Peer Review History: STEM Education and 21st Century Skills in Crisis: A Case Study of the COVID-19 Pandemic Response

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Durango, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Ibrahim Kamil Luttfi, Gezira University, Sudan.

(2) Zaheer Khan, AIOU, Pakistan.

(3) Sunil Kumar Baskey, Rabindra Bharati University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) I Putu Andre Suhardiana, Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar, Indonesia.

(2) Rajasekaran S, University of Technology and Applied Sciences – Ibri, Sultanate of Oman.

(3) Shahnila Tariq, University of Management and Technology Lahore, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ibrahim Kamil Luttfi, Sudan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zaheer Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sunil Kumar Baskey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Installation of a 24-hour Real-Time Surveillance System Using Wi-Fi Cameras, Solar Panels, and Laptops in the Female Hostels of the University of Cross River State

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. R.Hepzi Pramila Devamani, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Augustine Olugbenga Folorunso, Bells University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) K.Malathi, Saveetha Engineering College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdullah All Mamun Anik, School of Computing and Engineering, University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom.

(2) Nitin Laxman Ahirem, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(3) T Bhanu Teja, National Institute of Technology Goa, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Augustine Olugbenga Folorunso, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K.Malathi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Patient Preferences for the Mode and Frequency of Drug Formulations for Treating Adults with Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Review Protocol

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Salem Nasralla Saleh, Primary Health Care Corporation Qatar, Qatar.

Reviewers:

(1) Qurrat-ul-Ain Bukhari, Altamash Institute of Dental Medicine, Pakistan.

(2) Vandana Avinash Badar, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College, Nagpur, India.

(3) Gaurav Agarwal, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Samra Subhani, The University of Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Qurrat-ul-Ain Bukhari, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vandana Avinash Badar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gaurav Agarwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Generalized Jacobsthal-Narayana Numbers and Generalized Co-Jacobsthal-Narayana Numbers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Mujtaba Shaikh, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) V. Pandichelvi, Urumu Dhanalakshmi College, India.

(2) Sateesh Kumar Deevi, Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S.Devibala, Sri Meenakshi Govt Arts College for Women(A), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V. Pandichelvi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sateesh Kumar Deevi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: From Framework to Practice: Barriers and Enablers to RMF Adoption in Mid-sized Enterprises

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Piyush Raja, India.

(2) Muhammad Zunnurain Hussain, Bahria University Lahore Campus, Pakistan.

(3) R.Priscilla Joy, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aradhana Sahu, Rungta College of Engineering and Technology, India.

(2) Slim Chtioui, Tunisia.

(3) W Sarada, RBVRR Women’s College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Piyush Raja, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Zunnurain Hussain, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (R.Priscilla Joy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Adsorptive Removal of Oils from Oil Spillage: Kinetic and Isotherm Studies Using Raw and Chemically Modified Pentaclethra macrophylla Seed Pods

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bikram Keshari Das, Kalinga Institute of Social Sciences, Deemed to be University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Koplamma Nenchini Bala, Admiralty University, Nigeria.

(2) Aduloju Emmanuel I, University Sains, Malaysia.

(3) Kavita Gour, RTMNU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Koplamma Nenchini Bala, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aduloju Emmanuel I, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kavita Gour, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Evaluation of the Types, Growing Conditions, and Production Process of Millet Based on Botanical Features

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chunhua Zhou, Yangzhou University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Abeer A. Ahmed, Field Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

(2) Widad M. Taher Al-Asadi, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abeer A. Ahmed, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Widad M. Taher Al-Asadi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Ibadan Experience

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine and University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Blagica Krsteska, University Ss.Cyril and Methodius in Skopje, North Macedonia.

(2) Muhammad Arsalan Khan, Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Blagica Krsteska, North Macedonia ) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Arsalan Khan, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of Physicochemical and Sensory Properties of Local Sesame Tahini

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Raffaella Preti, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Jelang Jelku D. Sangma, College of Community Science, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Palash Manoj Thakre, Kamla Nehru Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Amir, Bahauddinn Zakaria University, Pakistan.

(2) Sadiq    Ismaila  Shina, Federal University Dutse, Nigeria.

(3) Usman Ahmad, Federal Directorate Of Education Islamabad, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jelang Jelku D. Sangma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Palash Manoj Thakre, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Project Management Information System (PMIS) on Project Management Practices in Delta State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pescaru Maria, Pitesti University Center Politehnica București National University for Science and Technology, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Ezeala George, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(2) Shilpa Narang, Canterbury Institute of Management, Australia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhdin Zeyne Shifa, Werabe Universityz, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ezeala George, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shilpa Narang, Australia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA