Peer Review History: Dynamic response of a QLY tower crane under pulsating wind loads in the wind direction

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Elangovan, B.S.Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Manoj Maruti Dongare, University of Mumbai, India.

(2) Jonnala Subba Reddy, Lakireddy Bali Reddy College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Eladraoui Imad, Universite Hassan I, Morocco.

(2) Imad El Adraoui, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Morocco.

(3) Kiran Kumar Amireddy, CBIT Hyderabad, India.

(4) Rade Vasiljevic, Republic of Serbia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manoj Maruti Dongare, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jonnala Subba Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: High-Strength Steel Reinforced Composite Slabs: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bharatish A, RV College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Engy Mohamed Kassem, Mansoura Higher Institute of Engineering and Technology, Egypt.

(2) Bandhavya G B, Navkis College of Engineering Hassan-Karnataka, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abba Alfanda, Southeast University, China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Engy Mohamed Kassem, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bandhavya G B, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Comprehensive Review of Reinforcement Learning: From Classical Frameworks to Deep Learning Paradigms

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jichao Sun, China University of Geosciences, China.

Reviewers:

(1) S. Sheik Shalik, Annamalai University, India.

(2) Vikash Kumar, Amity University Patna, India.

(3) Ajayi Abisoye, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhavesh Kataria, Kadi Sarva Vishwavidyalaya, India.

(2) Kenneth Besigomwe, Makerere University, Uganda.

(3) Nikita Yogesh Kapadnis, SCTR’s Pune Institute of Computer Technology, India.

(4) Zeeshan Modi, Bremen University, Germany.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (S. Sheik Shalik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vikash Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ajayi Abisoye, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Role of Company Culture in Migrant Employee Retention: The Case of Turkish Service Sector

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

(2) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Kurniawan Arif Maspul, Al-Madinah International University, Malaysia.

(2) D Somasekhar, GITAM University , India.

(3) Aajaz Ahmad Hajam, Tashkent International University of Education, Uzbekistan.

(4) Mahua Biswas, United Kingdom.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jane N. Njenga, The Co-operative University of Kenya, Kenya.

(2) Vinod Kumar, Vallabh Government College India.

(3) Brad Bell, South Africa.

(4) Eddy Winarso, Jenderal Achmad Yani University, Indonesia.

(5) Faez Nasser Ali Mugahed, College of Applied and Human Sciences-Amran University, Yemen.

(6) Gaurav Kumar, P P Savani University, India.

(7) Harshika Gupta, Lords University, India.

(8) Hemraj Kawadkar, S. B. Jain Institute of Technology, India.

(9) Pooja Singh, The M.S. University of Baroda, India.

(10) Rohan Singh, Chandigarh University, India.

(11) Sandya Rani Padala, Vaagdevi Degree and PG College, India.

(12) Segun Idowu Adeniyi, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nigeria.

(13) Slim Chtiouim, FSEG SFAX, Tunisia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.22/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kurniawan Arif Maspul, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (D Somasekhar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aajaz Ahmad Hajam, Uzbekistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Mahua Biswas, United Kingdom) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Personal and Socio-economic Characteristics of Date Palm Growers of Banaskantha and Patan District of Gujarat, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Daniele De Wrachien, State University of Milan, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Manoj Kumar Das, Sri Sri University, India.

(2) Alka Parikh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abdul Hadi Wasil, Afghanistan National Agricultural Sciences and Technology University-ANASTU, Afghanistan.

(2) Arulmanikandan B, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(3) Balaji G, Annamalai University, India.

(4) Gayathri Devi S.S, India.

(5) Ghanshyam Dos, Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti Language University, India.

(6) R. Anbuselvi, Holy Cross College (Autonomous), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manoj Kumar Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Alka Parikh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Vegetative and Flowering Behaviour of Jasmine (Jasminum sambac) as Influenced by Pruning and Bio-Regulators

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Neeraj Nath Parihar , Sardar Patel University Dongariya Madhya Pradesh, India.

(2) Aparajita Das,Swami Vivekananda Mahavidyalaya, India.

(3) Khem Raj Sharma, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Safaa M Elmesalamy, Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neeraj Nath Parihar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aparajita Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Khem Raj Sharma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Diagnostic Utility of Bone Marrow Biopsy in Haematological Malignancies: A Seven Year Retrospective Study from Nigeria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim O. Farah, Jackson State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Kirolos Eskandar , Helwan University , Egypt.

(2) Prema Saldanha, Yenepoya Medical College, India.

(3) Megha Agrawal , ASMC, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amal Abdulilah Alkshab, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(2) Ghada Abd Alrhman Taqa, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul, Iraq.

(3) Jonas Michel Wolf, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Brazil.

(4) Sushanta kumar Sahoo, Bareilly International University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kirolos Eskandar, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prema Saldanha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Megha Agrawal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Commercial-Scale Production of Immunoglobulin Y-Enriched Whole Egg Powder Using Two Fluid Nozzle Spray Dryer

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Manal Abdel Rahman Sorour, Agriculture Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Jeniffer Clorives Lopes Batista, Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM), Brazil.

(2) Sunandita Ghosh, Purdue University, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adil Usman, Harbin Institute of Technology, China.

(2) Geeta Verma, Institute for Excellence in Higher Education, India.

(3) Yahya, Indonesia.

(4) Lakhvinder Kaur, MRIIRS, India.

(5) Lina Sameer  Mohammed, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jeniffer Clorives Lopes Batista, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sunandita Ghosh, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Unraveling Pest-Weather Dynamics: A Stepwise Regression Approach on Major Pests in Rice

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

Reviewers:

(1) Yusuf Aminu , Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(2) Kamal Yadav, Nagaland University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ali Al-Maliki, Iraq.

(2) Sumanta Kumar Basak, Barind Multipurpose Development Authority (BMDA), Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Yusuf Aminu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kamal Yadav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of Agrometeorological Efficiencies, Phenothermal Index and Yield of Brinjal Varieties under Different Growing Environment

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Eman Abbas Muhsin, Iraq.

(2) Ştefan Ţălu, The Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Pochamreddy Sireesha Devi, Anurag University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Eman Abbas Muhsin, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ştefan Ţălu, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA