Peer Review History: Raspberry Ketone: Advances in Chemistry, Pharmacology, Toxicology and Emerging Technologies (2015–2025)

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) B Lakshminarayanan, Sanjo College of Pharmaceutical Studies, India.

(2) Umbreen Navied, Lahore Medical and Dental College, Pakistan.

(3) Usman Wajid, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Pakistan.

(4) Muhammad Mohsin Rana, Niazi Medical and Dental College, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) R.Bhramaramba, Sir C R Reddy College Of Pharmaceutical Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.37/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (B Lakshminarayanan, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Umbreen Navied, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Usman Wajid, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Muhammad Mohsin Rana, Pakistan) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Hydrotherapy as a Complementary Approach in Hypertension Management: A Narrative Review

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Talha Bin Emran, BGC Trust University Bangladesh, Bangladesh.

Reviewers:

(1) Hendy Lesmana, Borneo Tarakan University, Indonesia.

(2) Pratap N. Mukhopadhyaya, India.

(3) Tooba Fateen, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Pakistan.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Paras Monga, OM Sterling Global University Hisar, India.

(2) Samuel Joseph Bebeley, Njala University – Bo Campus, Republic of Sierra Leone.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.93/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Hendy Lesmana, Indonesia) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Pratap N. Mukhopadhyaya, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Tooba Fateen, Pakistan) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Spatial Patterns and Regional Concentration of Cash Crops in Odisha, India

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Suvendu Roy, Khalisani mahavidyalaya, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Vaskar Barman, Prafulla Chandra College, India.

(2) Basirou Dembele, Universite Nazi BONI, Burkina Faso.

(3) K V Sambasivarao, NRI Institute of Technology, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.96/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Vaskar Barman, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Basirou Dembele, Burkina Faso) | File 1 |NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (K V Sambasivarao, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Integrated Sustainable Urban Fish Farming Technologies for Urban Eco-friendly Aquaculture: With Special Focus on Biofloc Technology

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Bhukya Bhaskar, India.

(2) Ritisnata Nayak, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, India.

(3) Hikmat Douhri, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Morocco.

(4) Manjulesh Pai, College of Fisheries, Mangalore, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Prashant Prabhakar Ingale , Saibaba Arts and Science College, India.

(2) Adil Usman, Harbin Institute of Technology, China.

(3) Ferudun KOÇER, USKİM, Turkey.

(4) Prasenjit Mali, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.2/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Bhukya Bhaskar, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Ritisnata Nayak, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Hikmat Douhri, Morocco) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_4 (Manjulesh Pai, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: A Review of Phenol Degrading Fungi from Industrial Areas

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Ana Cláudia Correia Coelho, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.

Reviewers:

(1) Saritha Pendlikatla, SGS Arts College, India.

(2) Kporvie Atsu Kodjo George, University of Lomé, Togo.

(3) Madhusudan S, Maharani’s Science College, Maharani Cluster University, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Saritha Pendlikatla, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Kporvie Atsu Kodjo George, Togo) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Madhusudan S, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Public Perceptions of Nutrition Gardening: An Integrated Approach to Climate Change, Malnutrition and Mental Health

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Jehad M. H. Ighbareyeh, Al-Quds Open University, Palestine.

Reviewers:

(1) Naila Irshad, University of Kashmir, India.

(2) Hassane Bassirou, University of Lome Togo, Togo.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Ali H. Wheeb, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

(2) Amr Mohamed Kotb Mahrous, El Saleheya El Gadida University, Egypt.

(3) K.Balaji, Christ University, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.57/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Naila Irshad, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Hassane Bassirou, Togo) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Crop Modelling: The Way towards Climate Smart Farming

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Rasmia Sayed Sayed Darwesh, Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt.

Reviewers:

(1) Md. Ariful Islam, Rajshahi University of Engineering & Technology, Bangladesh.

(2) Tahreem Bano Ashraf Ali Momin, K.M.E.Society’s G.M.Momin Women’s College, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Myrtel s. Bernardo, Bulacan Agricultural State College, Philippines.

(2) Sunil Kumar, Bihar Agricultural University, India.

(3) Uttam Kumer Sarker, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Bangladesh.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 7.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Md. Ariful Islam, Bangladesh) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Tahreem Bano Ashraf Ali Momin, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Minor Millets as Alternative Crops for Rice Fallow Lands: A Comprehensive Review

Editor(s):

(1) Prof. Isidro Alberto Pérez Bartolomé, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Reviewers:

(1) Rotte Sai Mithra, Professor Jayashanker Telangana State Agricultural University, India.

(2) Shankar Ram, India.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Kholu Mary, Central Agricultural University, India.

(2) Mohsen Javanmiri Pour, Iran.

(3) Unindajyoti Choudhury, Gauhati University, India.

(4) Yadav Uma Dharamraj, Mumbai university, India.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Rotte Sai Mithra, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Shankar Ram, India) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Revised_MS_v2_and_Feedback_v2 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: GC–MS Profiling and Pharmacological Implications of Bioactive Compounds in Holarrhena antidysenterica Bark Extract

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. Patrizia Diana, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.

(2) Prof. Marcello Iriti, Milan State University, Italy.

Reviewers:

(1) Alexander G. Dimitrov, Institute of Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria.

(2) Faisal Ghazi Lazim, University of Misan, Iraq.

(3) Balkrushna Dattatray, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, India.

Additional Reviewers:

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.5/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Alexander G. Dimitrov, Bulgaria) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Faisal Ghazi Lazim, Iraq) | File 1 | File 2


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Balkrushna Dattatray, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_2_v1 | File 1 | NA


Peer Review History: Recent Advances in the Development of New Antibiotics and Alternative Anti-infective Therapies

Editor(s):

(1) Dr. S.M.Chitra, Government Siddha Medical College, India.

Reviewers:

(1) Pranab Das, India.

(2) Farouk Hassan Farouk Hassan, Egypt.

(3) Benie Comoe Koffi Donatien, Côte d’Ivoire.

Additional Reviewers:

(1) Fauna Herawati, University of Surabaya, Indonesia.

(2) Hadeel Mahdi Hussein, Tikrit University, Iraq.

(3) Mukhtar.M.F. Abushaala, Libya.

Open Peer Review Policy: Click Here

Specific Comment:

Average Peer review marks at initial stage: 8.16/10

Average Peer review marks at publication stage: 9/10

Peer Review History:


Stage 1 | Original Manuscript | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_1 (Pranab Das, India) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_2 (Farouk Hassan Farouk Hassan, Egypt) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Peer Review Report_3 (Benie Comoe Koffi Donatien, Côte d’Ivoire) | File 1 | NA


Stage 2 | Revised_MS_v1_and_Feedback_v1 | File 1 | File 2


Stage 3 | Comment_Editor_1_v1 | File 1 | NA