Peer Review History: 2D-Qsar Modeling of the Anti-Malarial Activity Prediction of 4-Quinolinylhydrazone Derivatives on Strain K1

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farzaneh Mohamadpour, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Sumita Kumari, Puran Murti College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) C. Ramakrishna, PES University, India.

(3) Apt. Mahfur, Pekalongan University, Pekalongan.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sumita Kumari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (C. Ramakrishna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Apt. Mahfur, Pekalongan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Crucial Role of Mutant and Immunodeficient Mouse Strains Selection in Biomedical Research: A Mini-review of Main Strains

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. K.V. Ramanath, Rajeev College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Dr. Anup Subhash Hendre, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) S Anu Kiruthika, Indian Academy Degree College Autonomous, India.

(2) Sabina Khatun, NIMS Institute of Pharmacy, India.

(3) T. Purushoth Prabhu, The Tamilnadu Dr MGR Medical University, C L Baid Metha College of Pharmacy, India.

(4) Fezzeh Hosseinzadeh, Tabriz University of Medical Science Tabriz, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S Anu Kiruthika, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sabina Khatun, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (T. Purushoth Prabhu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Fezzeh Hosseinzadeh, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Characteristics of Ureteral Trauma Following Gynaecological Procedures

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Veera Muthumari, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Prakash Chhettri, Pokhara Academy of Health Sciences, Nepal.

(2) Ahmed Mahmood Hussein, University of Kirkuk – College of Medicine, Iraq.

(3) Babatope Lanre Awosusi, King Khalid Hospital Al Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.77/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prakash Chhettri, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed Mahmood Hussein, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Babatope Lanre Awosusi, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: AWARENESS AND FARMERS’ PERCEPTION TOWARDS ORGANIC FERTILIZERS IN KUTCH DISTRICT OF GUJARAT

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Ender Durualp, Ankara University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Simpa, Ondeku James, Federal Polytechnic, Nigeria.

(2) FE T. Canoy, Southern Philippines Agri-Business and Marine and Aquatic School of Technology, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Simpa, Ondeku James, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (FE T. Canoy, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Re-circulatory Aquaculture Systems: A Pathway to Sustainable Fish Farming

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Kazutoshi Okuno, Former Professor, University of Tsukuba, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ernesto A. Chavez, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, México.

(2) Chioma G. Achionye-Nzeh, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.

(3) Eleanor Daniella Binti Lokman, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ernesto A. Chavez, México) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chioma G. Achionye-Nzeh, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Eleanor Daniella Binti Lokman, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Stocking Density on the Growth Performances of Caged Broilers During Summer Season

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

(2) Dr. Iram Liaqat, Govt. College University, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ekuma, Emmanuel Toochukwu, Nigeria.

(2) Sudhanya Nath, India.

(3) Gabriella Chimuanya Iheanacho, Clemson University, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.84/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ekuma, Emmanuel Toochukwu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sudhanya Nath, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gabriella Chimuanya Iheanacho, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Nutrients Composition of Some Red Vegetables from Fruit Garden Market in Port Harcourt

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Muhammad Abdul Rehman Rashid, Assistant Professor, Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ifreke Mfon Udofia, University of Uyo, Nigeria.

(2) Snehal P. Khandekar, DY Patil Agriculture & Technical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ifreke Mfon Udofia, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Snehal P. Khandekar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: How Green HRM Practices Effect Organizational Citizenship Behaviour in the Indian Service Sector: The Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alexandru Trifu, University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Khin Marlar Maung, Meiktila University of Economics, Myanmar.

(2) Vuk Mirčetić, University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Serbia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khin Marlar Maung, Myanmar) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vuk Mirčetić, Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Emotional Intelligence to the Decision- making of School Heads as Mediated by Technology Leadership

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gustavo Henrique Silva de Souza, Federal Institute of The North of Minas Gerais [Instituto Federal do Norte de Minas Gerais – IFNMG], Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Hamed Ghaemi, Bahar Institute of Higher Education, Iran.

(2) Anton Pretorius, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.4/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hamed Ghaemi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anton Pretorius, South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Organic Matter Amendment on Aggregate Stability of Some Agricultural Soils in Semi Arid Region of Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nhamo Nhamo, Marondera University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Marondera.

Reviewers:

(1) Kavita Solanki, Govt. Madhav Science College, Madhya Pradesh, India.

(2) Reda E. Essa, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(3) Ogunoye, Olalekan Ajibolade, Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.17/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kavita Solanki, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Reda E. Essa, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ogunoye, Olalekan Ajibolade, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA