Peer Review History: Contemporary Trends and Novelties in Biotechnology: From Programmable Biology to Scalable Translation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jean-Paul Ngbolua Koto-Te-Nyiwa, University of Kinshasa, Congo DR.

Reviewers:

(1) Sudipta Saha, Sister Nivedita University, India.

(2) Almoatazbellah Ali El-Mouhamady Hassan, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(3) Esma Khoja, Uskudar University, Turkey.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jeenal Gupta, Madhya Pradesh Medical Science University, India.

(2) Sarmishtha Chatterjee, Belur Sramajibi Swasthya Prakalpa Samity, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sudipta Saha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Almoatazbellah Ali El-Mouhamady Hassan, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Esma Khoja, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Guava Productivity and Profitability in Adilabad, Northern Telangana through Front Line Demonstrations on Integrated Crop Management

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Mohamed Ezzat Abd El-Salam, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Uttara Singh, CMP Degree College University of Allahabad, India .

(2) Mukesh Nitharwal, Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sumanta Kumar Basak, Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Uttara Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mukesh Nitharwal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Fodder Pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.) to Zinc and Iron Application

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ahmed Mohamed Ezzat Abd El-Salam, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Rama Shankar, India.

(2) Tanu Oinam, Central Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rama Shankar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tanu Oinam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of Organic Materials for Improving Growth and Yield of Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) in Acid Soil of Nagaland

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nesreen Houssien Ahmed Abou-Baker, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Jyoti Pandey, India.

(2) Abdul Kadir Salam, University of Lampung, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anastasia Bashkireva, Ryazan State University named after S.A. Yesenin, Russia.

(2) George H Muchineripi, Zimbabwe.

(3) Abdullahi, Khadijat kubura, Federal University of Technology Minna, Nigeria.

(4) Grandhi Suresh Kumar, ICFAI Foundation For higher education, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jyoti Pandey, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdul Kadir Salam, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Micro-Computed Tomography as a Tool for Assessing Bone Loss Related to Experimental Periodontal Disease: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. ZoranTodorovic, University of Belgrade And University Medical Center “Bezanijskakosa” Serbia.

(2) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Navdeep Johar, UK.

(2) Nabin Kumar Chaudhary, Nepalgunj Medical College, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Asmita sethi, KGMU, India.

(2) Boris Egic, Slovenija.

(3) Eenal Bhambri, Surendera Dental College & Research Institute, India.

(4) Jay Devraj Kansara, Prefer Not To Say, Republic of India.

(5) Santoshi Ram Ghodake, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Dental College and Hospital, India.

(6) Suchetha A, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

(7) Zouaoui, Algeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Navdeep Johar, UK) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nabin Kumar Chaudhary, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | JOURNAL CHANGE | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Houseflies as Reservoirs of Microbial and Parasitic Pathogens in Open Waste Dump Sites

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lidija Kozacinski, Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Waqar , Walailak University, Thailand.

(2) Sunday Stephen Abi, United Kingdom.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.Rashid, SKUAST- Jammu, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

 Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Waqar , Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sunday Stephen Abi, United Kingdom) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Perception of Secondary-level Prospective Teachers toward MOOCs: A Comparative Study by Gender and Academic Stream

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shao-I Chiu, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan.

(2) Dr. Luis Alberto Camputaro, Institute “Hospital El Salvador” El Salvador, Central America.

Reviewers:

(1) Sohaib Ullah, Southwest University, China.

(2) Olubukola Christiana Dada, Kwara State University, Nigeria.

(3) Jonah O. Gonzalo, National Aviation Academy Of The Philippines, Philippines.

(4) Marian Ileana, National University Of Science And Technology Politehnica Bucharest, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akoijam Pete Meitei, Ibotombi Institute of Education (IIE), India.

(2) Enock Panganayi Mawuye, University of Rwanda, Rwanda.

(3) Habibat Lawal, School of Secondary Education (Technical), Federal College of Education (Tech ) Bichi, Nigeria.

(4) Hairul Azman Bin Mohd Hata, Malaysia.

(5) Indrya Mulyaningsih, Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia.

(6) Mirela Macelaru, Medical school Osijek, Croatia.

(7) Pardeep Rattan, Smhs Government College, India

(8) Sangram Ashok Killedar, Shivaji University Kolhapur, India.

(9) Zainab Abubakar, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sohaib Ullah, China) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Olubukola Christiana Dada, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jonah O. Gonzalo, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Marian Ileana, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Solar Energy Interventions on Energy Efficiency Behaviour and Conservation Practices in Nigeria’s Federal Capital Territory: A Survey-based Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hasan AYDOGAN, Selcuk University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Agustina Dian Putri Manurung, Satu Padu Boarding School, Indonesia.

(2) Abdulghafor Mohammed Hashim, Salahaddin University / Bayan University Erbil, Iraq.

(3) Navid Nasiri, Sultan Qaboos University, Oman.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) K.Sindhura, MEASI Institute of Management, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Agustina Dian Putri Manurung, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdulghafor Mohammed Hashim, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Navid Nasiri, Oman) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Biowaste for Bioenergy and Adoption Strategies in the Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aleksey Khlopytskyi, Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Dr. Surat Sheikh, Kazi Nazrul University, India.

(2) Rodolfo Antonio Hernandez Chaverri, Universidad Estatal a Distancia, Costa Rica.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdelgader Agilah Saleh Gheidan, Bright Star University, Libya.

(2) B.Kailashkumar, Paavai Engineering College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dr. Surat Sheikh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rodolfo Antonio Hernandez Chaverri, Costa Rica) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Spectral Properties and Energy Analysis of the Bishop Hypergraph on the 8×8 Chessboard

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Sandeep Sharma, A&M Institute of Management and Technology, India.

(2) Rizal Irfandi, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia.

(3) Muthuselvan. K, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, India.

(4) Nitiraj V. Kulkarni, Vishwakarma University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Elymar A. Pascual, Philippines.

(2) M.Raji, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, India.

(3) Phillip Adoka Christopher Okisai, FMJHS, Ghana.

(4) Soobia Saeed, Malaysia.

(5) V.Jayapriya, Idhaya College for Women, India.

(6) Vinay Saxena, Kisan Post Graduate College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sandeep Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rizal Irfandi, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Muthuselvan. K, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Nitiraj V. Kulkarni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA