Peer Review History: Growth Performance, Biochemical Parameters, and Cost-benefit Analysis of the African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Juveniles Fed Diets with Varying Levels of Orange Fleshed Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas) Peels

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Matheus Ramalho de Lima, Federal Rural University of Semi-Arid, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Dhruti P. Kotadiya, Kamdhenu University, India.

(2) Thaise Dalferth Zancan, Federal University of Rio Grande, Brazil.

(3) Pande Ayu Naya Kasih Permatananda, Universitas Warmadewa, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ana Regina Nascimento Campos, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG), Brasil.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dhruti P. Kotadiya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thaise Dalferth Zancan, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pande Ayu Naya Kasih Permatananda, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Addition of Dahlia Tuber Extract and Bacillus subtilis Encapsulation in the Ration on Blood Fat Profile of Broiler Chickens

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Porfirio Nicolas Lopez, Autonomous University of Tlaxcala, Mexico.

(2) Monika Madheswaran, ICAR- Indian Veterinary Research Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sagar Narendra Ande, Dr. Rajendra Gode Institute of Pharmacy, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Porfirio Nicolas Lopez, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Monika Madheswaran, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Farmyard Manure and Potassium on Nutrient Content and Quality of Kharif Groundnut (Var.- TG-37A) Grown in Loamy Sand

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Asma Hanif, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) S.Mohandas, Agrl. College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agrl. University, India.

(2) Oluwaseun A. Akinyele, Federal College of Agriculture, Nigeria.

(3) Ambika Prasad Mishra, Sri Sri University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P.Chitra, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.56/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S.Mohandas, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oluwaseun A. Akinyele, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ambika Prasad Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nanotechnology-Based Approaches for the Removal of Emerging Contaminants from Water: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Himansulal  Nayak, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Bonface Manono, Colorado State University; South Eastern Kenya University, USA.

(3) Shamsheera K O, KAHM Unity Women’s College, India.

(4) Kadhim Jawad Lafta, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Vu Thi Ngoc Anh, Joint Russian-Vietnamese Tropical Research and Technology Center – Southern Branchm, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Himansulal  Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bonface Manono, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shamsheera K O, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Kadhim Jawad Lafta, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Association Analysis and Correlation Studies in Upland Rice (Oryza sativa)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Binayak Chakraborty, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, West Bengal, India.

Reviewers:

(1) S Vishnupriya, Uttar Banga Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Victor Manuel de Jesus Canche Ek, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kou Hayakawa, Japan.

(2) Kukuh Setiawan, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S Vishnupriya, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Victor Manuel de Jesus Canche Ek, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cutaneous Leiomyosarcoma: Clinical Presentation, Histological Diagnosis, and Surgical Management

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Siamak Alizadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Neagu Tiberiu Paul, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Siamak Alizadeh, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neagu Tiberiu Paul, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on Genetic Diversity and Character Associations in Traditional and Indigenous Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes Under Rainfed

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) A. Anisha, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(2) Waikhom Jupiter Singh, South Asian Institute of Rural and Agricultural Management (SAIRAM), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A. Anisha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Waikhom Jupiter Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrated Pest and Disease Management in Cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Langa Tembo, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

Reviewers:

(1) Tajamul Islam, India.

(2) George Timothy Opande, Kaimosi Friends University, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ali Kareem Al-Taae, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(2) Majid A. Ibrahim, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(3) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(4) Salah K Jubarah, University of Juba, Republic of South Sudan.

(5) Senthil Kumar J, PSG College of Arts & Science, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tajamul Islam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (George Timothy Opande, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Big Data Analytics in Climate Smart Agriculture: A Social Science Perspective

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Babasaheb Dnyandeo Patil, Bharati Vidyapeeth, Institute of Management and Rural Development Administration, India.

(2) Shifadjzic Khan, Kyungpook National University, South Korea.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Biswajit Mallick, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Ciocnitu (Stoiconi) Claudia Ramoma, University of Oradea, Romania.

(3) Ion Ganea, Technical University of Moldova, Republic of Moldova.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Babasaheb Dnyandeo Patil, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shifadjzic Khan, South Korea) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Groundwater Quality Assessment for Drinking and Agricultural Use in Motipur Block, Muzaffarpur District, Bihar, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. LUO Ching-Ruey, National Chi-Nan University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Fares F.Fathi, Benghazi University, Libya.

(2) Tarini Chandrasekhar, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashvin Wickramasooriya, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

(2) Chinthala Krupavathi, Loyola Polytechnic (YSRR) College, India.

(3) Pamela Ifeoma Okeke, Alvan Ikoku Federal University of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fares F.Fathi, Libya) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tarini Chandrasekhar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA