Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Ali Abbas Hashim Almaidi, Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, University of Maysan, Iraq.

(2) Popa Alin, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ali Abbas Hashim Almaidi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Popa Alin, Romania) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dalong Guo, Henan University of Science and Technology, People’s Republic of China.

Reviewers:

(1) Ankita Sharma, Agriculture University Jodhpur, India.

(2) Partha Pratim Kalita, Assam down town University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Farooq Ahmad Khan, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir (SKUAST-K), India.

(2) Mykola Kovalov, Central Ukrainian National Technical University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ankita Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Partha Pratim Kalita, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Padam Singh, VCSG UUHF Bharsar, India.

(2) Manish kumar, Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Padam Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manish Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Fortunato Garza Ocañas, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon, Mexico.

(2) Mahrous Abd El-baset Attia, Field Crops Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Egypt.

(3) S. Vishnupriya, Uttar Banga Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Audu Muhammad Abba Isah, Federal University of Technology Minna, Nigeria.

(2) Prabha, Kanya Maha Vidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.06/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fortunato Garza Ocañas, Mexico) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahrous Abd El-baset Attia, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. Vishnupriya, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Flora, St. Mary’s College (Autonomous), Thoothukudi,, India.

(2) Idrees Hussein Mola Saleh, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P.Chitra, Avinashilingam Institute for Home Science and Higher Education for Women, India.

(2) Radka Bozhinova, Agricultural Academy, Tobacco and Tobacco Products Institute, Bulgaria.

(3) Shubham Yadav, Sardar Vallabhbhai Pate University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(4) Swatantra Yadav, CSAUA&T, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Flora, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Idrees Hussein Mola Saleh, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Abha Chandra, Integral University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nagula Praveen, Osmania Medical College, India.

(2) Prince Tongor Mabey, Njala University, Sierra Leone.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Samuel Joseph Bebeley, Njala University – Bo Campus, Republic of Sierra Leone.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nagula Praveen, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prince Tongor Mabey, Sierra Leone) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Leo Willyanto Santoso, Petra Christian University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Adari Ramesh, ACU(Adichunchunagiri University), India.

(2) Atul Kumar, Chandigarh University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pillai Lekshmi Ashokan, Pondicherry University, India.

(2) Swapnil Singh, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Adari Ramesh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Atul Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Shirly O. Agcaoili, Cagayan State University, Philippines.

(2) Huda Jamal Jumaah, Northern Technical University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hakeem Muyiwa Olujide, Federal Polytechnic Ede, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shirly O. Agcaoili, Philippines) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Huda Jamal Jumaah, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Turyasingura Benson, Kabale University, Uganda.

(2) Zahid Hussain Mirani, Institute of Education and Research Studies, Pakistan.

(3) Philippe Malick DIONE, Assane Seck University of Ziguinchor, Senegal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ifeanyi Michael Smarte Anekwe, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.

(2) Waseem Ahmed Khattak, Quaid-i-Azam University , Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Turyasingura Benson, Uganda) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zahid Hussain Mirani, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Philippe Malick DIONE, Senegal) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Aamir Al-Ghareebawi, College of Veterinary Medicine, Al-Shatrah University (South of Iraq), Iraq.

(2) Marinela Enculescu, Research and Development Institute for Bovine Balotesti, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adeeba Naseer, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

(2) Jonali Devi, SKUAST-J, India.

(3) Srinivas Reddy Bellur, Veterinary College, KVAFSU, India.

(4) Sunil Arora, Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aamir Al-Ghareebawi, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marinela Enculescu, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA