Peer Review History: Melatonin: A Comprehensive Review of Pharmacological Uses and Recent Advances

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Chan-Min Liu, Xuzhou Normal University, China.

(2) Dr. Takashi Ikeno, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan.

Reviewers:

(1) Akihiro Nakamura, Japan.

(2) Maya Kalyani Srivathsan, Dr Dy Patil School of Medicine, India.

(3) Amitava Khan, Sonarpur Mahavidyalaya, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Akihiro Nakamura, Japan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maya Kalyani Srivathsan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amitava Khan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Journal Change TO JPRI FROM JAMMR | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Comprehensive and Progressive Evidence-Based Physiotherapy for Lateral Epicondylitis in a Female Domestic Worker: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Talha Bin Emran,BGC Trust University Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Neeti Christian, Gujarat University, India.

(2) Nand Kishor Prasad Sah, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

(3) Kanchan Kholiya, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Praveen Kumar Dasari, Mother Teresa Pharmacy College, India.

(2) Mukesh Shinde, Dr. Ulhas Patil College of Physiotherapy, India.

(3) Shreya Upadhyay, Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, SPB Physiotherapy College, India.

(4) Somsankar Mukherjee, IGTAMSU, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Neeti Christian, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nand Kishor Prasad Sah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kanchan Kholiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Market Access as the Missing Link: How Structured and Pooled Procurement Can Unlock Nigeria’s Health Manufacturing Potential

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

(2) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Kumsa Negasa Regasa, Ethiopia.

(2) Ifrat Jahan, Bangladesh.

(3) Priyanka Joshi, Pal College of Nursing and Medical Sciences , India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Haider Mohammed Majeed, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Uttam Khanal, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kumsa Negasa Regasa, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ifrat Jahan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Priyanka Joshi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Critical Review on Optimization of Water Use in Vegetable Crops using IoT-Based Low-Cost Sensors

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mohamed Fadel, National Research Center, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Paradkar Vinayak Digambar, Govt. College of Agriculture, India.

(2) Theodore Azemtsop Manfo, University of Vaasa, Finland.

(3) Shoma Hore, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Babasaheb Dnyandeo Patil, Bharati Vidyapeeth BVDU Pune, Institute of Management IMRDA, India.

(2) Shoma Hore, Anti-corruption Commission, Bangladesh.

(3) Warji, Universitas Lampung, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Paradkar Vinayak Digambar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Theodore Azemtsop Manfo, Finland) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Shoma Hore, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Impacted Teeth vs Immediate Post-extraction Implants: A Review of Survival, Marginal Bone Loss, and Complications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Rameshwari Thakur, Muzaffarnagar Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Nabin Kumar Chaudhary, Nepalgunj Medical College, Nepal.

(2) Neha Singh, Dr. NTR University of Health sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Divyashree.P, MES Dental College affiliated to KUHS, India.

(2) Esraa K. Al – Gazzi, Iraq.

(3) Lakshmi Senkumar, ECU School of Dental medicine, USA.

(4) Nina Nilawati, Hang Tuah University, Indonesia.

(5) Ruchi Saini, Subharti Dental College, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

(6) Sunny Mavi, Sudha Rustagi College of Dental Sciences & Research, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nabin Kumar Chaudhary, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Neha Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Microbiological Quality of Soy-based Products (Milk and Yogurt) Collected in Ouagadougou

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Tri I. Wirjantoro, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

(2) Inkorena G. S. Sukartono, Nasional University, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Md. Ashikur Rahman, Bangladesh Fisheries Research Institute, Bangladesh.

(2) Kabange Kasumbwe, Durban University of Technology, South Africa.

(3) Rohini Pandurang Kamble, Swami Ramanand Teerth Marathwada University, India.

(4) Udayalaxmi Jeppu, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal University, India.

(5) Venkata Naga Jyothi Nakka, KLEF Deemed to be University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Tri I. Wirjantoro, Thailand) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Inkorena G. S. Sukartono, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Feasibility of Different Vegetable Crops as Intercrop in Sandalwood

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Irena Malinowska, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University,Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Rashmi Ramesh Shanbhag, Institute of Wood Science and Technology, India.

(2) Shashi Kumar, Dr. YSR Horticultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) G Venu Gopal, India.

(2) Niraj Kumar Prajapati, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University (A Central University), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rashmi Ramesh Shanbhag, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shashi Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Guinea

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Padavala Kranthi Kumar, MK Diagnostics and Research Laboratory, India.

(2) Richa Dodiya, ITM SLS Baroda University, India.

(3) Rahul Warmoota, Guru Nanak Paramedical College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jaynesh K. Ambechada, J M Science College & P.G. Center, India.

(2) Mojtaba Ghorbani Asiabar, Payam Noor University, Islamic Republic of Iran.

(3) Ananjan Chatterjee, Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, India.

(4) Ramamoorthy, Pondicherry University, India.

(5) Jayaprada Rao Chunduri, India.

(6) Longchi Satkat Zacchaeus, University of Jos, Nigeria.

(7) Mohamed Wael Abd Al-Azeem Mohamed, Qena university, Egypt.

(8) Orogu Joshua Othuke, Delta State University of Science and Technology Ozoro (Now Southern Delta University Ozoro), Nigeria.

(9) Sonawane Bhimraj Natha, MES’s Arts, Commerce and Science College Sonai, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Padavala Kranthi Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Richa Dodiya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rahul Warmoota, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: COLLAB-LLM: A Communication-Centric Role-Based Framework for Scalable Multi-Agent LLM Collaboration

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Mahmoud Owais, Assiut University, Egypt.

(2) Niranjan Mohapatra, World Skill Center, India.

(3) Girmay Mengesha Azanaw, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.

(4) Iman Farhadian Dehkordi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aarti Rani, Lucknow Public College of Professionals, India.

(2) B.V. RamaKrishna, Vignan Institute of Technology and Science, India.

(3) Christian Chukwuemeka Nzeanorue, George Washington University, United States.

(4) Godwin Ededem Udo, University of Uyo, Nigeria.

(5) Syeda Hafsa Naaz, Bharat Institute of Engineering and Technology, India.

(6) Ubaid Asif Farooqui, Maharishi University of Information Technology, India.

(7) Christian Chukwuemeka Nzeanorue, George Washington University, United States.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 6.87/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 ( Mahmoud Owais, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Niranjan Mohapatra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 ( Girmay Mengesha Azanaw, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Iman Farhadian Dehkordi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrating Recursive Feature Elimination Technique To A Balanced Clustered Mental Health Data

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Dariusz Jacek Jakóbczak, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Jejeniwa Temitayo Oluwaseun, Nigeria.

(2) Mahesh Balasaheb Chougule, DKTE Society’s Textile and Engineering Institute, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ali H. Wheeb, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Shaik Asha Begum, KVSR Siddhartha College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

(3) Sudheer Padikkal, Government of Kerala, India.

(4) Vahid, University Tehran, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jejeniwa Temitayo Oluwaseun, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mahesh Balasaheb Chougule, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA