Peer Review History: Impact of Nano-Urea, Potassium Silicate and Micronutrients on Soil Nutrient Dynamics, Productivity and Profitability of Paddy

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed ELBAGHDADI, University Sultan Moulay Slimane, Morocoo.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Elsayed Ahmed Maaty, Egypt.

(2) Raymond Jockey , Federal college of Horticulture Dadinkowa , Nigeria .

(3) Reda E. Essa, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nihad Abdul-Lateef Ali Kadhim, AL -Qasim Green University, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed Elsayed Ahmed Maaty, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raymond Jockey, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Reda E. Essa, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparative Study of Nurses’ Turnover Rate Working in Urban and Rural Areas

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Barkha Devi, Sikkim Manipal college of Nursing, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmad Fathulla Ahmad, Erbil Polytechnic University – Erbil College of Technical Management, Iraq.

(2) Sandhya Shelar, Savitribai Phule Pune University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arifa Khadim, University of Sahiwal, Pakistan.

(2) Bahaaeldin A.H. Tabeel, Palestinian Ministry of Health, Palestine.

(3) Idris Yusuf Isah, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria, Nigeria.

(4) Namrata Gain, Rungta International Skills University, India.

(5) Rani Jaiswal, Jamia Hamdard University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmad Fathulla Ahmad, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sandhya Shelar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Trace Metal Accumulation in Compost Produced from Water Hyacinth Biomass in Southern Togo

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Aileen D. Tacbalan, Eastern Visayas State University , Philippines.

(2) Abdullahi Isiaka Hassan, Kaduna State University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aileen D. Tacbalan, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdullahi Isiaka Hassan, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Dietary Influence of Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa L.) Calyx Extract on Oxidative Stability and Microbiological Quality of Cooked Chicken

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Osama Anwer Saeed, University of Anbar, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Celile Aylin Oluk, Eastern Mediterranean Agriculture Research Institute, Turkiye.

(2) Santosh Sajjan, Veterinary College, KVAFSU, India.

(3) Kiran Moyee Handique, College of Veterinary Science, India .

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chandrasekhar Bhoi, B.J.B. Autonomous College, India.

(2) Naima Sahraoui, Blida 1 university, Algeria.

(3) Ria Harmayani, Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram University, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Celile Aylin Oluk, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Santosh Sajjan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kiran Moyee Handique, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Preference and Importance of Goat Breeds in Households in the Diffa Region, Niger

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Daniel Kiros Woldegebriel, Mekelle University, Ethiopia.

(2) Abdullah Hameed Salim, University of Thi-Qar, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Felix Danso, Guangdong Ocean University, China.

(2) Narayan G. Hegde, BAIF Development Research Foundation, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Daniel Kiros Woldegebriel, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdullah Hameed Salim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Poetic Analysis of Modern Poetry

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Suleyman Goksoy, University of Duzce, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) R. Sowmiya, University of Madras, India.

(2) Anestis Karastergiou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.

(3) T. Mahendran, KSR College of Education, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Joel Bulus Daniel, Kaduna State University, Nigeria.

(2) Milica Denkovsk, MIT University Skopje, North Macedonia.

(3) Nisha Gurjar, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R. Sowmiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anestis Karastergiou, Greece) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (T. Mahendran, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of the Flipped Classroom on Academic Achievement and Interest in Senior Secondary School Chemistry in Minna Metropolis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Saidu Bangura , Sierra Leone Muslim Congress Senior Secondary School, Sierra Leone.

(2) Logaswari Subramaniam, International Languages Teacher Training Institute, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) KOTTIN Assogba Evariste, University of Abomey-Calavi, Benin.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saidu Bangura, Sierra Leone) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Logaswari Subramaniam, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Design of an IoT based smart microclimate monitoring and controlling system for naturally ventilated polyhouse cultivation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Muscettola, Banco BPM, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Maharshi Rahevar, Shree Swaminarayan Arts and Commerce College , India.

(2) Subedar Singh, Mandsaur University, India.

(3) Dinanath Bhandari, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.73/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maharshi Rahevar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Subedar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dinanath Bhandari, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Intercropping and Plant Geometry of Maize (Zea mays L.) Intercropped with Mungbean (Vigna radiate L.) on Growth and Yield Characters

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Mohamed Ezzat Abd El-Salam, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Agustinus N Kairupan, Indonesia.

(2) Pradeep Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(3) Luidi Eric Guimarães Antunes, State University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mukesh Chand Goyal, Agriculture University Kota, India.

(2) Shahrzad Khatibi, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Agustinus N Kairupan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pradeep Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Luidi Eric Guimarães Antunes, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Trend Analysis of Solid Waste Management in India: A Performance-Based Evaluation Using Growth Indicators

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Govinda Raj Upadhyay, Aishwarya Multiple Campus, Kailali affiliated to Tribhuvan University Nepal, Nepal.

(2) Aadil Akbar Wani, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bireswar Pradhan, India.

(2) Mohammad Rafiq Khan, SKUAST-Kashmir, India.

(3) Muhammad Ahsan Iqbal, Rawalpindi Women University, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Govinda Raj Upadhyay, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aadil Akbar Wani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA