Peer Review History: An Experimental Study on the Effect of Foamed Concrete Bulk Density on its Thermal and Mechanical Properties

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hasan Köten, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Türkiye.

(2) Prof. Huan-Liang Tsai, Da-Yeh University, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Reviewers:

(1) Fatima Abou-Nouh, Morocco.

(2) Shreyas N Harithsa, India.

(3) Kehinde Marvellous Ajekiigbe, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Fatima Abou-Nouh, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shreyas N Harithsa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kehinde Marvellous Ajekiigbe, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: HERBAL COSMETICS AND COSMECEUTICALS: A NATURAL APPROACH TO SKIN, HAIR, AND ORAL CARE

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Syed A. A. Rizvi , Larkin University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Jyoti Dattatray Anap, Dr. Kolpe Institute of Pharmacy Kolpewadi, India.

(2) Dipak Dadasaheb Nalawade, Dr. Kolpe Institute of Pharmacy Kolpewadi, India.

(3) Calugar Anamaria, University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj Napoca, Romania.

(4) Alexandru Diana Mihaela, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jyoti Dattatray Anap, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dipak Dadasaheb Nalawade, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Calugar Anamaria, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Alexandru Diana Mihaela, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of Clinical and Metabolic Profiles in Insulin-Resistant and Non-Resistant Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Xuzhou Normal University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Erna Yovi Kurniawati, Alma Ata University, Indonesia.

(2) Thualfiqar Ghalib Turki, Al-Qasim Green University , Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Erna Yovi Kurniawati, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thualfiqar Ghalib Turki, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Knowledge Assessment and Practice of Insulin Storage and Administration Techniques among Diabetic Mellitus Patients

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Juan Carlos Troiano, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Reviewers:

(1) Suryanaryayana Bettadpura Shamanna, JIPMER, India.

(2) Prerna Khati, Mangalyatan University, India.

(3) Dilek Gogas Yavuz, Marmara University Medical School, Turkey.

(4) T. Devi, V.V.Vanniaperumal College for Women, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Harun Achmad, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.12/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Suryanaryayana Bettadpura Shamanna, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prerna Khati, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Dilek Gogas Yavuz, Turkey) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (T. Devi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Chloroform Fraction of Methanol Extract of Funtumia Elastica (Preuss) Stem Bark Induces Mitochondrial-Mediated Cell Death Via Mitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore Opening

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Cruz-Sosa, Autonomous Metropolitan University, Mexico.

Reviewers:

(1) Hezron Mutisya Muindi, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

(2) Abdul M Ukratalo, Universitas Pattimura, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hezron Mutisya Muindi, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abdul M Ukratalo, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Physiological and Nutritional Adaptation Mechanisms of Domestic and Wild Animals in Upper Himalayan Region: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Preeya Puangsomlee Wangsomnuk, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

(2) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Anupama Mahato, Govt. E. Raghavendra Rao P.G. Science College, India.

(2) Mainak Banerjee, RKDF University, India.

(3) Eli Pavlova-Traykova, Forest Research Institute at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rukayya Garba Anchau, Nigerian Institute for Trypanosomiasis Research (NITR), Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anupama Mahato, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mainak Banerjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Eli Pavlova-Traykova, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Analysis of Pollen Viability and Germination Efficiency among Guava Genotypes

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Gayathri J, Anna University, India.

(2) Archana Hemant Patil, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gayathri J, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Archana Hemant Patil, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Flower Yield and Shelf Life of Gaillardia

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho, State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Firoozeh Chamandoosti, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, Agricultural Research, Iran.

(2) Indrani Kakati, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Firoozeh Chamandoosti, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Indrani Kakati, USA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phytochemistry, evaluation of biological activities and cytotoxicity of leaves and seeds of the plant Lawsonia inermis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ho Soon Min, INTI International University, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahesh Kumar Posa, National University, Jagatpura, India.

(2) Shuaibu Zaharaddeen, SA’ADU Zungur University, Nigeria.

(3) Sanjeet Kumar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Mahesh Kumar Posa, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shuaibu Zaharaddeen, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sanjeet Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Regeneration of Spent Transformer Oil Using Bentonite Clay and Palm Kernel Shell

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) William Nathan T. Rodriguez, San Isidro College IBED, Philippines.

(2) V. Hariharan, Paavai College Of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kalu M. Kalu, Gombe State University, Nigeria.

(2) V.Hariharan, Paavai College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers: (Comments received after deadline)

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (William Nathan T. Rodriguez, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (V. Hariharan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA