Peer Review History: Enhancing Natural Dye Affinity on Wool through Optimized ZnO Nanoparticle Mordanting

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Yong X. Gan, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Laxman Ramji Rathod, University of Mumbai, India.

(2) Amer Neamah Jarad Al-Daghman, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(3) Ashok Chinthakuntla, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anas Muslim, Al-Qasim Green University, Iraq.

(2) Iqra Rafiq, SKUAST-K, India.

(3) Neeta, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, India.

(4) R.M.Y.D.Rathnayaka, Wayamba University, Sri Lanka.

(5) Shahid Adeel, Govt. College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Laxman Ramji Rathod, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Amer Neamah Jarad Al-Daghman, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ashok Chinthakuntla, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evaluation of the Cytotoxic Effect of Chlorhexidine on the Healing Process of Oral Surgeries: An Integrative Literature Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Sung-Kun Kim, Northeastern State University, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Reza Eddin Owfi, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Iran.

(2) Charu Saxena, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, India.

(3) Amr M.K. Mahrous, El Saleheya El Gadida University, Egypt.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rohini Mishra, IIMT University, India.

(2) Samira Malekzade Shiravani, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.66/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Reza Eddin Owfi, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Charu Saxena, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Amr M.K. Mahrous, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Enhancing Shelf Life and Quality of Assam Lemon Using Carboxy Methyl Cellulose Edible Coatings

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Bindoo Malviya, Teerthanker Mahaveer University, India.

(2) Tauqeer Ahmad, Pakistan.

(3) Lekshmi.R.S, St.Joseph’s College of Engineering, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Dorna abdolkhani, Iran.

(2) Tobi Olasope, Nigerian Stored Products Research Institute, Nigeria.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bindoo Malviya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tauqeer Ahmad, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Lekshmi.R.S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Evolution of India’s Sugar Industry: Policy Reforms and Committee Interventions from 1932 to 2025

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Lawin Laifoya Moise, Applied Anthropology Research Group, Republic of Benin.

(2) S M Qasim, Institute of Engineering and Technology, Lucknow, India.

(3) Miroljub Hadzic, Singidunum University, Serbia.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Babasaheb Jadhav, Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth, India.

(2) Mihnea Toncescu, Romania.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Lawin Laifoya Moise, Republic of Benin) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (S M Qasim, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Miroljub Hadzic, Serbia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Soil Microbiome Engineering in Sustainable Agriculture: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Pankaj Kumar, Dolphin (PG) Institute of Biomedical and Natural Sciences, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Thiyagarajan Santhanamari, Onaizah Colleges University, Saudi Arabia.

(2) Moatar Maria Mihaela, University of Life Sciences “King Michael I” from Timișoara, Romania.

(3) Mohammed Chennaoui, Morocco.

(4) Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, Universidad Veracruzana, Mexico.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ida Nursanti, University of Batanghari, Indonesia.

(2) Mohammed CHENNAOUI, Morocco.

(3) Tammam Kheder Yaghi, Bucharest University, Netherlands.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Thiyagarajan Santhanamari, Saudi Arabia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Moatar Maria Mihaela, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Mohammed Chennaoui, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Jorge Octavio Virues Delgadillo, Mexico) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Chromatographic profiling and assessment of in vitro anti-diabetic potential of Chromolaena odorata (L.) R.M. King and H. Robinson

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Vinayaka K.S, Sri Venkataramana Swamy College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Rafi Syed, Sri Harshini College of Engineering and Technology for Womens, India.

(2) Sreya Dutta, Central Ayurveda Research Institute, Kolkata, India.

(3) SAKIRIGUI Amoussatou, University of Technical Sciences, Engineering and Mathematics (UNSTIM), Benin.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Nikita N. Kanbarkar, Rani Chennamma College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Priyanka Verma, Regional Research Institute of Unani Medicine, New Delhi, India.

(3) Shah Mili Sandeepbhai, India.

(4) Shweta Chand, Christ Church College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.33/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rafi Syed, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sreya Dutta, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (SAKIRIGUI Amoussatou, Benin) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Alignment of Communicative Language Teaching Approach with Teaching Activities in Zanzibar EFL Secondary School Classrooms: Theory Versus Practice

Editor(s):

(1) Prof.  Dennis Gamad Caballes, De La Salle-College of Saint Benilde, Philippines.

Reviewers:

(1) Rogell Kim M. Ticar, Philippines.

(2) KOTTIN Assogba Evariste, University of Abomey, Benin.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Hom Raj Khadka, Gysansagar Secondary School /Banke Bageshowryh Campus Nepalgunj, Nepal.

(2) Sukris Sutiyatno, Universitas Ma’arif Nahdlatul Ulama Kebumen (UMNU-Kebumen), Indonesia.

(3) Thanakit Ouanhlee, California Intercontinental University, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rogell Kim M. Ticar, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (KOTTIN Assogba Evariste, Benin) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Characterization of Locust Bean Seed Hull Extract (Gum) as a Bio-Binder for Natural Fiber Composites in Automotive Applications

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Guang Yih Sheu, Chang-Jung Christian University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Errili Miloud, Mohammed V University, Morocco.

(2) Maria Antony Sebastin Vimalan P, Anna University Chennai, India.

(3) Belete Balta Bassa, Gujarat Technological University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kedir Derbie, Wollo University, Kombolcha Institute of Technology, Ethiopia.

(2) Sourav Debnath, Brainware University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Errili Miloud, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Maria Antony Sebastin Vimalan P, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Belete Balta Bassa, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Effects of Growth Enhancers on the Germination and Seedling Vigor of Sweet Corn (Zea mays l. var. Saccharata)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Bilal Ahmad wani, Govt. Degree College Anantnag, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Anil Pokhrel, Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Nepal.

(2) Arti Manohar Ambhore, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Anil Pokhrel, Nepal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Arti Manohar Ambhore, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Filtration Approach Of An Optimized Extract Of Garcinia Kola Heckel By Membrane Separative Techniques

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Himanshu Singh, Babu Sundr Singh College of Pharmacy Lucknow, India.

(2) Narasimha Naik, Dattakala Institute of Pharmaceutical Science & Research, India.

(3) Keshamma E, Maharani Cluster University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.6/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Himanshu Singh, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Narasimha Naik, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Keshamma E, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA