Peer Review History: Double Cystic Artery Arising from the Right Hepatic Artery During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, And University of Mississippi Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Aung Chan Thar, Myanmar.

(2) Usha K. Dandekar, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aung Chan Thar, Myanmar) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Usha K. Dandekar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Glutathione: A Tripeptide with Functions Beyond Antioxidant Activity

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Gul Ozcan, University of Istanbul, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) HENRY WICAKSONO, AIRLANGGA UNIVERSITY, INDONESIA.

(2) Chanda Ranjan, The Oxford College of Pharmacy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sana Qausain, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

(2) H Aparna Latha, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.

(3) Muhammad Zakria Rehman, Institute of Animal And Dairy sciences , University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (HENRY WICAKSONO, INDONESIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chanda Ranjan, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Branch Pruning on Earliness and Fruit Quality in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Ioana Grozea, King Michael I of Romania” in University of Life Sciences Timisoara, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Gulab Omari, Nangarhar University, Afghanistan.

(2) Shubham Shankar Bhosale, Shreeram College of Horticulture, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Inka Dahlianah, Sjakhyakirti University, Indonesia.

(2) Lompo Ounyambila, University of Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Burkina Faso.

(3) Radoslaw J. Walkowiak, Poland.

(4) S.K. Purbey, ICAR-MGIFRI, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mohammad Gulab Omari, Afghanistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shubham Shankar Bhosale, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of Agricultural Credit on the Employability of Rice Farmers in a Context of Ecological Change: A Causal Analysis in the Logone Valley, Chad

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sailendra Narayan Goswami, Government of Assam,India.

Reviewers:

(1) Harshad Laxman Jadhav, Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil College, India.

(2) Daniel Omondi Ochanda, Strathmore University, Kenya.

(3) Rameshwar Rai, Madan Bhandari University of Science and Technology (MBUST), Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Zugravu Gheorghe Adrian, University “Dunarea de Jos” of Galati, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Harshad Laxman Jadhav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Daniel Omondi Ochanda, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rameshwar Rai, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Study on The Effect of Pretreatments on Quality of BANANA (Musa paradisiaca L.) Chips and Its Storage Stability

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Sameh Awad, Alexandria University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Prasanthi Cheekurumelli, St. Ann’s College for Women , India.

(2) R Vijaya Vahini , University of madras, , India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prasanthi Cheekurumelli, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R Vijaya Vahini, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comparative Analysis of Socio-Economic Empowerment among Tribal Women SHG Members and Non-Members in Gujarat, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Marco Muscettola, Banco BPM, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) VICTOR OCHIENG OTIENO, KISII UNIVERSITY, KENYA.

(2) Kavita Sangolagi, Central University of Karnataka, India.

(3) Ntenkeh Theodore, University of Bamenda, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhrigu Raj Mourya, MATS Law School, MATS University, India.

(2) Geeta Singh, JNKVV, India.

(3) Giuli Giguashvili, Gori State University, Georgia.

(4) M.Dinesh Kumar, Mannar Thirumalai Naicker College, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

(5) Pallavi Shaktawat, CPGSAS, Central Agricultural University, India.

(6) Prameela S Shetty, AJ Institute of Engineering and Management, India.

(7) Sanjay Yadav,  Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (VICTOR OCHIENG OTIENO, KENYA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kavita Sangolagi, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ntenkeh Theodore, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Norprolac-Induced Prolactin Suppression on Plasma Hormone Levels and Semen Quality of Karan Fries Crossbred Bulls during Summer

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Gonzalo Emiliano Aranda Abreu, Veracruzana University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Anam Shehzadi, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Eva A Ajaj, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(3) Jahanzaib Khaliq, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hassan Nima Habib, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(2) Ngassa Julius Mussa, Tanzania Livestock Research Institute, Tanzania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anam Shehzadi, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Eva A Ajaj, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jahanzaib Khaliq, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Therapeutic Management of Schistosoma spindale-induced Visceral Schistosomiasis in Cattle: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Sunday Charles Adeyemo, University of Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.

(2) Shwetha H S, Veterinary College, India.

(3) Babatunde Abdulrahman BELLO, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sunday Charles Adeyemo, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shwetha H S, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Babatunde Abdulrahman BELLO, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Digital Marketing, CASA and Promotion on Banking Marketing Performance: The Moderating Role of Competition

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Aleksandr Nikolaevich Sekisov, Kuban State Techno-logical University, Russia.

Reviewers:

(1) A. Sujatha, Cardamom Planters’ Association College, India.

(2) B.R. Kumar, Andhra Loyola College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kaushikkumar Patel, USA.

(2) Peter Varghese, Kannur University, De Paul Arts and Science College, India.

(3) Samara Mubeen, VTU, India.

(4) Tanmay Kandekar, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (A. Sujatha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B.R. Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Contrasting early vigor and water-use strategies regulate biomass partitioning and yield stability under water stress in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

(2) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University,  Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Alok Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(2) Rameshwar Rai, Madan Bhandari University of Science and Technology(MBUST), Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alok Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rameshwar Rai, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA