Peer Review History: Problems Faced by Undergraduate Students of Assam Agricultural University in Obtaining Scholarships, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ismail Thamarasseri, Mahatma Gandhi University, India.

(2) Rekhraj Sahu, College of Agriculture and Research Station (IGKV), India.

(3) Josephine Diana S. Campos, Bulacan State University, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ismail Thamarasseri, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rekhraj Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Josephine Diana S. Campos, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Leptomeningeal Metastasis: Current Treatment, and Emerging Therapies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ida Bagus Budhi Surya Adnyana, Associate Professor, Dr. Moewardi General Teaching Hospital, Indonesia and Faculty of Medicine, Sebelas Maret University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Rida Aziz, CMH Medical College, Pakistan.

(2) Nibras Saleam Al-Ammar, University of Basrah-College of Medicine, Iraq.

(3) Hoai T.P. Dinh, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rida Aziz, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nibras Saleam Al-Ammar, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hoai T.P. Dinh, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Student Feedback on Lecturer’s Performance at Rwanda Polytechnic’s Kigali College

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Florian Encenarez Manzanilla, Dalubhasaan ng Lungsod ng Lucena (City College of Lucena), Philippines.

(2) Jelena Zascerinska, Centre for Education and Innovation Research, Latvia.

(3) Ana Claudia Tenor, UNIBR College – Botucatu- São Paulo, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Florian Encenarez Manzanilla, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jelena Zascerinska, Latvia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ana Claudia Tenor, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Edible Vaccines as a Novel Approach to Immunization: Recent Advances and Future Potentials

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

(2) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Dhanalakshmi, Padmashree Institute of Management and Sciences, India.

(2) Jonathan Ibrahim, Gombe State College of Health Sciences and Technology, Nigeria.

(3) Mathangi Ganapathy, Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K. Sudhakar, SRR & CVR Government Degree College (A), India.

(2) Mathangi Ganapathy, Anna University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Dhanalakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jonathan Ibrahim, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mathangi Ganapathy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unveiling the Molecular Arsenal: NIK1-Mediated Translation Suppression as a Key Player in Plant Antiviral Immunity

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Jose Luis Abreu, Spenta University Mexico, Mexico.

(2) Talha Riaz, Huazhong Agricultural University, China.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jose Luis Abreu, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Talha Riaz, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Systematic Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): A Perspective from Generic Pharmaceutical Industries

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rafik Karaman, Al-Quds University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Sourav Khawas, Jharkhand Rai University, India.

(2) Kolade Adeyemo, Youngstown State University, United States.

(3) Rakesh Paul, Washington University of Science and Technology (WUST), USA.

(4) Reshma Kodumuru, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ankit Mishra, VNS Group of Institutions, India.

(2) Hesham Sami, Lakshmi Narain College of Pharmacy Bhopal, India.

(3) Miriam Amarachi Mike, University of Notre Dame, USA.

(4) Prasun Chakraborty, India.

(5) Reshma Kodumuru, USA.

(6) Sakshi Uday Waware, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

(7) Sudhaunshu S. Purohit, University of Missouri Kansas City, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sourav Khawas, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kolade Adeyemo, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rakesh Paul, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Reshma Kodumuru, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sub-Acute Pentazocine Induced Toxicity: Biochemical and Histopathological Study of Rat Intestinal Tissues

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Talha Bin Emran, BGC Trust University Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Motireddy Srinivasulu Reddy, Sri Venkateswara University, India.

(2) Claudriana Locatelli, Universidade Alto Vale do Rio do Peixe, Brasil.

(3) Okkes Zortuk, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Yasser Albadrany, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Motireddy Srinivasulu Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Claudriana Locatelli, Brasil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Okkes Zortuk, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exosomal Communication in the Tumour Microenvironment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Implications for Progression and Therapy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lomas Kumar Tomar, Galway University Hospital and National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

Reviewers:

(1) Kirolos Eskandar, Helwan University, Egypt.

(2) Lucia Kiio, Texas Tech University, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kirolos Eskandar, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lucia Kiio, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Neuroprotective and Anticonvulsant Effects of Guava Leaf Extract (Psidium guajava): Implications for Seizure Management and Cognitive Health

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Darsi Eswar Tony, Chalapathi Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(2) Saurabh Dilip Bhandare, Nashik Gramin Shikshan Prasarak Mandal’s college of Pharmacy, University of Pune, India.

(3) Relwendé Justin Ouédraogo, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique (CNRST) and Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), Burkina Faso.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ehab Habeeb Abdulqader, Iraq.

(2) Muyiwa Arisekola, Walter Sisulu University, South Africa.

(3) Precious Ojo Uahomo, School of Science Laboratory Technology, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(4) Relwende Justin Ouedraogo, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique (CNRST), Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Sante (IRSS), Burkina Faso.

(5) Sweta Pundir, I.T.S. College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Darsi Eswar Tony, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saurabh Dilip Bhandare, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Relwendé Justin Ouédraogo, Burkina Faso) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA