Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) Marija Bajagić, University Bijeljina, Bosnia and Herzegovina.

(2) Rajkishore Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Marija Bajagić, Bosnia and Herzegovina) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajkishore Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Emmanouil Magiorkinis, Metaxas Memorial Anticancer Hospital, Greece.

Reviewers:

(1) Kiryowa Idrisa, Russia.

(2) K. Manohar Babu, India.

(3) Heenu Sharma, Rayat Bahra University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kiryowa Idrisa, Russia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (K. Manohar Babu, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Heenu Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Shaharior Rahman Razu, Khulna University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Aryan Malik, University of Delhi, India.

(2) Swati Kumari, Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aryan Malik, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Swati Kumari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Masafumi Tateda, Toyama Prefectural University, Japan.

(2) Prof.  Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Agrarian University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) Foufou Ammar, University 20 August 1955 -Skikda, Algeria.

(2) Nagendra Tripathi, Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University, C.G. Bhilai Institute of Technology,Durg . C.G, India.

(3) Era Lamba, CCS HAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Foufou Ammar, Algeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nagendra Tripathi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Era Lamba, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v3 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v4_and_Feedback_v4 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v4 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v5_and_Feedback_v5 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wolfgang Linert(Retd.), Vienna University of Technology, Europe

Reviewers:

(1) Joseph Omeiza Alao, Air Force Institute of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Ngai Nfor Jude, University of Buea and Ministry Of Scientific Research And Innovation, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Joseph Omeiza Alao, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ngai Nfor Jude, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) P. Satheesh Kumar, G.T.N. Arts College (Autonomous), India.

(2) Ali Aboudi Nehme, Imam Al-Kadhum University College (IKC), Iraq.

(3) Kasturi R. Naik, Pearl Academy, Mumbai, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aishee Aich, Vivekananda College for Women, India.

(2) K.Usha Kumari, Dr.YSR Horticultural University, India.

(3) Suman Kumar, T.N.B College, TMBU, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (P. Satheesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Aboudi Nehme, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kasturi R. Naik, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine

Reviewers:

(1) Aileen D. Tacbalan, Philippines.

(2) Ankit Pandey, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya , India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jagdish Choudhary, School of Agricultural Sciences, Nagaland University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aileen D. Tacbalan, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ankit Pandey, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Tras-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Abdulhalim Musa Abubakar, Modibbo Adama University, Nigeria.

(2) Imants Plume, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Latvia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Srinivas Kasulla, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abdulhalim Musa Abubakar, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Imants Plume, Latvia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan

Reviewers:

(1) Divya Kanojiya, Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Syed Khalid Mustafa, University of Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.

(3) Adeleye A. Edema, The University of Tulsa, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Divya Kanojiya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Syed Khalid Mustafa, Arabia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Adeleye A. Edema, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Intan Kurnianingrum, Binuang Agricultural Training Center, Indonesia.

(2) Eswari beeram, Mohan Babu University, India.

(3) Pulipati Sowjanya, Vignan Pharmacy College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pragati S. Abhyankar, Haribhai V.Desai College of Arts,Science and Commerce, India.

(2) Vijaya Gupta, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya central university, Bilaspur, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.56/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Intan Kurnianingrum, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eswari beeram, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Pulipati Sowjanya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA