Peer Review History: DEVELOPMENT AND QUALITY EVALUATION OF NUTRIENT ENRICHED BREAD FROM WHEAT, SOYBEAN, AND CARROT FLOUR BLENDS

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ricardo Stefani, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Ofoedum, Arinze Francis, Federal University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Asif Irshad, Wing of Colleges, Higher & Technical Education, Govt. Polytechnic Institute, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ofoedum, Arinze Francis, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Asif Irshad, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Economic and Environmental Benefits of Green Cultivation

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Mustafa Turkmen, Giresun University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Subhash Sinha, Swami Vivekananda College, Assam, India.

(2) Mufaro Andrew Matandare, BA ISAGO University, Botswana.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ayalew Muluye Melsew, Begimeder college of Teachers Education, Ethiopia.

(2) Basirou Dembele, Université Nazi Boni , Burkina Faso.

(3) Govinda Bahadur K.C, Nepal.

(4) Syed Aasif Hussain Andrabi, Glocal University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Subhash Sinha, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Mufaro Andrew Matandare, Botswana) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Impact of Intellectual Capital in Enhancing Corporate Performance: Evidence from Public Companies in MENA

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Olexandr Yemelyanov, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Ukraine.

Reviewers:

(1) Wilson Muema, Kenya Methodist University, Kenya.

(2) Muhammad Ahmad, Malaysia.

(3) Novera Nahar Bhuiyan, Bangladesh.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hemanta Kumar Bhadra, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh.

(2) Pallavi Padhy, MS Ramaiah College of Arts, Science and Commerce, India.

(3) Rishabh Gupta, University of Delhi, India.

(4) Yeoh Wee Win, INTI International College Penang, Malaysia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Wilson Muema, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Muhammad Ahmad, Malaysia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Novera Nahar Bhuiyan, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Peer Review History: The Effect of Macroeconomic Uncertainty on Bank Credit Allocation in Indonesia

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Sulaiman Ebrahim Kunju, Mahatma Gandhi University, India.

(2) Heri Sasono, Indonesia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dileep Kumar Ghattamaneni, USA.

(2) Narasimha Rao Boinapalli, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Sulaiman Ebrahim Kunju, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Heri Sasono, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessment of Training Needs for Pangas Fish Farmers in Disease Management: A Study in Selected Areas of Trishal Upazila, Mymensingh District, Bangladesh

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Md.Shajahan Kabir, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Kieu Thi Huyen, Vietnam.

(2) Gagan Singh Guru, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Punit Saraswat, Lachoo Memorial College Of Science And Technology (Autonomous), India.

(2) Katia Alcione Kopp, Federal University of Goiá, Brazil.

(3) Sanee Chauhan, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kieu Thi Huyen, Vietnam) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Gagan Singh Guru, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Maize Production in Telangana, India: What’s Holding Back Productivity?

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Pompy Malakar, Assam Agricultural University, India.

(2) Dilip Kumar Darjee, Indira Gandhi National Open University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) P.Govindan, K.S.Rangasamy College of Arts and Science (Autonomous), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pompy Malakar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Dilip Kumar Darjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Microbial Diversity in the Active Slurries and Digestates of selected untreated and alkali-pretreated lignocellulose substrates for biogas production

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Irena Malinowska, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Poland.

Reviewers:

(1) Ademola Oyejide ADEBAYO, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Fakir Mohan Sahu, Navsari Agricultural University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Massreshaw Assnakew Abebe, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ademola Oyejide ADEBAYO, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fakir Mohan Sahu, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Optimizing Sowing Windows and Irrigation Schedules to Enhance Growth and Productivity of Potato Crop

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. P. Valarmathi, ICAR- Central Institute for Cotton Research, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Vineet Dheer, Career Point University, India.

(2) Aloke Verma, Kalinga University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vineet Dheer, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Aloke Verma, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of Bacterial contamination in drinking water at White Nile State, Sudan during 2022-2023

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Jeremiah Agada, Federal University of Health Sciences Otukpo, Nigeria.

(2) Flyndon Mark S. Dagalea, University of Eastern Philippines, Philippines.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prasenjit Mali, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jeremiah Agada, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Flyndon Mark S. Dagalea, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Therapeutic Potential of the Silkworm (Bombyx mori L.): A Biomedical Perspective

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ahmed Mohammed Abu-Dief Mohammed, Sohag University, Egypt, Taibah University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) D. Sravani, Aditya University, India.

(2) Arjun Patra, P. K. College, India.

(3) Manish Kumar Vijay, ICFRE-Tropical Forest Research institute, India.

(4) Muhammad Miandad, University of Gujrat, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Aditya, Dr. Y.S. Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, College of Horticulture and Forestry, India.

(2) Aimen Khalid , Institute of Microbiology, Government College University Faisalabad,  Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (D. Sravani, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arjun Patra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Manish Kumar Vijay, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Muhammad Miandad, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA