Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Netsanet Bibisso Doda, Wolaita Sodo University, Ethiopia.

(2) Adigun Aminat Omotoyosi, Obafemi Awolowo University, Nigeria.

(3) Eliana Mariela Werbin, National University of Cordoba, Argentina.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dhahir Habib Bahedh, National Center for Occupational Health and Safety, Iraq.

(2) Gilbert Rely, Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya University, Indonesia.

(3) Nathan Oluchukwu, National Open University of Nigeria, Nigeria.

(4) Ni Nyoman Ayu Suryandari, Universitas Mahasarawasti Denpasar, Indonesia.

(5) Sabeha Barzan Farhod, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(6) Sams Uddin Ahmed, Brac University, Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Netsanet Bibisso Doda, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Adigun Aminat Omotoyosi, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Eliana Mariela Werbin, Argentina) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Halid Hasan, State Polytechnic of Malang, Indonesia.

(2) R.A.D. D. Weeratunge, Sri Lanka.

(3) Murugesan D, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ogunkanmì,Adewuni Taudeen., Ekiti State University, Ansar Udeen College of Education, Nigeria.

(2) ADEWALE Abass Adekunle, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Nigeria.

(3) K.Majini Jes Bella, Vels Institute of Science, Technology And Advanced Science, India.

(4) Sugin Raj M, Kristu Jayanti (Deemed to be) University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Halid Hasan, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (R.A.D. D. Weeratunge, Sri Lanka) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Murugesan D, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. José Francisco de Sales Chagas, Sao Leopoldo Mandic Medical School, Brasil.

Reviewers:

(1) Ariel de Jesús Martínez Oñate, Hospital Ángeles del Pedregal, Mexico.

(2) Ali Abbas Hashim Almusawi, Hammurabi College of Medicin, Iraq.

(3) Hrvoje Budincevic, Sveti Duh University Hospital, Croatia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kajal Patel, IKDRC &ITS, GUTS, India.

(2) Lorenzo Martini D’Agostino di Ser Jacopo, University of Sienna, Italy.

(3) Nezih Oktar, Ege University, Turkey.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ariel de Jesús Martínez Oñate, Mexico) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ali Abbas Hashim Almusawi, Iraq) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hrvoje Budincevic, Croatia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised MS v3 and Feedback v3 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Emeritus Ahmed Medhat Mohamed Al-Naggar, Cairo University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Debkanta Ghosh, Vidyasagar College for Women, India.

(2) S. Balamurugan, Bharathidasan University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Valentina Cumbo, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sicilia, Italy.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Debkanta Ghosh, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S. Balamurugan, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Essam Fathy Mohamed El-Hashash, Al-Azhar University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Sribas Patra, Niranjan Govt. Women’s College, India.

(2)T.Lakshmibai, Sri Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi ViswaMahaVidyalaya, India.

(3)Mohammed Hezam Al-Mashreki,,Renewable Natural Resources Research Center , Yemen.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sribas Patra, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (T.Lakshmibai, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohammed Hezam Al-Mashreki, Yemen) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

(2) Dr. Bishun Deo Prasad, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Goutam Mahata, India.

(2) Reda E. Essa, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Borozan Aurica, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Romania.

(2) Joydeb Gomasta, Gazipur Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(3) Koyel Dey, Horticulture College, Birsa Agricultural University, India.

(4) S.Mohandas, Agrl. College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agrl. University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Goutam Mahata, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Reda E. Essa, Egypt) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Sofia Pedrosa Gomes dos Santos, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal.

(2) Dr. Pescaru Maria, Pitești University Center, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Emad Ghassab Ababneh, NCHRD, Jordan.

(2) Gonul Altay, Ege University, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ahmad Syafii, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

(2) Kalpana T M, Indian Statistical Institute –  Chennai Centre, India.

(3) Sumardin Raupu, Universitas Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Emad Ghassab Ababneh, Jordan) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gonul ALTAY, Turkiye) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Francisco Welington de Sousa Lima, Brazil Minister Petrônio Portella University Campus, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Chandra Shikhi Kodete, Eastern Illinois University, USA.

(2) Amir Reza Hashemi, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

(3) Jiangke Wu, Northern Arizona University, United States.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Muktevi Srivenkatesh, GITAM Deemed to be University, India.

(2) Rohit Kumar Singh, Moradabad Institute Of Technology, India.

(3) Tanishka Hira, Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Chandra Shikhi Kodete, USA) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amir Reza Hashemi, Iran) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jiangke Wu, United States) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

(2) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Jithin Scaria, Nilgiri College of Arts and Science, India.

(2) Chiam C C, Open University Malaysia Selangor, Malaysia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khaleel Radhi Hasan Alzlzly, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Iraq.

(2) Rozhan Bin Abu Dardak, Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI), Malaysia.

(3) Yuli Purbaningsih, Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, Indonesia.

(4) Syed  Damsaz Ali Andrabi, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jithin Scaria, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Chiam C C, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA

Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Ram Kumar, India.

(2) Bijivemula Reddy Lakshmi, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, India.

(3) A. Nithish, SKLTGHU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Daniel Abebe, Jinka, Ethiopia.

(2) Iman Mussa Omran, College of Science, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(3) Sanjai Kumar Gupta, VBS Government Post Graduate College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:

Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ram Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Bijivemula Reddy Lakshmi, India) | File 1 | File 2

Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (A. Nithish, India) | File 1 | NA

Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2

Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA