyte)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Idress Hamad Attitalla, Omar Al-Mukhtar University, Libya.

Reviewers:

(1) Syeda Sadaf Wajahat, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

(2) Himani Chandel, Shoolini University, India.

(3) Kshitij Bhikhubhai Dhameliya, RK University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syeda Sadaf Wajahat, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Himani Chandel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kshitij Bhikhubhai Dhameliya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Green Corrosion Inhibition of Aluminium in Acidic Environment Using Hibiscus sabdariffa Leaf Extracts

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chong Leong, Gan, Micron Technology Inc., Taiwan.

(2) Dr. D.B. Jani, Gujarat Technological University, GTU, Ahmedabad, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Milad Edraki, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Zriouel Wafaa, University Hassan II of Casablanca, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Milad Edraki, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zriouel Wafaa, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of an Ultrasonic Chicken Counter

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bharatish A, RV College of Engineering, Bengaluru, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Christian Chukwuemeka Nzeanorue, George Washington University, United States.

(2) Muhibul Haque Bhuyan, American International University Bangladesh (AIUB), Bangladesh.

(3) Meeniga Vijaya Lakshmi, G. Narayanamma Institute of Technology and Science (For Women), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Christian Chukwuemeka Nzeanorue, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhibul Haque Bhuyan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Meeniga Vijaya Lakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA