Peer Review History: Assessing Sensory Acceptability of Ginger-Turmeric based Functional Beverage by Fuzzy Logic Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guillermo Yanowsky Reyes, Old Civil Hospital of Guadalajara “Fray Antonio Alcalde”, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Kanchan Bhatt, Dr.Yashwant Singh Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

(2) Anindita Deb Pal, J.D. Birla Institute, Kolkata, India.

(3) Weka Gusmiarty Abdullah, Universitas Halu Oleo, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) I Made Sugitha, Udayana University, Indonesia.

(2) Carlos Javier Lopez-Victorio, Universidad Juarez Autonoma de Tabasco, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kanchan Bhatt, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anindita Deb Pal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Weka Gusmiarty Abdullah, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Supplementing Ovirich® on Carcass Characteristics and Ovarian Follicular Development of White Leghorn Layers

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ricardo Stefani, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Dipanjan Chakraborty, College of Veterinary Sciences & A.H, India.

(2) Shailendra Kumar Rajak, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Guillermo Fuentes-Dávila, Mexican National Institute for Forestry, Agriculture, and Livestock Research, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dipanjan Chakraborty, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shailendra Kumar Rajak, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Relationship between Leaf Area Index and Lysimetric Crop Coefficients of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L.) under Local Climatic Conditions of Vidarbha

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Newton De Lucena Costa, Brazil.

(2) Arnab Roy Chowdhury, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rajashree Khatua, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Newton De Lucena Costa, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arnab Roy Chowdhury, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of the Fertilizing Properties of Rabbit Urine Combined with Cattle Manure on the Growth and Yield of Maize

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nurul Puspita Palupi, Universitas Mulawarman, Indonesia.

(2) Ashutosh Singh, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nurul Puspita Palupi, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ashutosh Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Morphotectonic and Morphometric Analysis of the Nirguna (Bhikund) River Watershed of Akola and Washim Districs, Maharashtra, India, Using Remote Sensing and GIS

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed M. El Nady, Egyptian Petroleum Research Institute, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Prince Chukwuemeka, Nigeria.

(2) Roman Hnativ, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Habtamu Deribe, Bonga University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prince Chukwuemeka, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Roman Hnativ, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrated Geomorphological Assessment of the Nirguna (Bhikund) River Watershed Using Remote Sensing and GIS Technique

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Atef Mohamed Fathy Mohammed, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Bharat L Gadakh, K.R.T Arts,B.H.Commerce and A.M.Science(KTHM) College, India.

(2) Chibuogwu Ikechukwu, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ardalan afrasiabian, Graz University of technology, Austria.

(2) Zohreh Kazemi Motlagh, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bharat L Gadakh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chibuogwu Ikechukwu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Influence of Socio-Demographic Factors on the Pedagogical Competence of Social Studies Teachers

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Rajendra Parsad Gunputh, The University of Mauritius, Réduit, Mauritius

Reviewers:

(1) Vandana Punia, Guru Jambheshwar University of S&T, India.

(2) G Thippanna, Dr K V Subbareddy Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Benjamin Takyi, University of Education, Winneba, Ghana.

(2) Hamdy Ahmed Mahmoud Hamed, Faculty of Education, Helwan University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vandana Punia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (G Thippanna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Case Report of Pathological Perspectives of Sialolithiasis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Joao Paulo Schwartz, Federal University (FAO-UFAM), Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Nina Nilawati, Universitas Hang Tuah, Indonesia.

(2) Sanika Kalambe Ghate, Datta Meghe Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nina Nilawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sanika Kalambe Ghate, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Geneticin Lethal Dose for Effective NPT-II Selection in Transgenic Sugarcane (Genotype CoC671)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Alessandro Buccolieri, University of Salento, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Fitri Damayanti, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia.

(2) V C Raghavendra, University of Agricultural Sciences Raichur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fitri Damayanti, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V C Raghavendra, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Cost-Benefit Dynamics of Cybersecurity Compliance Investments: A Multi-Sectoral Analysis Across Financial, Energy and Intelligence Industries

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

(2) Dr. K J. Sreekanth, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research (KISR), Kuwait.

Reviewers:

(1) Sanjib Kumar Shil, International American University, USA.

(2) Annbeth B. Calla, Rizal Memorial Colleges, Philippines.

(3) Feyisayo Ogunyemi Michael, Eastern Illinois University, United State of America.

(4) Adesiyan Taiwo Fausiyat, Middle Tennesses State University, United States of America.

(5) Ahmed ElHamahmy, Cairo University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amilcar Marcelo Varela Enríquez, Institute of Higher National Studies – The State Postgraduate University of Ecuador, Ecuador.

(2) Cavin Jeffry Mudimba, International Training College – Lingua and JS Business Consulting CC, Namibia.

(3) Hananiya, Philemon, Modibbo Adama University, Yola, Nigeria.

(4) Oluomachi Ejiofor, Austine Peay State University, USA.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sanjib Kumar Shil, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Annbeth B. Calla, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Feyisayo Ogunyemi Michael, United State of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Adesiyan Taiwo Fausiyat, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_5 (Ahmed ElHamahmy, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | J. ch from AJARR to JENRR | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA