Peer Review History: Mapping of Climate Change Impact through the Climate Vulnerability Index in India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Salisu Audu Baba, College of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Sunil Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(3) Marcele Salles Martins, Federal University of the Southern Border, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Salisu Audu Baba, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sunil Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Marcele Salles Martins, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Impact of Stakeholder Involvement on Project Delays

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ayoub Azzayani, Mohammed V University, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Taha, Egypt.

(2) L Shri Harsha (Retd), NALSAR University of Law, India.

(3) Sahil Kumar Arora, Maldives.

(4) D. Suresh, VSB Engineering College, Karur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daniel  Kamaru Adamu, University of Jos,Jos,  Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.63/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed Taha, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (L Shri Harsha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sahil Kumar Arora, Maldives) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (D. Suresh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Field Evaluation of Six Plantain Cultivars for Response to Pseudocercospora fijiensis Incidence and Severity and their Yield, Bas-Fleuve Region, Democratic Republic of Congo

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy

Reviewers:

(1) Ogunoye, Olalekan Ajibolade, Nigeria.

(2) Forkwa Etienne Yong, University of Buea, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) C. Vaishnavi, ICAR-IARI, India.

(2) Muktar Bedaso Kuyu, Jimma University, Ethiopia.

(3) Praveen Kumar Yadaw, Kalinga University, India.

(4) V. Parthasarathy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ogunoye, Olalekan Ajibolade, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Forkwa Etienne Yong, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing the Spatio-temporal Pattern and Analysis of Obstacles to Rural Revitalization in China’s Yangtze River Delta Region

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Michel Mainguenaud University Avenue, France.

Reviewers:

(1) Tatar Marius Alexandru, Babes-Bolyai University Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

(2) Abimbola Omolabi, Lagos State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abimbola Omolabi, Lagos State University, Nigeria.

(2) R. Siti Rukayah, Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tatar Marius Alexandru, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abimbola Omolabi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Examining the Application of Coating Methodologies and Surface Analysis Post- machining Low Carbon Steel

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Lamsoudi Redouane, Regional Center for Education and Training Professions Casablanca-Settat, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Jesus Rafael Gonzalez Parra, Instituto de Fisica, Mexico.

(2) R.Yokeswaran, K.Ramakrishnan College of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Juri Saedon, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jesus Rafael Gonzalez Parra, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R.Yokeswaran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Investigating the Optical Band Gap of Various TiO2 Thin Films and MAPBI Perovskite Using UV-Vis Spectroscopy and Tauc Plot Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Asst. Prof. Natt Makul, Phranakhon Rajabhat University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehran Hosseinzadeh Dizaj, Tehran Azad University Central Branch, Iran.

(2) Angshuman Khan, University of Engineering & Management, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aloke Kumar Das, Jadavpur University, India.

(2) Saeed Salehpour, Golestan University, Iran.

(3) Sushil Kumar Singh, Vivekananda College Of Technology & Management, India.

(4) Ahmad Umar, Najran University, Saudi Arabia, And The Ohio State University, USA.

(5) Amani K. Hussein, University of Technology, Iraq.

(6) Kavitha M V, Sree Narayana College Nattika, University of Calicut, India.

(7) Kawther Ali Khalaph, Ibn Sina University of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Iraq.

(8) Taame Abraha Berhe, Adigrat University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehran Hosseinzadeh Dizaj, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Angshuman Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Innovative Debt Management Strategies on Financial Performance of Commercial Banks: A Case of Selected Commercial Banks in Mbarara City, Uganda

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Arzu Alvan Bozdereli, Cyprus Science University, Cyprus.

Reviewers:

(1) Tsegay Gebremedhin Berhe, Ethiopia.

(2) Ra’ed Masa’deh, The University of Jordan, Jordan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eleazer Fianko Ofei, Accra Institute of Technology, Ghana.

(2) Henny Saida Flora, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tsegay Gebremedhin Berhe, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ra’ed Masa’deh, Jordan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Waxy-Sweet White Corn (Zea mays L. var. ‘Sweet Pearl F1’) Applied with Different Concentrations of Brown Macroalgae (Sargassum spp.)-Based Concoction

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anil Kumar, Devi Ahilya University, India.

(2) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Meluca Cristina, România.

(2) S. Bala Murugan, Sri Venkateswaraa University, India.

(3) Wasan Salih Hussain, Mosul University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jwan.N.Abood, University of Samarra, College of Education, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Meluca Cristina, România) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Bala Murugan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Wasan Salih Hussain, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bacteriological Assessment of Air Sample in Poultry Environment

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Simone Aquino, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Egwurochi, Wilson Iheukwumere, Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) Berna Krikor Jilenkerian, Tishreen University, Syria.

(3) T. Elizabeth Thangamani Sunitha, St. Xavier’s College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Geoffrey Saah Botchway, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.

(2) Teshome Tadesse Senbete, Mattu University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Egwurochi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Berna Krikor Jilenkerian, Syria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (T. Elizabeth Thangamani Sunitha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analyzing the Intentions and Perceptions of University Graduates toward Self-employment through Entrepreneurial Knowledge: A Case of Moshi Cooperative University (MoCU), Tanzania

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

(2) Dr. Pescaru Maria, Pitesti University Center and Politehnica București National University for Science and Technology, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Anil Shriram Gomase, Dr. PDKV, India.

(2) Ayo-Sobowale, Mopelola Omotayo, Lagos State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Buddhini Dankanda, Sri Lanka.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anil Shriram Gomase, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ayo-Sobowale, Mopelola Omotayo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA