Peer Review History: Dietary Supplementation of Poultry for Designer Egg Production: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Villagomez Cortes Jose Alfredo Santiago, University of Veracruz, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Shrihari Ashok Pingle, Sangamner Nagarpalika Arts, D. J. Malpani Commerce and B. N. Sarda Science College (Autonomous), India.

(2) P Radhika, PVNRTVU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sagarika Chakraborty, University of Calcutta, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shrihari Ashok Pingle, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (P Radhika, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of Treated and Untreated Industrial Effluents on Cerebellar Architecture in Wistar Rats: Assessing Neurotoxic Impact and Structural Alterations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gyanesh Kumar Tiwari, Doctor Harisingh Gour Central University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Tanima Debnath Sarkar, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Kishore S.M, KSNUAHS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ghulam Mustafa Channa, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico.

(2) Milena Matuszczak, Neurosurgery Center University Hospital, Collegium Medicum University of Zielona, Poland.

(3) Raju Potharaju, CKM Govt Arts And Science College, India.

(4) Sokoga Victor Ategbe, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Nigeria.

(5) Shamim Akhter, Jammu university, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tanima Debnath Sarkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kishore S.M, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quasi-ultrafilters and Weak-ultrafilters: Their Properties and Maximality

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Palle E. T. Jorgensen, University of Iowa, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Carlos Henrique Tognon, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Brazil.

(2) Beknazarova Saida Safibullayevna, Tashkent University of Information Technologies, Uzbekistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Carlos Henrique Tognon, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Beknazarova Saida Safibullayevna, Uzbekistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Technology for the Development of Functional Greek Yogurt Enriched with Millet and Curcumin and Its Impact on Sensory Attributes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Andrzej Kowalski, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Ankit Kumar Jangid, Government College, Kota, India.

(2) Mirela Anamaria Jimborean, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ankit Kumar Jangid, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mirela Anamaria Jimborean, Romania) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Supplementary Irrigation Water and Organic Matter Amounts on Tomato Yield and Water Productivity in a Semi-arid Climate

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Namita Bisht, William Carey University, India.

(2) Hemareddy Thimmareddy, Keladi Shivappa Nayaka Agricultural And Horticultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mutshekwa Ndivhuho, University of Limpopo, South Africa.

(2) Saeid Shiukhy Soqanloo, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University (SANRU), Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Namita Bisht, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hemareddy Thimmareddy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Influence of Cooperative Financial Literacy, Training and Advisory Strategies on Women’s Financial Empowerment: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Vibhuti Shivam Dube, Babu Banarasi Das University, India.

(2) Budampati. V. S. Sowmya, Sreenidhi Institute of Science and Technology, India.

(3) Mijarul Islam, Barasat College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B. Balanagalakshmi, India.

(2) Evanta Hashem Katha, Bangladesh.

(3) Rajkumar B Nanaware, Yashwantrao Chavan Maharashtra Open University, India.

(4) Roseline Yacim, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

(5) Sharma K R S, Jawaharlal Nehru New College of Engineering – Shivamogga, India.

(6) S.Praveenkumar, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

(7) Rukmini Murugesan, Maharajah Post Graduate College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vibhuti Shivam Dube, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Budampati. V. S. Sowmya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mijarul Islam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Revisiting the Technology Acceptance Models: A Critical Evaluation and Their Educational Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. E.Seda Koç, Namık Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Martin Otundo Richard, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Kenya.

(2) Epilogue Jedishkem, Ngwane College, Eswatini.

(3) Dipak Mahat, Apex Professional University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jumoke I. Oladele, University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

(2) Kyi Kyi Thant, Meiktila University of Economics, Myanmar.

(3) Mala Deep Upadhaya, Birmingham City University, Nepal.

(4) Naheed Saba, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia.

(5) P. Sajida Bhanu, B.S Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science & Technology, India.

(6) S.Porkodi, University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Sultanate of Oman.

(7) Vipin Sharma, Jazan Unievrsity, Saudi Arabia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Martin Otundo Richard, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Epilogue Jedishkem, Eswatini) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dipak Mahat, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Socio-Economic Profile of Innovative Farmers in Telangana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(2) Prof.  Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Ghanshyam Dos, Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti Language University, India.

(2) Angelica Dobre, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aliyu Shuaibu Muhammad, Federal University of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Irshad Hussain, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(3) Murari Behera, IAR – Institute of Advanced Research, University for Innovation, India.

(4) Neha Pandey, Chaudhary Charan Singh PG College Heonra -Etawah , India.

(5) Pallavi Kolekar, Dr. Sharadchandra Pawar College of Agriculture, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ghanshyam Dos, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Angelica Dobre, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment on the Job Competence of Extension Personnel Working in Agricultural Extension Service Systems in Telangana

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt and Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Gomal University, Pakistan.

(3) Prof. Levent SON, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Salisu Audu Baba, College Of Education, Nigeria.

(2) Nora Binti Ibrahim, University Poly-Tech, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Christopher Masinde Indiatsy, School of Business, University of Nairobi, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Salisu Audu Baba, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nora Binti Ibrahim, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Selective Reincorporation of Crop Residues in Soil: Plant Residue Quality Index (PRQI) and Ecological Potential Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Pradeep Kumar, Forest Research Institute, Dehradun, India.

(2) Jacob Pitti, University of Panama, Panama.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Yadesa Bato Ejeta, Ambo University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pradeep Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jacob Pitti, Panama) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA