Peer Review History: Urban Tree Diversity and Conservation Challenges in Thiruvallur District, Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Manish Kumar, Career Point University Kota, India.

(2) Ikfanny Alfi Muhibbah Shalihah, IPB University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) DJIGUEMDE Félix, Nazi BONI University, Burkina Faso.

(2) Malini Shetty A.G, Surana College, Bangalore University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manish Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ikfanny Alfi Muhibbah Shalihah, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Application of High-concentration 35 kDa Hyaluronic Acid Fragment Gel in the Treatment of Mild Gingival Recession and Periodontal Inflammation: A Case Series

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, And University of Mississipi Medical Center,, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Shankar S Menon, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) Quroti A’yun, Indonesia.

(3) Marde Shraddha Kashinath, Esic Dental College Kalaburagi, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chandrashekhar B Badwaik, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University, India.

(2) Deepak Grover, Bhojia Dental College And Hospital, India.

(3) Rishitha Sajja, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shankar S Menon, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Quroti A’yun, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Marde Shraddha Kashinath, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Separating the Temporal Dynamics and Wealth Inequalities in Early Childbearing: Multilevel Statistical Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Yahya H. Y. Alfarra, University of Ottawa, Canada.

(2)  Khakimov Boburbek Akmaljon Ugli, Oriental University, Uzbekistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kannan K, Chettinadu Public School, India.

(2) Micheal Vincent Abiodun, Federal Polytechnic Bida, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yahya H. Y. Alfarra, Canada) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khakimov Boburbek Akmaljon Ugli, Uzbekistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Development of a Novel Method for Disease Severity Driven Variable Rate Chemical Application Based on Plant Morphological Indicators

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed,Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt And Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) J. Selvin Paul Peter, SRM Insitute of Science and Technology, India.

(2) Chairuddin, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.I. Delighta Mano Joyce, Sadakathullah Appa College, India.

(2) Pratibha Bhowmick, Muktadhara  Institute of Medical Science, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (J. Selvin Paul Peter, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chairuddin, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Statistical Analysis of Millets Area, Production and Yield in India with Focus on Assam

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang,Tainan University of Technology,Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Anandraj K.C, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

(2) D. B. Shanmugam, SRM IST, Ramapuram, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kou Hayakawa, Japan.

(2) P.Pushpa, St. Peter’s Institute of higher Education and Research, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anandraj K.C, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D. B. Shanmugam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Computational Investigation of Eugenol–triazole Derivatives Targeting Breast Cancer Proteins

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, Clinical Research Support Office, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Amitesh Chakraborty, Flemming College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) KNV Chenchu Lakshmi, K L College of Pharmacy, INDIA.

(3) Priyanka Panth, Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(4) Ankur Thakur , Himalayan Institute of Pharmacy Kala AMB, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Atul R. Bendale, Mahavir Institute of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Kosisochukwu Onyeagba, University of Cincinnati, USA.

(3) Somkant Vasantrao Jawarkar, S.D. Patil Institute of Pharmacy, India.

(4) Sumita Kumari, Puran Murti College of Pharmacy, India.

(5) Vasandiya  Kinjal, Shree Dhanvantary Pharmacy College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amitesh Chakraborty, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (KNV Chenchu Lakshmi, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Priyanka Panth, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Ankur Thakur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cost-Effectiveness and Reliability of Gas and Diesel Energy Supply for Telecommunication Base Stations: A Comparative Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Aleksey Khlopytskyi, Ukrainian State University of Chemical Technology, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Wulfran Fendzi Mbasso, University of Douala, Cameroon.

(2) Prajwal Kumar Chinthoju, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, United States.

(3) Akhil Nigam, Chandigarh University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wulfran Fendzi Mbasso, Cameroon) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prajwal Kumar Chinthoju, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Akhil Nigam, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impaired Angiogenesis and Inflammation in Preeclampsia: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sandra Aparecida Marinho, Paraíba State University (UniversidadeEstadual da Paraíba – UEPB), Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Hediye Dagdeviren, Istanbul Aydin University, Turkiye.

(2) Ayesha Siddika, United Hospital Limited, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdirahman Moalim Hassan Ibrahimm, Aden Adde International University, Somalia.

(2) Aysha Raza, A&U Tibbiya College Hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hediye Dagdeviren, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ayesha Siddika, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Structural Analysıs of Turkısh Agrıculture: Regıonal Profıles, Concentratıon and Change Trends (2015-2024)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, The State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhilan Gangadaran, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Bhavana Tomar, GD Goenka University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Cephas Chisanga, Affiliated to Bangor University, School of Environment and Natural Resources, UK.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhilan Gangadaran, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bhavana Tomar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comparative Field Analysis of Wheat Genotypes Differing in Fusarium Head Blight Resistance

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Mohammed Jard Kadhim, Al- Furat Al- Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

Reviewers:

(1) Ratna Dewi, Lampung State Polytechnic, Indonesia.

(2) José Oliveira Dantas, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Sergipe, Brazil.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Priyanka Sinha, Bundelkhand University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ratna Dewi, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (José Oliveira Dantas, Brazil) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA