Peer Review History: Dynamic Weed Control through Targeted Herbicide in Transplanted Black Rice (Oryza sativa L.) under Eastern Uttar Pradesh, India

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Marco Trevisan, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Jince Mary M Joy, Kerala Agricultural University, India.

(2) Anjum Naeem, University of Agriculture, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Anil Kumar Kori, JNKVV, India.

(2) Farrokh Ghahremaninejad, Kharazmi University, Iran.

(3) Abdus Salam, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

(4) Purshotam Singh, SKUAST-Kashmir, India.

(5) Samie Yaseen Sharaf Zeebaree , College of Health and Medical Technology Shekhan, Duhok Polytechnic University, Iraq.

(6) Sepideh Hatami, Iran.

(7) Vineet Dheer, School of Agricultural Sciences, Career Point University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Jince Mary M Joy, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anjum Naeem, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Biofertilizers: A Sustainable Solution for Enhanced Crop Yield and Soil Health in Modern Agriculture

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Binayak Chakraborty, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Disha Agarwal, G B Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, India.

(2) Sarita R. Sharma,Indus University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Y.Kavya, Dr.YSR Horticultural University, India.

(2) Binod Kumar Choudhary, Arka Jain University, India.

(3) Domga Richard, University of Ngaoundere, Cameroon.

(4) Phindile Madikizela, Institute for Water Research, Rhodes University, South Africa.

(5) Sreeja Bopin, Kadi Sarva Vishwavidyalaya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Disha Agarwal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sarita R. Sharma, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Ertapenem-Induced Encephalopathy: A Case Report Highlighting Carbapenem-Associated Neurotoxicity

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jurij Janež, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Reviewers:

(1) Paulo Sérgio Martins Fernandes, Portugal.

(2) B Raja Narender, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Boudhayan Bhattacharjee, The West Bengal University of Health Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.25/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Paulo Sérgio Martins Fernandes, Portugal) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (B Raja Narender, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Emerging technologies in grape juice production: advances, challenges, and sustainability perspectives

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chen Chin Chang, Tainan University of Technology, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Marija Zheplinska, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine.

(2) Benedict Nnamdi Ugwu, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Nigeria.

(3) Jubershaha S. Fakir, SPPU, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Amiza Binti Mat Amin, Universiti Malaysia, Malaysia.

(2) Eman  Moustafa  El-Sayed, National  Research  Centre,  Egypt.

(3) Mathew Jun Pego Mariani, Kalinga State University, Philippines.

(4) Mingwan Zhang, China.

(5) Yeole Ashok Kisan, M.V.P’s S.V.K.T. Arts, Science and Commerce College, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Marija Zheplinska, Ukraine) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Benedict Nnamdi Ugwu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Jubershaha S. Fakir, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia TAPP Repair with Peritoneal Closure Using Tackers

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Wagih Mommtaz Ghannam, Mansoura University, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Carlos Santiago Ruggeri, Argentina.

(2) Deepak Sethi, Rabindra Nath Tagore Medical College, India.

(3) B. N. Mishra, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) M.Subrahmanyam, Maharashtra University of health sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.96/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Carlos Santiago Ruggeri, Argentina) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Deepak Sethi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (B. N. Mishra, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Etiology of Renal Allograft Dysfunction: a Single Center-based Study

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Darko Nozic, General hospital Acibadem Belmedic Belgrade, Serbia.

Reviewers:

(1) Alok Kumar, National Institute of Ayurveda, India.

(2) Fousiya Yoonus, Government Medical College, Kottayam, Kerala, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Khin Phyu Pyar, Defense Services Medical Academy, Myanmar.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alok Kumar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Fousiya Yoonus, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrating AI-Based Therapeutic Design and Cloud Cybersecurity for Rare Genetic Diseases: A Systematic Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Leo Willyanto Santoso, Petra Christian University, Indonesia.

Reviewers:

(1) Farhang Salehim, APH Rosha, Iran.

(2) Md Mahadi Hasan, Washington University of Science and Technology, USA.

(3) Parankush Koul, Illinois Institute of Technology, United States of America.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.94/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Farhang Salehim, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Md Mahadi Hasan, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Parankush Koul, United States of America) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: QSAR-based Design of Schiff Base Inhibitors for Drug-resistant Salmonella typhi

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Pradip K Bhowmik, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA.

Reviewers:

(1) Nabeel Abed Abed Al Radha, Iraq.

(2) Priyanka Tiwari, KLE College of Pharmacy, Bengaluru-560010, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, India.

(3) Darakhshan Gazala Bari, Vivek University Bijnor (UP), India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Nabeel Abed Abed Al zadha, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Priyanka Tiwari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Darakhshan Gazala Bari, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: From Forests to Markets: Transformation of Traditional Livelihoods among Dongria Kandha in Rayagada District, Odisha, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Der-Jang Chi, Chinese Culture University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Manisha Singhai, India.

(2) Wilhelmina Jerome Lyimo, Tanzania.

(3) Sarvesh Kumar, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Manisha Singhai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Wilhelmina Jerome Lyimo, Tanzania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Sarvesh Kumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Re-Review report_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: India’s Work Life Imbalance: A Comparative Analysis with New Zealand and Pathways for Sustainable Work Culture

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Trivedi Krupa Udaykumar, Shri Gosar Hansraj Gosrani Commerce and Shri D D Nagda BBA College, India.

(2) Ahmad Fathulla Ahmad, Erbil Polytechnic University – Erbil College of Technical Management, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Trivedi Krupa Udaykumar, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ahmad Fathulla Ahmad, Iraq) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA