Peer Review History: Achieving Optimal Patient Outcomes After Frontal Sinus Endoscopy

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Debashis Acharya, Primary Healthcare Corporation, QATAR.

(2) Ramesh Varadharajan, Dr. M.G.R. Educational and Research Institute University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Keshav Gupta, Shri Shankaracharya Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Debashis Acharya, QATAR) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ramesh Varadharajan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Medicinal Phytodiversity in Cocoa Agroforestry Systems and Well-Being of Local Communities in Department of Daloa, Central West, Côte d’Ivoire

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Serdar DUSEN, Pamukkale University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Sobia Sarwar, Lahore college for women university, Pakistan.

(2) Rodine TCHIOFO LONTSI, University of Ebolowa, Cameroon.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kouakou Yao Bertin, Université Jean Lorougnon Guédé de Daloa, Côte d’Ivoire.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sobia Sarwar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rodine TCHIOFO LONTSI, Cameroon) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Acute Severe Encephalomyelitis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Charbell Miguel Haddad Kury, University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Blessed Takunda Mukuhlani, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe.

(2) Chinmayee Priyadarshini Khuntia, KIIT Deemed University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Siddhant Krishna, Gopal Narayan Singh University, India.

(2) Zainab AbdelAziz AbdelMoaty Arafa, Abasia Fever Hospital, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Blessed Takunda Mukuhlani, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chinmayee Priyadarshini Khuntia, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Role of elicitors on growth attributes of sacred basil (Ocimum sanctum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Singh, India.

(2) Raghupathi B, KSCSTE- Malabar Botanical Garden and Institute for Plant Sciences, India.

(3) Alaa M. Dh. Al-Haidari, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Elsayed abdelmaksoud  Abo-Marzoka, Egypt.

(2) Newton de Lucena Costa, Brazil.

(3) R. Ravikumar, PSG College of Arts & Science, India.

(4) Ragab Sebaita Kandil, Plant Protection Research Institute, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhishek Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Raghupathi B, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Alaa M. Dh. Al-Haidari, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impact of elicitors on herbage yield, biotic stress management and benefit cost ratio of sacred basil (Ocimum sanctum L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Tsygankova Victoria Anatolyivna, V.P. Kukhar Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry and Petrochemistry of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Chetan Pundlikrao Bhagat, K. H. College, India.

(2) Isiogugu Ogechukwu Nnanyelugo, University of Nigeria Nsukka, Nigeria.

(3) K. Prakash, SRM College of Agricultural Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chetan Pundlikrao Bhagat, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Isiogugu Ogechukwu Nnanyelugo, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (K. Prakash, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Orthodontic Space Closure and Molar Protraction in the Presence of Advanced Periodontal Disease: A Multidisciplinary Treatment Approach

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) R.S.Pavithra, Dr MGR Medical University, India.

(2) Jishna Vaghela, College of Dental Science and Hospital, India.

(3) Ghazal Shabankare, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mohammad Younis Hajeer, University of Damascus, Syrian.

(2) Naorem Jenny, PD Dental And Health Care, India.

(3) Noha Mohammed Ismael Awad El-Adl, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(4) Roohollah Safarpour, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (R.S.Pavithra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jishna Vaghela, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ghazal Shabankare, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Estimates of Genetic Divergence in Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) germplasm

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Shiamala Devi Ramaiya, Universiti Putra Malaysia Bintulu Sarawak Campus, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) V.V. Ujjainkar, Dr. PDKV, India.

(2) Saurabh Godara, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (V.V. Ujjainkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saurabh Godara, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Transplanting Dates on Yield of Basmati Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Mid-Hill Conditions of Himachal Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hon H. Ho (Retd.), State University of New York, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Aparna Gunjal, Dr. D.Y. Patil, Arts, Commerce & Science College, India.

(2) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(3) Basant Kumar Dadarwal , Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Essaid Bilal, France.

(2) Shahira H. EL-Moslamy, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Aparna Gunjal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Marwan Noori Ramadhan, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Basant Kumar Dadarwal, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Protein, Fatty Acid Profile and Microbiological Assessment of Contamination Route in Traditional Milk Handling of Cow and Goat Milk in Southwestern Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Bechan Sharma, University of Allahabad, Allahabad, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Garima Kumari, India.

(2) Julio Cesar Queiroz Penha, Federal Fluminense University, Brazil.

(3) Vjollca Durro, University of Medicine, TIRANA, Albania.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Garima Kumari, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Julio Cesar Queiroz Penha, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vjollca Durro, Albania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sepsis-induced Acute Kidney Injury in Women Undergoing Pelvic and Abdominal Surgery

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Darko Nozic, General hospital Acibadem Belmedic Belgrade, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Richa Dodiya, ITM SLS Baroda University, India.

(2) Ali Namvaran, University of Nebraska Medical Centre, USA.

(3) Asghar Khan , Khpal Kor Nursing and Health Sciences College, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abreha Tsegay Gebreselassie, Mekelle University, Ethiopia.

(2) Ebru Gokalp Ozkorkmaz, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Turkiye.

(3) Gonzalo Arturo Medina Bueno, National University of San Agustin of Arequipa, Perú.

(4) Md. Ruhul Amin, Rajshahi Medical College, Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Richa Dodiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Namvaran, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Asghar Khan, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA