Peer Review History: Storytelling Marketing and Cross-Cultural Branding of Fuliang Tea: A Systematic Review and Global Evidence Synthesis

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Chun-Chien Kuo, National Taipei University of Business, Taiwan.

(2) Dr. Fang Xiang, University of International and Business Economics, China.

(3) Dr. Rakesh Verma, IIMT College of Engineering, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Kaushikkumar Patel, USA.

(2) Khalid Joya, Kiel University, Germany.

(3) Anshi Jindal, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies (MRIIRS), India.

(4) M Saravanan, PSG College of Arts & Science, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Adewale Abidemi AREMU, Federal University of Technology Akure, Nigeria.

(2) Enrico Moch, GrandEdu Research School, Germany.

(3) Iman Farhadian Dehkordi, Iran.

(4) Srivallil J, Aditya University, India.

(5) T. Nikil Prakash, St. Joseph’s College (Autonomous), India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.4/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Kaushikkumar Patel, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Khalid Joya, Germany) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Anshi Jindal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (M Saravanan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_3_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Using a Standard Gastroscope and Simple Accessories in a Resource-Limited Setting: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ramesh Gurunathan, Cengild GI Medical Centre and Sunway Medical Center, Malaysia.

Reviewers:

(1) Maliha Muzaffer, Mesco College of Pharmacy, India.

(2) Liviu Dubei, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.75/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Maliha Muzaffer, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Liviu Dubei, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Assessing and Prioritising Constraints of Small Tea Growers: Evidence from Idukki and Wayanad Districts in Kerala, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Afroz Alam, Banasthali Vidyapith, India.

Reviewers:

(1) N Chinglen Meitei, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalay, India.

(2) Saeid Shiukhy Soqanloo, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University (SANRU), Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (N Chinglen Meitei, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Saeid Shiukhy Soqanloo, Iran) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: The Effects of Starvation- Induced Stress with G. kola Extracts and Ketogenic Diet on Some Oxidative Stress Markers in Male Wistar Rats

Editor(s):

(1) Dr.Prasong Srihanam, Mahasarakham University,Thailand.

Reviewers:

(1) Ashrut Singhal, S.S Jain Subodh Jain College, India .

(2) Sarmishtha Chatterjee, India.

(3) Ashraf Saddik Alias, University of Mosul, Iraq.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Ashrut Singhal, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sarmishtha Chatterjee, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Ashraf Saddik Alias, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Sustainable Agronomic Innovations for Enhancing Soil Health and Crop Productivity: A Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Fatemeh Nejatzadeh, Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Reviewers:

(1) Muhammad Arslan Khalil, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan.

(2) Zaid Ahmad Babanlungu, Federal University of Technology Owerri, Nigeria.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Rupika Chopra, Kanya Maha Vidyalaya, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.7/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Muhammad Arslan Khalil, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Zaid Ahmad Babanlungu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrating Biofertilizers in Nutrient Management of Millets: A Review of Advances and Prospects

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Dr. Mohamed Abdel-Raheem, National Research Centre, Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Shailesh Kumar Dewangan, Shri Sai Baba Aadarsh Mahavidyalaya, India.

(2) Oladunni A Akinpelu, Nigeria.

(3) Hamid Zargari, Iran.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prashant Shrivastava, Jawaharlal Nehru Agriculture University, India.

(2) Avinash Pratap Singh, CMP Degree College, University Of Allahabad, India.

(3) Marwan Noori Ramadhan, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah, Iraq.

(4) Trilok Nath Rai, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Shailesh Kumar Dewangan,  India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Oladunni A Akinpelu, Nigeria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hamid Zargari, Iran) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Plant growth-promoting potentials of mycoendophytes associated with medicinal herb Argemone mexicana L.

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Simone Aquino, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Brazil.

Reviewers:

(1) Debebe Landina Lata, Wolkite University, Ethiopia.

(2) Anang Susanto, Merdeka University, Indonesia.

(3) S. V. Bakiya Lakshmi, National Institute of Food Technology, Entrepreneurship and Management, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sukumar Debnath, India.

(2) Vishal Vilasrao Naiknaware, Swa. Sawarkar Mahavidhyaya, Beed & Affillated by Dr B A M University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.1/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Debebe Landina Lata, Ethiopia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Anang Susanto, Indonesia) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (S. V. Bakiya Lakshmi, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Forms, Risk Factors, and Coping Strategies of Gender-Based Violence among Women in Agricultural Firms in Ondo State

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Roxana Plesa, University of Petrosani, Romania.

Reviewers:

(1) Syrenzo R. Sicuan, Pangasinan State University, Philippines.

(2) Sadife ÇINKIR, Türkiye.

(3) Rodica David, Romania.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fikadu Getachew Mideksa, Oromia Police College, Ethiopia.

(2) Ishani Vajpai, IIT Jodhpur, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Syrenzo R. Sicuan, Philippines) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Sadife ÇINKIR, Türkiye) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Rodica David, Romania) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: CLONING AND EXPRESSION OF ORF 2 PROTEIN OF PCV2 IN PICHIA PASTORIS

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Simone Aquino, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares (IPEN), Brazil.

(2) Prof. Hung-Jen Liu, National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan.

Reviewers:

(1) Utaji Isaac Ikwu, Federal College of Animal Health and Production Technology, Nigeria.

(2) Kosisochukwu Onyeagba, University of Cincinnati, USA.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Sonal Vishnu Gidwani, USA.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.9/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Utaji Isaac Ikwu, Nigeria) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kosisochukwu Onyeagba, USA) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Analysis of Components of Variances for Yield and Its Component Traits in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Hebron Branch, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Inka Dahlianah, Sjakhyakirti University, Indonesia.

(2) Abia Younas, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Inka Dahlianah, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Abia Younas, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA