Peer Review History: Effect of Fertility Levels and Bio formulations on Growth, Yield and Quality of Clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research , India.

Reviewers:

(1) Prajwol Rijal, Tribhuvan University, Nepal.

(2) Tadesse Moges Mulatu, Debre Berhan University, Ethiopia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) A K Jaiswal, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.

(2) A.Balamurugan, The American College, Madurai Kamaraj University, India.

(3) Aqeel Johni Nassir, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(4) Garba Hani danladi, Abdullahi Fodio University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(5) Kibret Abebe Teshome, Mekdela Amba University, Ethiopia.

(6) Wahidin Teguh Sasongko, National Research and Innovation Agency, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Prajwol Rijal, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tadesse Moges Mulatu, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Understanding Climate-Driven Livestock Diversification: Evidence from Semi-Arid Regions of Rajasthan

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Isidro Alberto Pérez Bartolomé, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Jaiky Verma, Mahatma Gandhi Chitrkoot Gramodaya Vishwavidhyalya, India.

(2) Pooja Krishna J, Joy University, India.

(3) Murali Matcha, National Institute of Technology Warangal, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jaiky Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pooja Krishna J, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Murali Matcha, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Reviewing Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Renewable Energy Production

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Isidro Alberto Pérez Bartolomé,  University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Omprakash Sahu, Sambalpur University, India.

(2) Saaransh Choudhary, Rajasthan Technical University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Arkar Htet, Mullion Façade Engineering School, Myanmar.

(2) Emile St-Pierre, Osaka University, Japan.

(3) Pradipta Mukhopadhyay, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Omprakash Sahu, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saaransh Choudhary, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Synthesis, Antifungal Evaluation, and Structure–activity Relationship of Chlorinated Imidazopyridinyl- phenylpropenone Derivatives against Aspergillus fumigatus

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Thomas P. West, Texas A&M University-Commerce, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Alaa Akeel Alhosaene, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Nita Indriyani, Universitas Pendidikan Muhammadiyah Sorong, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mojtaba Ghorbani Asiabar, Payam Noor University, Islamic Republic of Iran.

(2) Sonawane Bhimraj Natha, MES’S Arts Commerce and Science College, India.

(3) Stephen  Muhindi, USDA-ARS, United State.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alaa Akeel Alhosaene, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Nita Indriyani, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Communication self-efficacy and emotional intelligence among staff Nurses

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Malar Kodi S., All India Institutes of Medical Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Siddaram Sarate, CVM Nursing College, CVM University, India.

(2) Yatin Talwar, India.

(3) Mehwish Ateeq, Saudi Arabia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Alhassan Fouard Kanu, Graham International University, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Siddaram Sarate, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Yatin Talwar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mehwish Ateeq, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: New Distribution of Two Cobweb (Araneae: Theridiidae Sundevall, 1833) Spiders in Chhattisgarh State, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ibrahim O. Farah, Jackson State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Lucas Pessanha Mousinho, Universidade de Brasília, Brazil.

(2) Hind Ibrahim Ali Al-khazraji, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(3) Iman Mussa Omran, University of Basrah, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lucas Pessanha Mousinho, Brazil) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hind Ibrahim Ali Al-khazraji, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Iman Mussa Omran, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Recent Advancements in Drone-Based Remote Sensing for Precision Agriculture: A Mini-Review of Applications, Challenges, and Opportunities

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Amit Biswas , Haldia Institute of Technology , India.

(2) Vinay Sampatrao Mandlik, Shivaji University Kolhapur, India.

(3) Omkar Gupta, College of Agricultural Engineering & Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Babasaheb Dnyandeo Patil, Bharati Vidyapeeth BVDU Pune, Institute of Management IMRDA, India.

(2) Md Nazmul Islam, Northwest A&F University, China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Amit Biswas , India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Vinay Sampatrao Mandlik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Omkar Gupta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Identification of Stable and Rust-Resistant Bread Wheat Genotypes through Multi-Environment Trial Analysis in Ethiopia

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, Karnataka, India.

(2) Dr. Lucia Bortolini, University of Padova, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Ghassen Abid, Centre of Biotechnology of Borj-Cedria (CBBC), Tunisia.

(2) N Sabitha, ANGRAU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ismarley Lage  Horta Morais, Federal University of Uberlândia, Brazil.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ghassen Abid, Tunisia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (N Sabitha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Agronomic Response of Tomato Varieties TOUNVI and COBRA to Organic, Mineral and Integrated Soil Fertility Management in Southern Benin

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Farjana Sultana, IUBAT – International University of Business Agriculture and Technology, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Khodanitska Olena, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi State Pedagogical University, Ukraine.

(2) C. Indu Rani, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Mayur Arun Dongre, SSVPSLK Dr PRG Science college, affiliated with KBCNMU University, India.

(2) Muhammad Ammar Amjad, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(3) Nada Hussein Al-Amer, Al-Furat Universitym College of Agricultural Engineering, Syria.

(4) Sheeba Menon, K K Shah Jarodwala Maninagar Science college, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Khodanitska Olena, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (C. Indu Rani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Correlation between Auditory Brainstem Responses and Auditory Steady-State Responses in Patients with Hearing Loss: A Retrospective Comparative Study

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ravi Kumar Chittoria, JIPMER, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Ambika Bose, Maa Institute of Speech and Hearing, India.

(2) Amit Gupta, Dr. B R Ambedkar University, India.

(3) Kirolos Eskandar, Helwan University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Bhavana Purushottam Khobragade, RDIK and KD College Badnera Amravati, India.

(2) Neelesh Benet, Amity University Haryana, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ambika Bose, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amit Gupta, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Kirolos Eskandar, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA