Peer Review History: Rapidly Progressive Glomerulonephritis in Women: Clinical and histopathological Trends in Northwest Rajasthan, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Darko Nozic, General Hospital Acibadem Belmedic Belgrade, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Manoj Kumar, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, India.

(2) Mohd Arif, Career Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manoj Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mohd Arif, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on the Effect of Different Baking Temperature on Finger Millet Khari and It’s Cost Implication

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Gamal Saad El-Hadidy, Food Technology Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Adegbanke, Omolara Racheal, Federal University Of Technology, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gamal Saad El-Hadidy, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adegbanke, Omolara Racheal, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cultivated Meat: A Sustainable Alternative to Conventional Protein Source

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tatjana Radosavljević, University of Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Aman Tiple, India.

(2) Cayetano Navarrete-Molina, Technological University of Rodeo, Mexico.

(3) Shiv Kumar Shivandu, ICAR-IARI, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aman Tiple, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Cayetano Navarrete-Molina, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shiv Kumar Shivandu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ethnopharmacological Insights on Rubb-us-Soos (Glycyrrhiza glabra)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Kulkarni Dipali Manik, Yash Institute of Pharmacy, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, India.

(2) Pallabi Mahanta, Sri Sri College POF Ayurvedic Science and Research hospital, Sri Sri University, India.

(3) S.K.P. Waidyarathna, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

(4) Fatemeh Khakpour, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kulkarni Dipali Manik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pallabi Mahanta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S.K.P. Waidyarathna, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Fatemeh Khakpour, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ethnomedicinal Survey of Plants in Wani Region of District Yavatmal of Maharashtra, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. J. Rodolfo Rendón Villalobos, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) T.Purushoth Prabhu, C L Baid Metha College of Pharmacy, The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, India.

(2) H. M. Shadid Hossain Snigdha, Gopalganj Science and Technology University, Bangladesh.

(3) KPORVIE Atsu Kodjo George, University of Lomé, Togo.

(4) Sagar M, KLE College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (T.Purushoth Prabhu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (H. M. Shadid Hossain Snigdha, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (KPORVIE Atsu Kodjo George, Togo) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Sagar M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Molecular Identification of Microbacterium barkeri: A Novel Approach to Enhancing Tilapia Growth in Biofloc Systems

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nese Yilmaz, Istanbul University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhukya Bhaskar, India.

(2) Tijoy Lowore, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resource (LUANAR), Malawi.

(3) Hagar Fathy Saad Abdelatif Mohamed Forsan, Agricultural Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhukya Bhaskar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tijoy Lowore, Malawi) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hagar Fathy Saad Abdelatif Mohamed Forsan, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Community Based Mental Health Services in the Secondary Schools of Charaideo District, Assam, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhondwe Meghraj Ramchandra, Dr. Balasaheb Vikhe Patil Rural Medical College, India.

(2) Chanda Chansa Thelma, Chreso University, Zambia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhondwe Meghraj Ramchandra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chanda Chansa Thelma, Zambia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Adoption Behaviour and Economic Inspiration Level of Chrysanthemum Growers in Dharmapuri District of Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, Assistant Professor, Research Center and Post Graduate, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Niraj Kumar, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.

(2) Kumari Sandeep, Dr. Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niraj Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kumari Sandeep, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Wet Electrostatic Precipitators in Food Processing Plants

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hasan Köten, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Türkiye.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Muis Prasetia, Universitas Borneo Tarakan, Indonesia.

(2) Subhadip Nandi, Brainware University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdul Muis Prasetia, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Subhadip Nandi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Feasibility and Sustainability of a 100% Drug Prescription-fill Policy at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria: Implications for National Health and Drug Policies

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, College of Biomedical Sciences, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Akhilesh Patel, SGT College of Pharmacy, SGT University, India.

(2) Manisha Arora, Mercer School of Medicine, USA.

(3) Norshazlin Binti Md Zawawi, Shah Alam Hospital, Malaysia.

(4) S. Jeevanandham, Sree Abirami College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akhilesh Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manisha Arora, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Norshazlin Binti Md Zawawi, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (S. Jeevanandham, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised Manuscript v1 and Feedback v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA