Editor(s):
Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
The peer review history will be available very soon.
Author Archive: admin
Peer Review History: Optimum Culture Conditions of Microbial Isolates Obtained from Pap Processing Waste for Cellulase Production
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Héctor Manuel Mora Montes, Universidad de Guanajuato, México.
Reviewers:
(1) Oluyemisi Omonije, Federal University of Technology, Niger.
(2) Raghad Nawaf Gergees Alzaidy, University of Mosul, Iraq.
(3) Alyaa Abdelwahab Adly Ghaita, Suez Canal University, Egypt.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Aparna Gunjal, Dr. D. Y. Patil, Arts, Commerce & Science College, India.
(2) Gayatriben Bhagavandas Patel, SMMPISR, KSV, India.
(3) Gyanu Raj Pandey, Nepal.
(4) Mintu Ann Varghese, India.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.62/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Oluyemisi Omonije, Niger) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raghad Nawaf Gergees Alzaidy, Iraq) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Alyaa Abdelwahab Adly Ghaita, Egypt) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Analysis of the Influence of Work Environment on Employee Job Satisfaction at the Medan Middle Tax Service Office
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.
(2) Dr. Maria Ciurea, University of Petrosani, Romania.
(3) Dr. Chan Sok Gee, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.
Reviewers:
(1) Isaac Aondofa Agber, Godfrey Okoye University, Nigeria.
(2) Haryono Umar, Perbanas Institute, Indonesia.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Isaac Aondofa Agber, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Haryono Umar, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Financial Feasibility Analysis of Hydroponic Vegetable Farming in Sambutan District, Samarinda City, Indonesia
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of Veracruz, Mexico.
Reviewers:
(1) Niraj Kumar, Junagadh Agricultural University, India.
(2) Bipana Yogi, Himalayan College of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Nepal.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) M. Rajalakshmi, Mahalakshmi Women’s College of Arts And Science, India.
(2) Utkarsh Ghate, India.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niraj Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bipana Yogi, Nepal) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Time Series Analysis of Google Online Search Trends and Reported Cases of HIV in Nigeria
Editor(s):
(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, Mississipi, USA, University of Mississipi Medical Center, Mississipi, USA.
(2) Prof. Akmal Nabil Ahmad El-Mazny, Cairo University, Egypt.
Reviewers:
(1) Prabhakar Akurathi, Siddhartha Medical College, Vijayawada. / Dr.NTR University of Health Sciences, India.
(2) V. Sudha Rani, Osmania Medical College, India.
(3) Renato E. Apa-ap, Polytechnic University of The Philippines, Philippines.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Oyedele Abimbola Ojeniyi, Dominion University, Ibadan, Nigeria.
(2) Umar N. Jibril, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prabhakar Akurathi, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V. Sudha Rani, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Renato E. Apa-ap, Philippines) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Journal Change_1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Immune Response and Vaccine Strategies in Leishmaniasis: Insights and Challenges
Editor(s):
(1) Prof. Ahmed Kamal Dyab, Assiut University, Egypt.
(2) Dr. Hiba Riyadh Al-Abodi, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq.
Reviewers:
(1) Mostafa Gholamrezaei, Iran.
(2) Allah Bux Kachiwal, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan.
(3) Satheesh Natarajan, KwaZulu Natal University, South Africa.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Biliyaminu Ado, Jigawa State College of Education, Nigeria.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mostafa Gholamrezaei, Iran) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Allah Bux Kachiwal, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Satheesh Natarajan, South Africa) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Challenges and Advances in Cervical Cancer Prevention for HIV-positive Individuals: A Review of ART Efficacy, HPV Screening and Vaccination Strategies
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.
Reviewers:
(1) Joseph Kamaloni, Evelyn Hone College of Applied Arts and Commerce, Zambia.
(2) Bengü Mutlu Sütcüoğlu, Ankara Atatürk Sanatoryum Research and Training Hospital, Turkey.
(3) Samuel JustinRaj C, India.
Additional Reviewers:
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.3/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joseph Kamaloni, Zambia) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bengü Mutlu Sütcüoğlu, Turkey) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Samuel JustinRaj C, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Review of Characterization and Testing Methods for the Mechanical, Microstructure, Pore, Permeability and Freeze-Thaw Properties of Porous Concrete
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. D.B. Jani, Gujarat Technological University, GTU, Ahmedabad, India.
Reviewers:
(1) Pooria Kianoush, Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch, Iran.
(2) Lindelwa Siwisa, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Israa Rahman Ghanim, Iraq.
(2) Mohammad Hossain Jalal Kamali, University of Gonabad, Iran.
(3) Patel Dixitkumar Bharatbhai, Silver Oak University, India.
(4) Pooria Kianoush, Islamic Azad University South Tehran Branch, Iran.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pooria Kianoush, Iran) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lindelwa Siwisa, South Africa) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Carbon-Neutral Synergy: Integrated Optimization of Energy-Water-Pollution Nexus in China’s Construction Sector
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Aleksey Khlopytskyi, Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology, Ukraine.
Reviewers:
(1) Ajim Shabbir Sutar, D. Y. Patil College of Engineering and Technology, India.
(2) Abhiram Reddy Anireddy, United States of America.
(3) Anthony Rahul Golden S, St. Xavier’s College (Autonomous), Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, India.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) B. Babu, Indra Ganesan College Of Engineering, India.
(2) Emmanuel Udomiaye, Alex Ekweme Federal Univewrsity, Nigeria.
(4) Hamzokhan Tagar, Pakistan.
(5) Shelley Oberoi, KC College of Engineering & Management Studies & Research, India.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ajim Shabbir Sutar, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhiram Reddy Anireddy, United States of America) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anthony Rahul Golden S, India) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA
Peer Review History: Engineering the Future: Nanoparticle-Based Approaches for Efficient Gene Transfer
Editor(s):
(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.
Reviewers:
(1) Firoozeh Chamandoosti, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Iran.
(2) Shafiq Ur Rehman, Gomal University, Pakistan.
(3) Piyush Kumar, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, India.
Additional Reviewers:
(1) Neha Verma, SR Group of Institutions, India.
Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)
Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here
Specific Comment:
Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10
Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10
Peer Review History:
Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Firoozeh Chamandoosti, Iran) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shafiq Ur Rehman, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA
Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Piyush Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2
Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2
Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA