Peer Review History: An Economic Study on the Production Enhancement of Scented Rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Uttar Pradesh’s Central Plain Zone Using Bio Fertiliser, Organic Manure, and Micronutrients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Gomal University, Pakistan.

(2) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) A S Sochipem Zimik, SRM University Sikkim, India.

(2) Amit Kumar Mohapatra, Sambalpur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A S Sochipem Zimik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amit Kumar Mohapatra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ecology and Biological Interactions of Parasitic Organisms: An Overview of Key Dynamics and Control Strategies

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Alice Pereira Berbigier, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Brazil.

(2) DRIOUCHE Youssouf, Environmental Research Center, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alice Pereira Berbigier, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (DRIOUCHE Youssouf, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of the 2020 Farm Reform Bills: Gaps in MSP and their Impact on Farmers’ Welfare in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kleopatra Nikolopoulou, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) D.A. Nithya Shree, University of Agricultural Sciences, Karnataka, India.

(2) Mukta Goyal, Manvi Institute of Education and Technology(SCERT), India.

(3) Amit Das, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D.A. Nithya Shree, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mukta Goyal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amit Das, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Performance of Different Organic Nutrient Management Schedules on Growth, Physiological and Yield Attributes of Sprouting Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Martini Mohammad Yusoff, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Esraa Abd-alhuseein Jasim, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Martini Mohammad Yusoff, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Esraa Abd-alhuseein Jasim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hands-on Guide to Sample Size Calculation in Medical Research Using EZR

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Talha Bin Emran, BGC Trust University Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Oleksandr Ocheredko, Pirogov’s Vinnytsia National Medical University, Ukraine.

(2) Danish Fayaz, Islamic University Of Science And Technology, India.

(3) Junaid Ahmad Bhat, University of Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oleksandr Ocheredko, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Danish Fayaz, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Junaid Ahmad Bhat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Forests in the Anthropocene: Addressing Climate Change Impacts on Ecosystem Dynamics

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anthony R. Lupo, University of Missouri, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanju Purohit, Akamai University, USA.

(2) Asma Khan Kakar, University of Balochistan, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanju Purohit, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asma Khan Kakar, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Asma Khan Kakar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of Temperature Trends and Frequency of Cold and Heat Waves in Plain and Hill Zones of Uttarakhand, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dalong Guo, Henan University of Science and Technology, People’s Republic of China.

Reviewers:

(1) Gazi Mamunar Rashid, Phultala Mozam Maholder College, Bangladesh.

(2) Biruk Getaneh Ayele, Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gazi Mamunar Rashid, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Biruk Getaneh Ayele, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Study of Dry Direct Seeded and Transplanted Rice in the Eastern Part of Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Shilpi Bera, The Neotia University, India.

(2) S.M. Rahaman, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shilpi Bera, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S.M. Rahaman, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of Mupirocin and Fusidic Acid as a Topical Therapy on Staphylococcal Pododermatitis in Dogs

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) C.S.Arunaman, Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, India.

(2) Shahrazad M.J. Al-Shadeedi, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(3) Adriana Amfim, Spiru Haret University, Romania.

(4) Hamzeh Mohtashamipour, Shahid Chamran University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (C.S.Arunaman, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shahrazad M.J. Al-Shadeedi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Adriana Amfim, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Hamzeh Mohtashamipour, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA