Peer Review History: A Review on Diversity and Applications of Traditional and Modern Millet and Cereal- based Probiotic Beverages

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Tatjana Radosavljević, University of Belgrade, Republic of Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Priyanka Sharma, Career Point University, India.

(2) Deshpande H.W., VNMKV, India.

(3) Bianca de Oliveira Hosken, Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) B.Prakash, Vels University, India.

(2) Patrisio Njiru Njeru, Fleming Technical Institute, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.67/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Priyanka Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deshpande H.W., India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bianca de Oliveira Hosken, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Influence of Micronutrients and Plant Growth Regulators on Growth and Seed Yield of Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanja Predrag Zivkovic, University of Nis, Serbia.

(2) Sanaa A. H. Al-Dulaimi, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(3) Bidai Yasmina, University of Oran1, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khairil Mahmud, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Lobna salah Taha, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanja Predrag Zivkovic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanaa A. H. Al-Dulaimi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bidai Yasmina, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Adsorption of Copper (II), Cobalt (II) and Nickel (II) on Minim-Martap Bauxite, Cameroon: A Kinetic and Equilibrium based Study Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Angélica Machi Lazarin, State University of Maringá,  Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Zobeidi Ammar, University of El-Oued, Algeria.

(2) Hagar Fathy Saad Abdelatif Mohamed Forsan, Agricultural Research Centre, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bienvenu Cherubala, Vaal University of Technology, South Africa.

(2) Walid REZIG, University of Sciences and the Technology of Oran Mohamed Boudiaf, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zobeidi Ammar, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hagar Fathy Saad Abdelatif Mohamed Forsan, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Psychological Capital and Teacher Autonomy as Predictors of Pedagogical Competence among Public Elementary School Teachers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alexandru Trifu, University of Iasi, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Geleta Dugasa Erena, Wollega University, Ethiopia.

(2) Philip Moore, Lanzhou University, United Kingdom.

(3) Adalikwu Mfon-Ette Theresa, FCT College of Education, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) R N Mishra, Mizoram University, India.

(2) Rumbidzayi Masina, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Geleta Dugasa Erena, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Philip Moore, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Adalikwu Mfon-Ette Theresa, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 (Philip Moore, United Kingdom) NO RESPONSE | NA | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Commercial Fish Feed Usage and Market Access Among Fish Farmers in Manipur, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Umi Wahidah Ahmad Dini, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Mark Eka Ali, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P. Subavathy, St. Mary’s College (Autonomous), India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.85/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Umi Wahidah Ahmad Dini, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mark Eka Ali, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Difficulties in Internet Adaptation for Students in Developing Countries: A Machine Learning Approach to Network Visualization and Cluster Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Jacob Tito Ngwenya, Zimbabwe Open University, Zimbabwe.

(2) S. Sivankalai, Anna University Chennai, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jacob Tito Ngwenya, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Sivankalai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Treatment of Effluent Water from Futo Hostel Using Carica papaya (Pawpaw) Seeds as Coagulant

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  David Armando Contreras-Solorio, Autonomous University of Zacatecas, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Aremanda Ramesh Babu, Mainefhi College of Engineering and Technology (MCET), Eritrea.

(2) Mona M. Amin Abdel-Fatah, National Research Centre (NRC), Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Julius Nnamdi Ndive, Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu University, Nigeria.

(2) Rizal Irfandi, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aremanda Ramesh Babu, Eritrea) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mona M. Amin Abdel-Fatah, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v4_and_Feedback_v4 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimization and Comparative Assessment of Xylitol Production by Candida tropicalis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim,Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Norhamiza Binti Mohamad Sukri, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, Malaysia.

(2) Madhu Gudipati, Gate College of Pharmacy, India.

(3) Ofoedum Arinze Francis, Federal University of Technology Owerri, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daniel Montalvo Salinas, Instituto Tecnologico de Orizaba, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Norhamiza Binti Mohamad Sukri, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Madhu Gudipati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ofoedum Arinze Francis, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Hepatic Effects of Unripe Carica papaya (Pawpaw) Sap in Adult Male Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Xuzhou Normal University, China.

(2) Prof. Aurora Martínez Romero, Juarez University,  Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Anamika, Shree Dev Bhoomi Inst of Eduction Science & Technology, India.

(2) Enoghase Raymond Joseph, College of Medical Sciences, University of Benin, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdullah Abdulslam Abdullah Mohammed, University of Gadarif, Sudan.

(2) Amna Jawaid, NSW Health, Australia.

(3) Bahadır kılınc, Veterinary Control Central Research Institute Ankara, Turkiye.

(4) Dilip Kr. Goswami, I . A . Ayurvedic Medical College, University of Science and Technology Meghalaya, India.

(5) Lusi Agus Setiani, M. Farm, Pakuan University, Indonesia.

(6) Roopa K .V, Sri Sri College of Ayurvedic Science And Research, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anamika, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Enoghase Raymond Joseph, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | JOURNAL CHANGE TO AJARR FROM JAMMR | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: AI in Higher Education: Effect on Student Competency and Independent Learning

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. E.Seda Koç, Namık Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Krupa Milind Dharmadhikari, Bharati Vidyapeeth, Institute of Management and Entrepreneurship Development, India.

(2) Najm A. Kh. Alhatimi Aleessawi, Arab Universities, Jordan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) C. Priya, School of Engineering and Technology, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan University, India.

(2) Munnu Prasad V, School of Allied Healthcare and Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Krupa Milind Dharmadhikari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Najm A. Kh. Alhatimi Aleessawi, Jordan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA