Peer Review History: Green Human Resource Management and Environmental Sustainability: A Bibliometric Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Pravata Kumar Jena, D.K.N College, India.

(2) Samuel Bangura, Mangosutho University of Technology, Republic of South Africa.

(3) Savita Punjabi, Bharat College of Arts and Commerce, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pravata Kumar Jena, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samuel Bangura, Republic of South Africa) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Savita Punjabi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Prevalence of Schistosomiasis among Primary Schools Pupils at Gala Village in Sumaila Local Government Area, Kano State

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sirigireddy Sivajothi, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Imrana Muhammad Arzika, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, Nigeria.

(2) Hamit Mahamat Mahamat Alio, University of N’Djamena and La Renaissance , Chad.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abubakar Babangida Usman, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Imrana Muhammad Arzika, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hamit Mahamat Mahamat Alio, Chad) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: An Overview of Application of Internet of Things (IoT) in Various Fields: Emerging Challenges and Prospects

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Varun Varma Sangaraju, Computer Science and Information technology, USA.

(2) Almash Saifi, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amrita Bid More, Medicaps University, India.

(1) Chander Diwaker, Kurukshetra University, India.

(3) Hassan Youssef, ALASALA Collages , DMMAM, KSA.

(4) Mahabub Sultan, Buffalo State University, United States.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Varun Varma Sangaraju, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Almash Saifi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Harnessing Hydromagnetic Tangent Hyperbolic Hybrid Nanofluids for Enhanced Heat Transfer and Energy Efficiency in Concentrated Solar Power Systems

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aleksey Khlopytskyi, Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Emin Taner ELMAS, Igdir University, Turkey.

(2) Perepi Rajarajeswari, Vellore Instittue of Technology, India.

(3) Rizwan Ahmad Khan, Govt Nehru P G College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ansam Adil Mohammed, Al- Nahrain University, Iraq.

(2) Gemedo Mohammed Bona, Hawassa University, Ethiopia.

(3) Sharun Mendonca, St Joseph Engineering College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9.5/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emin Taner ELMAS, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Perepi Rajarajeswari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rizwan Ahmad Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Seedlings Conservation Methods on Physiological Recovery and Tuber Yield of Solenostemon rotundifolius [(Poir.) J.K. Morton]

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem Ali Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Neeraj Nath Parihar, Sardar Patel University, India.

(2) Anthony Antwi-Wiredu, CSIR-Forestry Research Institute of Ghana, Ghana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ujjal Kumar Pati, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neeraj Nath Parihar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anthony Antwi-Wiredu, Ghana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring Constraints to Communication Skill Development: A Multidimensional Study in Higher Agricultural Education

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Lixiang Cao, Sun Yat-sen University, P. R. China.

Reviewers:

(1) S Archana, Anurag University, India.

(2) Maxwell Uduafemhe, United States of America.

(3) S Sriranjani Mokshagundam, BGS B-School, Bangalore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bondarieva Iryna, National University of Pharmacy, Ukraine.

(2) Hadeel Kamil Khaleel, Al-Iraqia University, Iraq.

(3) Julia Koifman, Kinneret Academic College, Israel.

(4) Victoria C. Magayon, Cainta Senior High School, Philippines.

(5) Mohd Faishal, St. Joseph’s College (Autonomous), India.

(6) Rohit Kumar Pal, ADAMAS University, India.

(7) Santanu Patra, Netaji Subhas Open University, India.

(8) Shakila T. Shamsu, IGNOU (substantive post), India.

(9) Sikirulahi A. Gazali, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S Archana, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maxwell Uduafemhe, United States of America) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S Sriranjani Mokshagundam, India) | File 1 | NA 


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Journal Change | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Artificial Intelligence-Driven Drug Discovery: Transforming the Pharmaceutical Pipeline from Target Identification to Clinical Translation

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi, Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sahana VM Vats, National College of Ayurveda and Hospital, India.

(2) Vijay Aadhithya C, Sethu Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Krupalkumar Morker, United States.

(2) Sachin S. Chourasia, Rashtrasant Tukadoji Maharaj Nagpur University, India.

(2) Sunil kumar, National College of Ayurveda and Hospital, India.

(3) Zafar Mehmood, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sahana VM Vats , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vijay Aadhithya C, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Serum C-Reactive Protein and Admission Hyperglycemia as Predictors of Stroke Severity and Early Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Observational Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Avijit Saha., Malda Medical College & Hospital, India.

(2) Humayun Rashid, East West Medical College Hospital, Bangladesh.

(3) Mohammed Aslam, H N B Medical Education University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ashish Sharma, AIIMS Bilaspur(HP), India.

(2) Abbas Taher, Iraq.

(3) Niraj Kumar, Shri Guru Ram Rai University, India.

(4) Putra Agina Widyaswara Suwaryo, Universitas Muhammadiyah Gombong, Indonesia.

(5) Surya Teja Nakka, Rajeev Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Avijit Saha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Humayun Rashid, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohammed Aslam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Evaluation of Selected Medicinal Plant Extracts against Multidrug Resistant Pseudomonas fluorescens: Evidence for Phytotherapeutic Potential in Kalahandi District, Odisha, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pankaj Kumar, Dolphin (PG) Institute of Biomedical and Natural Sciences, India.

(2) Dr. Simone Aquino, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Dickson Aboagye, The University of Toledo, United States of America (USA).

(2) Onuche Samuel Ugbedeojo, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

(3) Seema J Patel, Davangere University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Buleni Milton, Uganda.

(2) Jeyalakshmi Thanuja K, Jain Deemed to be University, India.

(3) Jose Rafael Ojeda Bracho, National Experimental University “Francisco de Miranda”, Venezuela.

(4) Suneeta Panicker, Dr. D.Y. Patil ACS College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dickson Aboagye, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Onuche Samuel Ugbedeojo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Seema J Patel, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Correlation between Methylene Blue Reduction Test and Standard Plate Count of Raw and Pasteurized Milk

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Khalfa Ali, University of Ain Temouchent, Algeria.

Reviewers:

(1) Maria Radoslavova Pavlova, National Center of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, Bulgaria.

(2) Shiwa Chaubey, CSIR–National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI), India.

(3) Mary Mubiana, Chalimbana University, Zambia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chand Ram, ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maria Radoslavova Pavlova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shiwa Chaubey, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mary Mubiana, Zambia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA