Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashutosh Kumar Singh, AKS University, India.

(2) Aditya Pokhrel, Nepal.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashutosh Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aditya Pokhrel, Nepal) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Moreira Martine Ramon Felipe, Associate Professor, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Mokhtari Sara, University of Ibn Khaldoun Tiaret, Algeria.

(2) Merve Bayhan, Dicle University, Turkiye.

(3) Ali Yildirim, Harran University, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.56/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mokhtari Sara, Algeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Merve Bayhan, Turkiye) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ali Yildirim, Turkiye) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Neha Toppo, Radha Govind University, India.

(2) Saleh Shehab Sabah, All Muthanna University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neha Toppo, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saleh Shehab Sabah, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Sayed Farrukh Ahmed, Daffodil International University, Bangladesh.

(2) N. Gnanasankaran, Thiagarajar College, India.

(3) Achinta Saikia, Mariani College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.86/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sayed Farrukh Ahmed, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N. Gnanasankaran, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Achinta Saikia, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Mustafa Riyadh ALshaheen, University of Anbar, Iraq.

(2) D. Gokul, Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.35/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mustafa Riyadh ALshaheen, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D. Gokul, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Assistant Professor, Al- Furat  Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Luz Adriana Pedraza Herrera, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia.

(2) Chrispo Makheti Mutebi, Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization, Kenya.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Luz Adriana Pedraza Herrera, Colombia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chrispo Makheti Mutebi, Kenya) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Anil Kumar, Head (Retired), School of Biotechnology, Devi Ahilya University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rameto Roba Gure, Wachemo University, Ethiopia.

(2) Asit Prasad Dash, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rameto Roba Gure, Ethiopia) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asit Prasad Dash, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Abubaker Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Elayis, University of Bahri, Sudan.

(2) Saraswat Sahoo, India.

(3) Razvan Nicolae Malancus, “Ion Ionescu de la Brad” Iasi University of Life Sciences, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abubaker Ahmed Mohamed Ahmed Elayis, Sudan) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saraswat Sahoo, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Razvan Nicolae Malancus, Romania) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Natural Sciences Center, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramanakar Reddy Danda, UK.

(2) Joseph Chukwunweike, UK.

(3) Rahimoddin Mohammed, United States.

(4) Kanaka Rakesh Varma Kothapalli, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.12/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ramanakar Reddy Danda, UK) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Joseph Chukwunweike, UK) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rahimoddin Mohammed, United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Kanaka Rakesh Varma Kothapalli, United States of America) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, Scientist, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, India.

Reviewers:

(1) L. A. Magashi, Kaduna State College Of Education Gidan Waya, Nigeria.

(2) Pranav Raj, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (L. A. Magashi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pranav Raj, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA