Peer Review History: A Quantitative Study on Sociolinguistic Competence: English Language Communication among Senior High School Students

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Suleyman Goksoy, University of Duzce, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Gentjana Taraj, “Aleksander Moisiu” University, Albania.

(2) Tsitsi Roselene Gonzo, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe.

(3) Aqsa Sarwar, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

(4) Abana, Chinenye Onyinyechkwu Helen, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anupreeta Chatterjee, IGNOU, India.

(2) Kritika, Patna University Patna, India.

(3) Senthilkumar Arumugam Subramanian, TN Dr.MGR University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Gentjana Taraj, Albania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tsitsi Roselene Gonzo, Zimbabwe) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Aqsa Sarwar, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Abana, Chinenye Onyinyechkwu Helen, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Improving Undergraduate English Writing through Metacognitive Strategy-based Instruction: Implications for Self-regulated Learning

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Lee Bih Ni, University of Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.

(2) Realito Adamugy Ussene Momade, Lurio University, Mozambique.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dammar Singh Saud, Far Western University, Nepal.

(2) Diego da Silva, UniEnsino, Brasil.

(3) Sonal Chabra, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lee Bih Ni, Malaysia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Realito Adamugy Ussene Momade, Mozambique) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Online Learning and Educational Outcomes in Zambia: Perspectives from Selected Learning Institutions

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. (Dr.) Rajendra Parsad Gunputh, The University of Mauritius, Mauritius.

Reviewers:

(1) Deepti Jain, Rani Durgawati University Jabalpur, India.

(2) Ilyass El Yahyaoui, Morocco.

(3) Sevcan Bayraktar Çepni, Trabzon University, Turkiye.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Habtamu Debasu Belay, Bonga University, Ethiopia.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deepti Jain, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ilyass El Yahyaoui, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sevcan Bayraktar Çepni, Turkiye) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Theoretical Conceptual Framework Model of Service Innovation in Improving Academic Quality at Gorontalo Private Universities

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Meryem ALTUN EKİZ, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Turkey.

Reviewers:

(1) Lok Raj Sharma, Makawanpur Multiple Campus, Nepal.

(2) ROHAN SINGH, CHANDIGARH UNIVERSITY, INDIA.

(3) Safia Iqbal Wattoo, University of Management and Technology, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Oumaima Hali, National School of Commerce and Management, ENCG Casablanca, – Hassan II University, Morocco.

(2) Pinki Rani Dei, Berhampur University, government science college chatrapur ganjam, india.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lok Raj Sharma, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (ROHAN SINGH, INDIA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Safia Iqbal Wattoo, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Closed Reduction of a Pediatric Le Fort I Fracture: A Case Report on Minimally Invasive Management

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Ashish Anand, William Carey School of Osteopathic Medicine, And University of Mississippi Medical Center, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Ahmed A. El Danaf, General Organization of Teaching Hospitals and Institutes (GOTHI), Egypt.

(2) Pritha Sarkar, India.

(3) Natashekara Mallesh, Nirwan University Jaipur, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Abu-Hussein Muhamad, Greece.

(2) Narmadha Chandran, Adhiparasakthi dental college and hospital, Tamilnadu Dr MGR medical university, India.

(3) Pritha Sarkar, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.83/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ahmed A. El Danaf, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pritha Sarkar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Natashekara Mallesh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: What Echo Could Not See: Silent Apical HCM Revealed by MRI in a Competitive Athlete

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sam Said, Hospital Group Twente, The Netherlands.

Reviewers:

(1) I Ketut Alit Utamayasa, Airlangga University, Indonesia.

(2) Samuel Joseph, Njala University – Bo Campus, Republic of Sierra Leone.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (I Ketut Alit Utamayasa, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Samuel Joseph, Republic of Sierra Leone) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: AI-driven Green Logistics: Optimizing Last-mile Delivery Networks with Electric Vehicles for Carbon Neutrality in U.S. Metropolitan Areas

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Deus N. Shatta, National Institute of Transport, Tanzania.

(2) Anshi Jindal, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies (MRIIRS), India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ceren Gül Artuner Özder, İstanbul Beykent University, Türkiye.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Deus N. Shatta, Tanzania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anshi Jindal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effect of Different Weed Management Practices on Growth, Yield and Quality of Black Gram (Vigna mungo L.) under Irrigated Condition

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. M. Yuvaraj, Agricultural College and Research Institute, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Lolimo Festus Napokol, University of Eldoret, Kenya.

(2) Debosmita Sikdar, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, India.

(3) Osunleti, Samuel Oluwaseun, Edo State College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5+8+8+6=30.5/4=7.625

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lolimo Festus Napokol, Kenya) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Debosmita Sikdar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Osunleti, Samuel Oluwaseun, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Motivation and Coping Mechanisms of Female Students in Automotive Technology: A Case Study in Northern Philippines

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Ruth G. Luciano, Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology, Philippines.

(2) Thanduxolo Albert Nomtshongwana, Walter Sisulu University, South Africa.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) S. C. Sooriarachchi, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ruth G. Luciano, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Thanduxolo Albert Nomtshongwana, South Africa) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Water Harvesting and Utilization in the Earth–atmosphere–biological System: From Natural Processes to Technological Innovations

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Xiao-Feng Sun, Northwestern Polytechnical University, China.

Reviewers:

(1) Abhishek Malav, Agriculture University, Kota, India.

(2) A.Valliammai, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, India.

(3) Sanjeev Kumar, Graphic Era (Deemed to be) University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Yuer Yang, The University of Hong Kong, China.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Abhishek Malav, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (A.Valliammai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sanjeev Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v2 | File 1 | NA