Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Itamar S. Oliveira-Júnior, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

(2) Dr. Patnala Mohan Patro, GITAM Deemed to be  University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Madhusudhan Nc, Bangalore Baptist Hospital, India.

(2) Abhijit Chakma, Regional Research Institute of Homoeopathy, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Madhusudhan NC, Bangalore Baptist Hospital, India.

(2) Pablo González Uriel, HM La Esperanza, HM Hospitals, Spain.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Madhusudhan Nc, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abhijit Chakma, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ankit Sanjay Varshney, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, India.

(2) Ragni Kumari, UPUMS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.65/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ankit Sanjay Varshney, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ragni Kumari, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Halim Zeghdoudi, Badji-Mokhtar University , Algeria.

Reviewers:

(1) W. Samuel, Jamal Mohamed College, Bharathidasan University, India.

(2) Micheal Vincent Abiodun, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (W. Samuel, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Micheal Vincent Abiodun, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Maria Emilia Cosenza Andraus, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro/UFRJ, RJ, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) M Bharath Bala, India.

(2) Borkhatariya Avi Sanjaykumar, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aprajita Panwar, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Inba Raja A, Bhaarath Medical College and Hospital, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (M Bharath Bala, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Borkhatariya Avi Sanjaykumar, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.  Ravi Kumar Chittoria, JIPMER, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Halidu Imurana, Lucknow University, India.

(2) Franco Johny V, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nasim Mirzaei, School of Public Health, University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Halidu Imurana, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Franco Johny V, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Adlina Binti Suleiman, National Defence University Of Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Prof. Maged Refaat, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Sushila Ladumor, Qatar.

(2) Rohit Kumar Singh, Atal Bihari Vajpayee Medical University UP, India.

(3) Reza Widianto Sudjud, Padjajaran University, Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Indonesia.

(4) Arwa Mohammed Salih, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Akhilesh Patel, SGTCOP, SGT University, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.12/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sushila Ladumor, Qatar) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rohit Kumar Singh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Reza Widianto Sudjud, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Arwa Mohammed Salih, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Levent SON, The University of Mersin, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sripriya, Dravidian University, India.

(2) Manohara Acharya, India.

(3) Heronima d. Sanchez, Benguet State University, Philippines.

(4) Romita Devi, MLSM College Sundernagar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Gopal Krishna Padhy, Centurion University of Technology and Management, India.

(2) Obi Olor Patience, University of Education and Entrepreneurship, Akamkpa, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.43/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sripriya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Manohara Acharya, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Heronima d. Sanchez, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Romita Devi, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Huan-Liang Tsai, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed E. Abouelregal, Jouf University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Moustapha OUALI, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Morocco.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed E. Abouelregal, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Moustapha OUALI, Morocco) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Veronica Mîndrescu, Transilvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Ankit Kumar, Usha Martin University, India.

(2) Austin Uchegbu, National Open University of Nigeria, Abuja.

(3) Ivanka Vasilevska, Republic of North Macedonia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adebusola Dada, Federal University Wukari, Nigeria.

(2) Eke, Chigozi, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

(3) Muhammad Gooshi Dehaghi, Baqyatallah University of Medical Science, Iran.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.76/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ankit Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Austin Uchegbu, Abuja) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ivanka Vasilevska, Republic of North Macedonia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Abdullah Aydin, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Ketsunee Taweekaew, Thailand National Sports University, Thailand.

(2) Alvin Lacaba, Eastern Samar State University Guiuan Campus, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Benhur A. Asid, Western Mindanao State University, Philippines.

(2) Madeline Meno_Salvino, University of Baguio, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.05/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ketsunee Taweekaew, Thailand) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alvin Lacaba, Philippines) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA