Peer Review History: Management of Major Insect Pests and Diseases in Groundnut through IPDM Modules

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Fábio da Costa Henry, State University of Northern of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) A.Akhil Reddy, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Anak Agung Istri Kesumadewi, Udayana University, Indonesia.

(3) Pongsathorn Tongkasee, Rajamangala University of Technology Isan, Thailand.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khairy Abdel-Maksoud Mohamed Abada, Cairo University, Egypt.

(2) Kuldeep Singh, Smt. Sugrata Wanjari Mahila Mahavidyalaya Wadoda, RTM University of Nagpur, India.

(3) Payal Bhautik, Priyadarshini College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A.Akhil Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anak Agung Istri Kesumadewi, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pongsathorn Tongkasee, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Novel Method for Information Hiding in Images

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Ayokunle Akinsanya, United States.

(2) Madubuike, Gilbert Okwuchukwu, Paul University Awka, Nigeria.

(3) Pemha Binyam Gabriel Cedric, University of Douala, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A Kathirvel, Saveetha Engineering College, India.

(2) Manu Mitra, University of Bridgeport, USA.

(3) S Mani.Kuchibhatla, ACE Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.23/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ayokunle Akinsanya, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Madubuike, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pemha Binyam Gabriel Cedric, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Revolutionizing Food Processing: Innovative Sustainable Technologies and Future Opportunities

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Miraji Hossein, University of Dodoma, Tanzania.

(2) Prof. Fernando José Cebola Lidon, Universidade Nova de Lisboa,,Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Behzad Mohammadi, Afagh Higher Education Institute, Iran.

(2) Eddy Silamat, Pat Petulai University, Indonesia.

(3) Mukesh Gangwar, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, BASU, India.

(4) Antonio André Chivanga Barros, ISPTEC, Angola.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aklilu Getahun Adema, Arba Minch University, Ethiopia.

(2) Antonio Andre Chivanga Barros, ISPTEC, Angola.

(4) Bruno Riccardi, University of Rome, Italy.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.12/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Behzad Mohammadi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eddy Silamat, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mukesh Gangwar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Antonio André Chivanga Barros,  Angola) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: AI-Driven Fault Injection Testing: Enhancing System Resilience with Automated Chaos Engineering

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Vinod Veeramachaneni, Colorado Technical University, USA.

(2) Pavan Nutalapati, RIT, USA.

(3) N Dinesh Kumar, Vignan Institute of Technology and Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chanpreet Kaur Gulati, MGM University, India.

(2) Harish Kumar Sriram, USA.

(3) Kenneth Besigomwe, Uganda Management Institute, Uganda.

(4) Prudhvi Naayini, USA.

(5) Seun Michael Oyekunle, Ekiti State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.74/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vinod Veeramachaneni, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pavan Nutalapati, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (N Dinesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Spatial Distribution Pattern and Diversity of Bryophyte & Lichen Biota in Pushpagiri Wildlife Sanctuary, Central Western Ghats, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Dhasarathan, Anna University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Dahmani Jamila, Ibn Tofail University, Morocco.

(2) Vicol Ioana, Institute of Biology, Bucharest, Romania.

(3) A Madhusudhana Reddy, Yogi Vemana University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rivoharifara Randrianarimanana, University of Antananarivo, Madagascar.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dahmani Jamila, Morocco) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vicol Ioana, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (A Madhusudhana Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Symptoms, Determinants and Coping Strategies: A Qualitative Study of Test Anxiety among Pre-service Teachers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Priti Sharma, FORE Academy of Management Education, India.

(2) Piyali Sarkar, Barabisha High School, India.

(3) M.S.Yogesh, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) C. Ashok Kumar, Sakthi Institute of Teacher Education and Research, India.

(2) Mohan Singh Saud, Far Western University, Nepal.

(3) Pratika Ayuningtyas, Politeknik Sawunggalih Aji, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Priti Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Piyali Sarkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (M.S.Yogesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Student Engagement in Blended Mathematics Learning: The Role of Perceived Teaching Performance and Critical Thinking Skills

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Ebute Ojonugwa Michael, Federal University of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Kabiru Faruk, Shehu Shagari University of Education Sokoto, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vincent L. Banot, Negros Oriental State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ebute Ojonugwa Michael, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kabiru Faruk, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Socio-Cultural and Economic Drivers of Youth Substance Use in Tamale, Ghana: A Qualitative Exploration

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

(2) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Babasola Kofoworola Maryam, Federal University of Health Sciences, Nigeria.

(2) Ahmad Fathulla Ahmad, Erbil College of Technical Management, Erbil Polytechnic University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Oluwaniyi, Abiodun Paul, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

(2) Suneel Kumar, Banaras Hindu University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Babasola Kofoworola Maryam, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmad Fathulla Ahmad, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Catch Per Unit Effort, Catch Composition and Economic Analysis of Fishing Gears Operating in Dal Lake: A Baseline Study for Fisheries Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chunhua Zhou, Yangzhou University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Wasim Khan, Pakistan.

(2) Muhammad Zohaib, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Angkasa Putra, Pukyong National University, Republic of Korea.

(2) Asfie Maidie, Mulawarman University, Indonesia.

(3) Carolyne Kerubo Guto, Technical University of Mombasa, Kenya.

(4) Husain Latuconsina, University Islam Malang, Indonesia.

(5) I Made Aditya Nugraha, Marine and Fisheries Polytechnic of Kupang, Indonesia.

(6) John I. Ukagwu, Alvan Ikoku Federal University Of Education, Nigeria.

(7) Masoud Seidgar, Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute, Iran.

(8) Melanie C. Villarao, Philippines.

(9) M. Seidgar, National Artemia Research Center, Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute, Iran.

(10) Nisha Rana, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

(11) Renante A. Diamante, Iloilo State University of Fisheries Science and Technology, Philippines.

(12) Yusuf Ja’afar, Federal University of Technology Minna, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Wasim Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Zohaib, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Would the Accuracy of Dental Apex Locators in Determining the Apical Constriction be Influenced by the Activation Sequence? An Ex vivo Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Sumit Mohan, Dental Institute. Rims, India.

(2) Shah Yashkumar Rajendra, Saraswati Dhanwantari Dental College and Hospital, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, Nashik, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ranjan Thapaliya, National Academy of Medical Sciences (NAMS), Bir Hospital, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sumit Mohan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shah Yashkumar Rajendra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA