Peer Review History: A Lightweight Hybrid Model for Securing Medical Images Using LSB Watermarking, ECIES and AES-CTR

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Federal University of Piaui, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Anuradha Reddy, SriDevi Women’s Engineering College, India.

(2) Pavan A C, PES University, India.

(3) Tanay Shah, Swarrnim Startup and Innovation University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M. Rajasekar, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, India.

(2) Piyush Raja, Vishun Roy College, India.

(3) Vuna Venkata Vidyasagar, Raghu Engineering College, University College of Vizianagaram, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anuradha Reddy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pavan A C, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tanay Shah, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Cost and Returns Analysis of Sugarcane Production in Coimbatore District, Tamil Nadu, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Nebi Bilir, Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Paulino A Onal, Catholic Ming Yuan College, Philippines.

(2) Remmiya Rajan P, Zamorins Guruvayurappan College, Affiliated to University of Calicut, India.

(3) Adeola Babatunde , Premier College of Education in Affiliation with Ekiti State University Degree Distant Learning, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) H.Chandrashekar, University of Agricultural Science, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Paulino A Onal, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Remmiya Rajan P, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Adeola Babatunde , Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Immunohistochemical Effects of Lutein on Paraquat-induced Toxicity in Kidneys and Liver of Adult Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Nicolás Padilla-Raygoza, Institute of Public Health from Guanajuato State, México.

Reviewers:

(1) Alina Atif, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Pakistan.

(2) Quratulann Sattar, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(3) Ghasem Habibi, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S.K.Periyasamy, Jamal Mohamed College (Autonomous), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alina Atif, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Quratulann Sattar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ghasem Habibi, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Uterine Rupture in a Didelphic Uterus: A Rare Case Report of Intrauterine Foetal Demise in a Primigravida

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Maged Refaat, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Khalid Hussein Bakheit Ahmed, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Deepika Bhadre, MUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khalid Hussein Bakheit Ahmed, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepika Bhadre, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Why Kenya Needs a Unified EMT Training System: A Call for Standardization in Emergency Medical Services

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, University of Mississipi Medical Center, USA.

(2) Prof. Maged Refaat, Ain Shams University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Qasim Abbas Khyoosh Al-Eqabi, Middle Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Brittany Fannie Turner, Colorado Technical University, United States.

(3) Vikash Gaur, Meerabai Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Agussalim, Makassar Health Polytechnic, Indonesia.

(2) Chidimma Lilian Okpalla, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Qasim Abbas Khyoosh Al-Eqabi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Brittany Fannie Turner, United States) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vikash Gaur, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Soil erosion-based sub-basin prioritization in an Intermittent River Basin Using Morphometric Analysis: A case study of Jirgo River Basin, Central India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Him Lal Shrestha, Kathmandu Forestry College, Nepal.

Reviewers:

(1) Ngoc Trinh Minh, VNU Hanoi Univeristy of Science, Vietnam.

(2) Kareem, Mariam Olamide, New Mexico State University, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ngoc Trinh Minh, Vietnam) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kareem, Mariam Olamide, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Awareness about Dietary Supplement Consumption among Student Population

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Hudson Nyambaka, Kenyatta University, Kenya.

Reviewers:

(1) Kibur Hunie Tesfa, University of Gondar, Ethiopia.

(2) Rajashri Kanad Gutte, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bargale Sushant Sukumar, Rajiv Gandhi university of health science, India.

(2) TIŢA Mihaela Adriana, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kibur Hunie Tesfa, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rajashri Kanad Gutte, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Awareness Towards Sustainable Development among Higher Secondary School Students in Odisha, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. E.Seda Koç, Namık Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Dilafruz Sarimsakova, Uzbekistan State World Languages University, Uzbekistan.

(2) Adewole Ayodele, Adeleke University, Nigeria.

(3) Jitendranath Gorai, Central University of Karnataka, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Yuniana Cahyaningrum, Indonesian Art Institute Surakarta, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Dilafruz Sarimsakova, Uzbekistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adewole Ayodele, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jitendranath Gorai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Inclusive Education in Practice in India: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of Classroom Implementation and Teacher Preparation

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) OKORO, Patience, Delta State University, Nigeria.

(2) Odeniyi Olujinmi Adebayo, National Open University Of Nigeria, NIGERIA.

(3) Keo Vireak, National University of Battambang , Cambodia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhrigu Raj Mourya, MATS Law School, MATS University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (OKORO, Patience, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Odeniyi Olujinmi Adebayo, NIGERIA) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Keo Vireak, Cambodia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Exploring the Learning Management System Features and its Impact on the Oral Communication Skills of First Year College Students

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Ramesh Chandra Aditya Komperla, USA.

(2) Indah Sari S.S, Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Indonesia.

(3) Sudhanshu Sekhar Tripathy, C.V Raman Global University Bhubaneswar Odisha, India.

(4) S. Latha Venkateswari, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed Hasan Al-ghanimi, University of Babylon, Iraq.

(2) Shahebaz Ahmed Khan, Jayaprakash Narayan Engineering College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ramesh Chandra Aditya Komperla, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Indah Sari S.S, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sudhanshu Sekhar Tripathy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (S. Latha Venkateswari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA