Peer Review History: Manifestation of Heterosis for Plant Architecture, Yield and Seed Parameters in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L. Moench) through Half Diallel Analysis

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Muqadas No, Hainan University, Pakistan.

(2) Ratna Dewi Eskundari, Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muqadas No, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ratna Dewi Eskundari, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Physical Water Quality Parameters of Borehole Water in Enugu State: A Comparative Analysis of Wet and Dry Seasons

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Richard Sawadogo, Research institute for health sciences Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Reviewers:

(1) Murugaragavan Ramasamy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(2) Prabha, Guru Nanak Dev University, India.

(3) Kundan Kumar, Assam University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amit Kumar Solank, J.P.University, India.

(2) BENRABAH Samia, Badji Mokhtar University, Algeria.

(3) Manoj H Mota, Annasaheb Dange College of Engineering and Technology, Affiliated to Shivaji University, India.

(4) Naris Dyah Prasetyawati, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Murugaragavan Ramasamy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Prabha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kundan Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Innovating Quality Evaluation in Swedish Dental Care: Development and Testing of a New Assessment Method

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Hanaa Said ELsayed Mousa, Zagazig, Egypt.

(2) Lakshmi Senkumar, ECU School of Dental Medicine, US.

(3) Lucrezia Parma-Benfenati, University of Michigan, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hanaa Said ELsayed Mousa, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Lakshmi Senkumar, US) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Lucrezia Parma-Benfenati, United States) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Distribution of Selected Occlusal Traits among a Sample of Sudanese Orthodontic Patients: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Moitri Ojha, SMBT Dental College & Hospital, India.

(2) Riyam Haleem, Al-Hadi University, Iraq.

(3) S.C.Ahila, SRM IST, India.

(4) Bhargavi Chinnamurthy, NTRUHS, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aarathi J Prakash, Malabar Dental College, India.

(2) G Vivek Reddy, Narayana Dental College & Hospital, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.625/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Moitri Ojha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Riyam Haleem, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S.C.Ahila, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Bhargavi Chinnamurthy, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hemoglobin Genotype Distribution Among Filipinos: A Historical Systematic Review (1958–2025)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Armel Hervé Nwabo Kamdje, University of Ngaoundere,Cameroon.

Reviewers:

(1) Noumi Mustapha, Algeria.

(2) Riyadh Saad Atshan Al-Khafaji, Al-Furat Al-Awsat University, Iraq.

(3) Hanan Mahmoud Abdel-Latif Fayed, Qena University , Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Noumi Mustapha, Algeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Riyadh Saad Atshan Al-Khafaji, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hanan Mahmoud Abdel-Latif Fayed, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Response of Maize (Zea mays L.) to Integrated Application of Potassium and Potassium Solubilizing Bacteria

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Niyan Jalal Qadir, Sulaimani Polytechnic University, Iraq.

(2) Abraham Isah, Open Forum on Agricultural Biotechnology in Africa, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nihad Abdul-Lateef Ali Kadhim, College of Agriculture, AL -Qasim Green University, Iraq.

(2) T H Shankarappa, College of Horticulture Bengaluru, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Niyan Jalal Qadir, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abraham Isah, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ethnomedicinal Knowledge and Phytochemical Screening of Saluyot (Corchorus olitorius L.) Leaf Extract Used by the Tigwahanon Tribe of San Fernando, Bukidnon, Philippines

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jean-Paul Ngbolua Koto-Te-Nyiwa, University of Kinshasa, Congo DR.

Reviewers:

(1) Divya Gupta, Sanskriti University, India.

(2) Zakaria Ahmed, Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Bangladesh.

(3) Vaibhav Dagaji Aher, Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Chinasa Godsgift Eni, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Divya Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zakaria Ahmed, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Vaibhav Dagaji Aher, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Phenological and Agro-morphological Characterization of Sorghum in the southeast region of Niger

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farjana Sultana, IUBAT – International University of Business Agriculture and Technology, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Stroe Traian Ciprian, University Ovidius of Constanta, Romania.

(2) Rakesh Kumar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anita Sharma, Agriculture University, India.

(2) Kotb Amer Farghali Omran, Egypt.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Stroe Traian Ciprian, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Rakesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Does Cost of Debt Condition the Debt–Value Nexus? Quantile Regression Evidence from Nigerian Manufacturing Firms

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ayoub Azzayani, Mohammed V University, Morocco.

Reviewers:

(1) Md Jaber Al Islam, University of Asia Pacific, Bangladesh.

(2) Shivakumar, Visvesvaraya Technological University, India.

(3) Ozondu Mary Eberechukwu, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Jyoti Prakash Rath, BJB Autonomous College, India.

(2) Mirza Muhammad Ali Baig, University of Education, Lahore, Pakistan.

(3) Nidhi Mittal, Ireava, India.

(4) TITEI, Adina, Ovidius University of Constanta, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md Jaber Al Islam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shivakumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ozondu Mary Eberechukwu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Lipswitch Vestibuloplasty Using the ‘Lock & Glide’ Technique: A Case Report

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Giuseppe Murdaca, University of Genoa, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Safdar Baig, Bahawal Victoria Hospital & Quaid-e-Azam Medical College, Pakistan.

(2) Jananni Muthu, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Deepashri H Kambalimath, College of Dental Sciences, India.

(2) Shameela Khadeeja A, Pms College of Dental Science And Research, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.3/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Safdar Baig, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Jananni Muthu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA