Peer Review History: Assessment of Enablers and Barriers to Childhood Immunisation in Gassol Local Government Area of Taraba State, Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hamdy A. Sliem, Internal Medicine, Suez Canal University, Egypt and College of Dentistry, Qassim University and EL-Jouf University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Samuel Kemboi, Mount Kenya University, Kenya.

(2) Nure Ishrat Nazme, Combined Military Hospital, Bangladesh.

(3) Aron Rezene Mebrahtu, University of Zambia, Zambia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Samuel Kemboi, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nure Ishrat Nazme, Bangladesh) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aron Rezene Mebrahtu, Zambia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Identity Management in Global Compliance: Innovative Implementation Strategies in Cybersecurity Landscape

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Associate Professor, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) S.Lara Priyadharshini, PSGR Krishnammal College For Women, India.

(2) Ahmed Olabisi Olajide, University of Bradford, United Kingdom.

(3) Gaurav Shekhar, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S.Lara Priyadharshini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmed Olabisi Olajide, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Gaurav Shekhar, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Nanocomposite on Penetration and Development of Meloidogyne incognita on Okra

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON, School of Silifke, Mersin University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhavesh M. Joshi, S. D. Agricultural University, India.

(2) Loukrakpam Bina Chanu, Manipur University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhavesh M. Joshi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Loukrakpam Bina Chanu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity of Leucaena leucocephala Leaves Collected in Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Kosasih, Universitas Pancasila, Indonesia.

(2) Sheeba Menon, K K Shah Jarodwala Maninagar Science College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kosasih, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sheeba Menon, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Chitosan Nanoparticles as Biocompatible Tool in Agriculture

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ayona Jayadev, Assistant Professor, Research Center and Post Graduate, All Saints’ College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Zoyeb Mohamed Zia, The New College, India.

(2) Okon Okokon Ekpenyong, University of Calabar, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Zoyeb Mohamed Zia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Okon Okokon Ekpenyong, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Quality of Chinese Agricultural Products Exported to Japan 2001-2017: Econometric Descriptive Nested Logit Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Gerald Aranoff, Ariel University, Israel.

(2) Prof. Turgut Tursoy, Near East University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Okabile Ransom Wodu, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poland.

(2) Araz Waleed Hussein, Firat University, Turkiye.

(3) Feyisayo Michael Ogunyemi, Eastern Illinois University, United State of America.

(4) Pronab Jyoti Powrel, Anand Agricultural University, India.

(5) Chems Eddine Boukhedimi, University of Tizi-Ouzou, Algeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Okabile Ransom Wodu, Poland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Araz Waleed Hussein, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Feyisayo Michael Ogunyemi, United State of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Pronab Jyoti Powrel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Chems Eddine Boukhedimi, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Reform of College English Teaching Model: Embracing Mobile-Assisted Collaborative Language Learning

Editor(s):

(1 Dr.  Hiroko Kanoh, Associate Professor, Institute of Arts and Sciences,  National University Corporation, Yamagata University, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Venkata Ramana Manipatruni, Sri Vasavi Engineering College, India.

(2) Angela Bayu Pertama Sari, Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Venkata Ramana Manipatruni, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Angela Bayu Pertama Sari, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Screening of Advanced Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes against Pod Borers

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dalong Guo, College of Horticulture and Plant Protection, Henan University of Science and Technology, China.

Reviewers:

(1) A.Nithish, SKLTGHU, India.

(2) Shradha Parmar, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, India.

(3) Amine Assouguem, Moulay Ismaïl University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A.Nithish, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shradha Parmar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amine Assouguem, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Critical Examination of Potentials and Pitfalls of Genetically Modified Foods

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Leslaw Juszczak, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Jithin Scaria, Nilgiri College of Arts and Science, India.

(2) Karthick R, K.L.N. College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jithin Scaria, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Karthick R, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v3_and_Feedback_v3 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v3 | File 1 | NA

Peer Review History: Saba senegalensis (A.DC) Pichon (Apocynaceae): Treatment of Loperamide-induced Constipation in Mice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Paola Angelini, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Roshan Kumar Dubey, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Khulood Ayad Majeed, University of Kirkuk, Iraq.

(3) Bargale Sushant Sukumar, S D M college of Ayurveda and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Roshan Kumar Dubey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khulood Ayad Majeed, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Bargale Sushant Sukumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA