Peer Review History: Osteogenic Sarcoma of the Vomer Bone : A Rare Case Report and Review of the Literature

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, USA And Associate Professor, Staff Orthopedic Surgeon GV Montgomery Va Medical Center, University of Mississippi Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Saverio Capodiferro, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Italy.

(2) Manish R. Shah, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth, India.

(3) Al Sayed R Al Attar, University of Tripoli, Libya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.34/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saverio Capodiferro, Italy) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manish R. Shah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Al Sayed R Al Attar, Libya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Customer Satisfaction Towards the Farmer Producer Companies’ Products/ Services in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kleopatra Nikolopoulou, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Sam Daniel Fenny A, Agni College of Technology, India.

(2) Ismail Alhassan, Iconic Open University, Nigeria.

(3) Kailash Chandra Dash, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) John Chidume Anetoh, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Nigeria.

(2) Amal Abdulhussain Kuhait, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(3) B.R.Kumar, Andhra Loyola College, India.

(4) Saidu Minin Mohammed, Ahmadu Bello University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sam Daniel Fenny A, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ismail Alhassan, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kailash Chandra Dash, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Study on Business Performance Parameters of Girijan Cooperative Corporation (GCC) in High Altitude and Tribal Zone in Andhra Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Iqtidar Hussain, Gomal University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) G. Veerya Nayak, Kamala Institute of Technology and Science, India.

(2) Hiranmayee Nayak, College of Forestry, OUAT, India.

(3) G. Kiran Kumar Reddy, Rajeev Gandhi Memorial College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ambuja Kumar Tripathy, University of Delhi, India.

(2) Pragalbh Tiwari, College of Forestry (CoF), Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences (SHUATS), India.

(3) Sanjeeta Kumari Devi, Kalinga Institute of Social Sciences (KISS), Deemed to be University, India.

(4) Sourakanti Sarkar, Seacom Skills University, India.

(5) Vanlalrema Kuki, Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar College, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (G. Veerya Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hiranmayee Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (G. Kiran Kumar Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Microbial Contaminants on Medical Devices: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jongwha Chang, Texas Woman’s University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Krutika Dixit, ITM [SLS] Baroda University, India.

(2) Aman Ashar, Karachi Medical and Dental College, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kaushik Sahoo, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Krutika Dixit, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aman Ashar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to Foliar Application of Nitrogen through Nano Urea and Urea Phosphate

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Eman Hamdy Abd El-Azeiz, Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt.

(2) Krishna Urvil Patel, Anand Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Eman Hamdy Abd El-Azeiz, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Krishna Urvil Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Relative Contribution of Different Bees in Aster (Callistephus chinensis L.) Pollination

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Bontha Rajasekar, Horticultural University, India.

(2) Samrat Saha, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Luke Chukwudi Ali, University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bontha Rajasekar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samrat Saha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Canine Babesiosis: Insights into Haematological Disruptions

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Preeya Puangsomlee Wangsomnuk, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Malancus Razvan Nicolae, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” Iasi University of Life Sciences, Romania.

(2) Dipali Parmar, Chaudhary Sarwan Kumar Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K.M. Alsaad, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Oksana Dubova, Polissia National University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Malancus Razvan Nicolae, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dipali Parmar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Acute Toxicity of Mancozeb (fungicide) on Juvenile Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio var. communis)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Wen-Cheng Liu, National United University (NUU), Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Mehmet Reşit Taysı, Bingol University, Türkiye.

(2) M. Ramasamy, Bharathidasan University, India.

(3) Vardhanapu Venkata Lakshmi, Tamil Nadu Dr. J Jayalithaa Fisheries University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Tushar Kanti Roy, Mrinalini Datta Mahavidyapith, India.

(2) Virendra K Sangode, M B Patel College Of Arts Commerce And Science Sadak, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mehmet Reşit Taysı, Bingol University, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (M. Ramasamy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vardhanapu Venkata Lakshmi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Planetary Ionospheres and Ionospheric Instabilities

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Magdy Rabie Soliman Sanad, National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, Egypt.

(2) Prof. Hadia Hassan Selim, National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Belay Sitotaw Goshu, Dire Dawa University, Ethiopia.

(2) Boyko Ranguelov, Space Research and Technology, Bulgaria.

(3) Ali Ibrahem Asad, Latakia University, Syria.

(4) Saidu Sunbo Akanji, Kebbi State Polytechnic Dakingari, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Boyko Ranguelov, Space Research and Technology Institute – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria.

(2) E. U. Iyida, University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(3) Ilgaitis Prūsis, Riga Technical University, Latvia.

(4) Naila Noreen, Forman Christian College (Chartered University), Pakistan.

(5) Rohaniza Binti Mohd Zali, Polytechnics of Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah, Malaysia.

(6) Tahar Bachiri, Abdelmalek Essaidi University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.45/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Belay Sitotaw Goshu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Boyko Ranguelov, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ali Ibrahem Asad, Syria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Saidu Sunbo Akanji, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Irradiation Techniques for Shelf Life Extension of Seafood: An Overview

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Patel Shivangi Bharatbhai, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, India.

(2) Olagbemide Peter Taiwo, Afe Babalola University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akash Deep Shukla, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

(2) Celile Aylin Oluk, Eastern Mediterranean Agriculture Research Institute, Turkey.

(3) Gadhiya Gaurav Ashokkumar, Vellore Institute of Technology, India.

(4) Thi Ngoc Nhon Hoang, Ho Chi Minh City University of Food Industry, Vietnam.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Patel Shivangi Bharatbhai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Olagbemide Peter Taiwo, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA